Attrition in the Kwazulu Natal income dynamics study, 1993-1998
AbstractThis paper examines attrition in the KwaZulu-Natal Income Dynamics Study (1993–1998) and assesses the extent of attrition bias for a specific empirical example. The analysis shows that 1993 first round nonresponse is largely unrelated to observable characteristics of the communities other than indicators of migration activity. Multivariate regressions are then used to describe the characteristics of the households attriting in 1998, revealing the importance of distinguishing between two types of attriting households, those that moved and those that apparently moved but left no trace. For example, increased household size reduced the probability of either type of attrition, whereas measures of higher quality of fieldwork in the 1993 survey only reduced the probability that a household left no trace. While observable differences between attritors and non-attritors indicate attrition is nonrandom, it does not necessarily follow that estimated relationships based on the non-attriting sample suffer from attrition bias. To more directly explore attrition bias, which is by its nature model specific, this analysis estimates household-level expenditure functions correcting for attrition bias using standard Heckman selection procedures and a quality of 1993 interview variablesas identifying instruments. There is positive selection, and although many of the other parameter estimates are quite similar, a Hausman test rejects the equality of coefficients between the corrected and uncorrected models. Therefore, this study concludes, at least for this simple case, that attrition does appear to bias the “behavioral” coefficients.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in its series FCND briefs with number 95.
Date of creation: 2000
Date of revision:
Consumers Mathematical models. ; Household consumption Mathematical models. ; Surveys. ; Analysis of variance. ;
Other versions of this item:
- Maluccio, John A., 2000. "Attrition in the Kwazulu Natal income dynamics study, 1993-1998," FCND discussion papers 95, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Julia Vaillant, 2013.
"Attrition and Follow-Up Rules in Panel Surveys: Insights from a Tracking Experience in Madagascar,"
Review of Income and Wealth,
International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 59(3), pages 509-538, 09.
- Vaillant, Julia, 2013. "Attrition and Follow-Up Rules in Panel Surveys: Insights from a Tracking Experience in Madagascar," Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine 123456789/5443, Paris Dauphine University.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.