IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fbk/wpaper/2017-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Microdata for social sciences and policy evaluation as a public good

Author

Listed:
  • Ugo Trivellato

Abstract

The balance between the right to privacy and the right to freedom of information is altered when scientific research comes into play, because of its inherent needs and societal function. This paper argues that, for research purposes, microdata should be characterised as a public good. The evolution of the rules and practices in the European Union (EU) for protecting confidentiality while allowing access to microdata for research purposes is reviewed. Two key directions are identified for further improvement: remote access to confidential data and the enlargement of the notion of ‘European statistics’ to include microdata produced for evaluating interventions (co)financed by the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Ugo Trivellato, 2017. "Microdata for social sciences and policy evaluation as a public good," FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers 2017-06, Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (IRVAPP), Bruno Kessler Foundation.
    • Handle: RePEc:fbk:wpaper:2017-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://irvapp.fbk.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/WP_IRVAPP_2017-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James J. Heckman & Jeffrey A. Smith, 1995. "Assessing the Case for Social Experiments," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 85-110, Spring.
    2. Anonymous, 1950. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 512-518, August.
    3. Anonymous, 1950. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 333-335, May.
    4. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens, 2017. "The State of Applied Econometrics: Causality and Policy Evaluation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 3-32, Spring.
    5. Anonymous, 1950. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 689-694, November.
    6. Anonymous, 1950. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 149-153, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emery, Tom, 2019. "The Sustainability of Social Science Survey Infrastructures," SocArXiv gts2w, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trivellato, Ugo, 2017. "Microdata for Social Sciences and Policy Evaluation as a Public Good," IZA Discussion Papers 11092, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Fanny Janssen & Anthe van den Hende & Joop de Beer & Leo van Wissen, 2016. "Sigma and beta convergence in regional mortality: A case study of the Netherlands," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(4), pages 81-116.
    3. Roland Rau & Gabriele Doblhammer & Vladimir Canudas-Romo & Zhang Zhen, 2008. "Cause-of-Death Contributions to Educational Inequalities in Mortality in Austria between 1981/1982 and 1991/1992," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 24(3), pages 265-286, September.
    4. Dan Valeriu Voinea, 2015. "The journalists' obligation of protecting the victims of sexual assault," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 2(1), pages 101-109, August.
    5. Coruhlu, Yakup Emre & Yildiz, Okan, 2017. "Geographical database for object-oriented land division modelling in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 212-221.
    6. Danan Gu & Patrick Gerland & Kirill F. Andreev & Nan Li & Thomas Spoorenberg & Gerhard Heilig, 2013. "Old age mortality in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(38), pages 999-1038.
    7. Titus Corlatean, 2020. "Risks, Discrimination and Opportunities for Education during the Times of COVID-19 Pandemic," Proceedings of the 17th International RAIS Conference, June 1-2, 2020 004tc, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    8. Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna, 2017. "Building Universal Socio-cultural Indicators for Standardizing the Safeguarding of Citizens’ Rights in Smart Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 563-579, January.
    9. Shiro Horiuchi & Nadine Ouellette & Siu Lan Karen Cheung & Jean-Marie Robine, 2013. "Modal age at death: lifespan indicator in the era of longevity extension," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 11(1), pages 37-69.
    10. Crina Mihaela Verga, 2020. "Pilot Judgments Delivered by the European Court of Human Rights against Romania," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Stiinte Politice si Studii Europene/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Political Sciences and European Studies, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 38-46, December.
    11. Ó Fathaigh, Ronan & Helberger, Natali & Appelman, Naomi, 2021. "The perils of legally defining disinformation," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25.
    12. Titus Corlatean, 2021. "The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Monitoring on the Implementation of the European Court of Human Rights Judgments," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2021 0020, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    13. Sanchez Marrugo, Betshy Paola, 2021. "Women Who Are Mad," MPRA Paper 111042, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Bleeker, Amelia, 2020. "Creating an enabling environment for e-government and the protection of privacy rights in the Caribbean: A review of data protection legislation for alignment with the General Data Protection Regulati," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 46277, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    15. Bryony Hoskins & Massimiliano Mascherini, 2009. "Measuring Active Citizenship through the Development of a Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 459-488, February.
    16. Joseph Rikhof & Ashley Geerts, 2019. "Protected Groups in Refugee Law and International Law," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-47, October.
    17. France Meslé & Jacques Vallin, 2017. "The End of East–West Divergence in European Life Expectancies? An Introduction to the Special Issue," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 615-627, December.
    18. Balogh, Cintia, 2015. "International refugee law and the European Union's Refugee Protection Protocol: A study on the ius cogens norm of non-refoulement," IPE Working Papers 49/2015, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    19. Agnieszka Fihel & Marketa Pechholdová, 2017. "Between ‘Pioneers’ of the Cardiovascular Revolution and Its ‘Late Followers’: Mortality Changes in the Czech Republic and Poland Since 1968," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 651-678, December.
    20. Liliana Lizarazo-Rodriguez, 2021. "The UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and the Greening of Human Rights Litigation: Fishing in Fragmented Waters?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Counterfactual impact evaluation; Privacy & data protection; Microdata access; Intelligent openness; Public policies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • J08 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics Policies
    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fbk:wpaper:2017-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alessio Tomelleri or Daniela Anesi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irvapit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.