IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gro/rugsom/00c01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic growth and labour productivity in Europe: half a century of East-West comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Ark, Bart van

    (Groningen University)

Abstract

This paper discusses the comparative productivity performance of Eastern and Western Europe since 1950. Firstly, it looks at the productivity estimates since the beginning of transition in 1989. Despite a decline in output, the turmoil of the late 1980s affected labour participation more strongly, so that labour productivity growth has been less affected than per capita income growth. Presently, there are signs of a renewed slowdown in productivity growth in Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC’s), even though there is much diversity between the countries. Secondly an historical approach is adopted by taking into account the growth performance of CEEC’s for the period 1950-1989. The estimates suggest a long-term trend towards productivity slowdown in Eastern Europe beyond the slowdown in Western Europe since 1973. Indeed the growth path in the CEEC’s before transition can be characterised as extensive growth. Growth was based on rapid accumulation of resources without successful application of new technologies, which led to declining efficiency in the use of resources. It is argued that the present difficulties in closing the productivity and income gap between East and West are still partly due to the legacy of the past. Policies to improve work organisation, change production strategies, and strengthen quality of training are typically effective in the long run and will not materialise in immediate sustained gains in productivity. Thirdly the paper takes a look at the convergence and divergence trends in productivity since 1950. It outlines a continuous process of productivity divergence between Eastern and Western Europe, despite convergence within each of the two regions. It is argued that the brief episode of convergence since 1992 is primarily the result of the recovery of shock effects of the transition. A long term process of productivity convergence depends on the success by which the past process of extensive growth can be transformed into intensive growth, i.e., growth based on efficient resource use and successful adaptation of new technologies. This requires institution building to strengthen the effectiveness of product, labour and capital markets in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Ark, Bart van, 2000. "Economic growth and labour productivity in Europe: half a century of East-West comparisons," Research Report 00C01, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
  • Handle: RePEc:gro:rugsom:00c01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/240328132
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maddison, Angus, 1998. "Measuring the Performance of a Communist Command Economy: An Assessment of the CIA Estimates for the U.S.S.R," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 44(3), pages 307-323, September.
    2. Robert J. Barro, 1998. "Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262522543, December.
    3. Chen, Yi Vivian & Heston, Alan & Lipsey, Robert, 2000. "International and interarea comparisons of income, output and prices," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 363-364, December.
    4. Beintema, N. & van Ark, B., 1993. "Comparative Productivity in East and Wst German Manufacturing before Reunification," Papers 550, Groningen State, Institute of Economic Research-.
    5. Ofer, Gur, 1987. "Soviet Economic Growth: 1928-1985," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1767-1833, December.
    6. Ludger Lindlar & Wolfgang Scheremet, 1998. "Germany's Slump Explaining the Unemployment Crisis of the 1990s," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 169, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Eva Ehrlich, 1991. "Contest between countries: 1937–1986," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 875-896.
    8. Bart van Ark & Erik Monnikhof & Marcel Timmer, 1999. "Prices, Quantities, and Productivity in Industry: A Study of Transition Economies in a Comparative Perspective," NBER Chapters, in: International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices, pages 327-367, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Bergson, Abram, 1987. "Comparative Productivity: The USSR, Eastern Europe, and the West," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(3), pages 342-357, June.
    10. Derek H. Aldcroft & Steven Morewood, 1995. "Economic Change in Eastern Europe since 1918," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 7.
    11. Angus Maddison, 1998. "Measuring The Performance Of A Communist Command Economy: An Assessment Of The Cia Estimates For The U.S.S.R," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 44(3), pages 307-323, September.
    12. Abramovitz,Moses, 1991. "Thinking about Growth," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521407748.
    13. Beintema, N. & van Ark, B., 1993. "Comparative Productivity in East and Wst German Manufacturing before Reunification," Papers 550, Groningen State, Institute of Economic Research-.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgescu, George, 2016. "The Gross Domestic Product. History, relevance and limitations in its interpretation," MPRA Paper 73644, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Georgescu, George, 2016. "Produsul intern brut. Istorie, relevanţă şi limitări în interpretare [The Gross Domestic Product. History, relevance and limitations in its interpretation]," MPRA Paper 72491, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dgr:rugggd:199941 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:dgr:rugsom:00c01 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ark, Bart van, 1999. "Economic growth and labour productivity in Europe : half a century of east-west comparisons," GGDC Research Memorandum 199941, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    4. Numa Mazat, 2016. "Structural Analysis Of The Economic Decline And Collapse Of The Soviet Union," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 029, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    5. Tamás Vonyó & Alexander Klein, 2019. "Why did socialist economies fail? The role of factor inputs reconsidered," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 72(1), pages 317-345, February.
    6. Sudip Ranjan Basu, 2017. "Do data show divergence? Revisiting global income inequality trends," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 24(1), pages 23-53, June.
    7. Filip Novokmet & Thomas Piketty & Gabriel Zucman, 2018. "From Soviets to oligarchs: inequality and property in Russia 1905-2016," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(2), pages 189-223, June.
    8. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-88 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lein-Lein Chen & John Devereux, 2017. "The Iron Rice Bowl: Chinese Living Standards 1952–1978," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 59(3), pages 261-310, September.
    10. Broadberry, Stephen & Klein, Alexander, 2011. "When and why did eastern European economies begin to fail? Lessons from a Czechoslovak/UK productivity comparison, 1921-1991," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 37-52, January.
    11. Inklaar, Robert & Wu, Harry & Ark, Bart van, 2003. ""Losing ground" : Japanese labour productivity and unit laboour cost manufacturing in comparison to the U.S," GGDC Research Memorandum 200364, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    12. repec:dgr:rugggd:200251 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. William Jefferies, 2021. "China’s Accession to the WTO and the Collapse That Never Was," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 300-319, June.
    14. Alan Heston & Robert E. Lipsey, 1999. "Introduction to "International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices"," NBER Chapters, in: International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices, pages 1-9, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. repec:dgr:rugggd:200362 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Thomas Keywood & Jörg Baten, 2021. "Elite violence and elite numeracy in Europe from 500 to 1900 CE: roots of the divergence," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 15(2), pages 319-389, May.
    17. Bart van Ark & Erik Monnikhof & Marcel Timmer, 1999. "Prices, Quantities, and Productivity in Industry: A Study of Transition Economies in a Comparative Perspective," NBER Chapters, in: International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices, pages 327-367, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. repec:dgr:rugggd:200364 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:dgr:rugggd:199406 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Castaldi, Carolina & Sapio, Sandro, 2006. "The Properties of Sectoral Growth: Evidence from Four Large European Economies," GGDC Research Memorandum GD-88, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    21. repec:dgr:rugsom:03c20 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Ilya B. Voskoboynikov, 2021. "Accounting for growth in the USSR and Russia, 1950–2012," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 870-894, July.
    23. William Jefferies, 2015. "On the Alleged Stagnation of Capitalism," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 588-607, December.
    24. Bayarsaihan, T. & Coelli, T. J., 2003. "Productivity growth in pre-1990 Mongolian agriculture: spiralling disaster or emerging success?," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-137, March.
    25. Robert J. Hill, 2004. "Constructing Price Indexes across Space and Time: The Case of the European Union," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1379-1410, December.
    26. Lavopa, Alejandro & Szirmai, Adam, 2015. "Industrialisation in Time and Space," MERIT Working Papers 2015-039, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    27. Angus Maddison & Bart van Ark, 2002. "The International Comparison of Real Product and Productivity," Chapters, in: Angus Maddison & D. S. Prasada & William Shepherd (ed.), The Asian Economies in the Twentieth Century, chapter 2, pages 5-26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    28. Michaël Freudenberg & Deniz Ünal-Kesenci, 1994. "French and German Productivity Levels in Manufacturing: A Comparison Based on the Industry-of-Origin Method," Working Papers 1994-10, CEPII research center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gro:rugsom:00c01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hanneke Tamling (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.