IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/got/gotcrc/237.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Index of Inter-Industry Wage Inequality: Trends, Comparisons, and Robustness

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Scholl

Abstract

This paper introduces a newly constructed Theil index of between-sectoral manufacturing wage inequality and empirically tests whether the measure can serve as a basis for more general statements about the evolution of broader concepts of inequality, as argued by the authors of the University of Texas Inequality Project (UTIP) for their very similar index. Building on prior work of the UTIP, several concerns regarding the treatment of the raw data as well as important questions of internal and external validity are addressed. The index is based on sector-level data from the UNIDO Industrial Statistics for manufacturing, and I provide a detailed account of how the unbalanced raw data were treated. The newly computed index has the advantage of being consistently measured across countries and years, which makes it a valuable resource for empirical studies focusing on changes in the manufacturing structure within countries over long periods of time. However, its narrow scope also restricts the applicability of the index for other, broader uses. I argue that the latter point is one of the main drawbacks of the index and present evidence that the generalizability from between-sectoral manufacturing wage inequality to overall income inequality is severely limited. This applies not only to the extent to which the index allows conjectures about the overall level of income inequality in a society. There is reason to also question the “internal” capability of the index to accurately reflect developments in manufacturing wage inequality. I therefore do not recommend using the index as a basis for inference about the development of broader concepts of wageor income equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Scholl, 2017. "An Index of Inter-Industry Wage Inequality: Trends, Comparisons, and Robustness," Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers 237, Courant Research Centre PEG.
  • Handle: RePEc:got:gotcrc:237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.vwl.wiso.uni-goettingen.de/courant-papers/CRC-PEG_DP_237.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Inequality measurement; Wage inequality; Income inequality; Manufacturing wage inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:got:gotcrc:237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dominik Noe (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/82144.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.