IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v130y2017i2d10.1007_s11205-015-1192-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Universal Socio-cultural Indicators for Standardizing the Safeguarding of Citizens’ Rights in Smart Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna

    (University of Girona)

Abstract

This research explores the opportunity to use standards as recommender instruments for designing urban policy. Standards are soft regulatory mechanisms that can be used for monitoring and safeguarding. More precisely, we explore the potential use of social standards for centering the focus of the smart cities initiative back to the citizens, and establishing a citizen-centered approach. This is in contrast to the industrial drive and technological emphasis which currently dominates. Accordingly, we present a set of novel citizenship indicators which serve as the basis for the social standardization of smart cities, something which is not now taking place, in order to ensure and safeguard the basic social urban rights of citizens. The juridical basis and well-established points of reference for building indicators for citizens’ rights in the city are two International Charters. These are the European Charter for the Safeguarding of Human Rights in the City, and the Global Charter-Agenda for Human Rights in the City. In this paper, we start by comparing and analyzing the rights contained in each of the two Charters, and elaborating indicators for measuring the promotion and protection of these rights. The elaboration of indicators has been based on different criteria and under the common premise of universal existence of feeding data, which is the most recurrent problem when building indicators meant to be global. Next, at the request of the International Standards Organization (ISO), we select the most relevant socio-cultural indicators for the Global Charter Agenda, which will be introduced in the on-going revision of the smart cities and communities standard ISO 37120:2014 Sustainable development of communities—Indicators for city services and quality of life. This will make ISO 37120 a more beneficial social standard for monitoring and safeguarding citizens’ rights in the smart city.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna, 2017. "Building Universal Socio-cultural Indicators for Standardizing the Safeguarding of Citizens’ Rights in Smart Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 563-579, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:130:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-015-1192-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-015-1192-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-015-1192-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-015-1192-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Jonathan Lepofsky & James C. Fraser, 2003. "Building Community Citizens: Claiming the Right to Place-making in the City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 127-142, January.
    3. Alison Brown, 2013. "The Right to the City: Road to R io 2010," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 957-971, May.
    4. David Harvey, 2003. "The right to the city," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 939-941, December.
    5. Anonymous, 1950. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 689-694, November.
    6. Anonymous, 1950. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 149-153, February.
    7. Annette M. Kim, 2011. "Introduction: Real Rights to the City—Cases of Property Rights Changes towards Equity in Eastern Asia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 459-469, February.
    8. David Drakakis-Smith, 1995. "Third World Cities: Sustainable Urban Development, 1," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(4-5), pages 659-677, May.
    9. Anonymous, 1950. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 512-518, August.
    10. Nishtha Mehta, 2012. "Negotiating Marginalities: Right to the City's Water," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(2), pages 79-85, March.
    11. Susan Parnell & Edgar Pieterse, 2010. "The ‘Right to the City’: Institutional Imperatives of a Developmental State," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 146-162, March.
    12. Anonymous, 1950. "Council of Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 333-335, May.
    13. Dikmen Bezmez, 2013. "Urban Citizenship, the Right to the City and Politics of Disability in I stanbul," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 93-114, January.
    14. Sabine Horlitz & Anne Vogelpohl, 2009. "Something Can Be Done! — A Report on the Conference ‘Right to the City. Prospects for Critical Urban Theory and Practice’, Berlin November 2008," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1067-1072, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. H. Patricia McKenna, 2019. "Innovating Metrics for Smarter, Responsive Cities," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Yelda Yucel, 2022. "Capabilities Indicators for Human Rights Cities in Turkey: A Gender-Specific Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 495-522, January.
    3. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E. & Hawken, Scott & Sargolzaei, Sharifeh & Foroozanfa, Mona, 2019. "Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 105-116.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liliana Lizarazo-Rodriguez, 2021. "The UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and the Greening of Human Rights Litigation: Fishing in Fragmented Waters?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Fanny Janssen & Anthe van den Hende & Joop de Beer & Leo van Wissen, 2016. "Sigma and beta convergence in regional mortality: A case study of the Netherlands," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(4), pages 81-116.
    3. Roland Rau & Gabriele Doblhammer & Vladimir Canudas-Romo & Zhang Zhen, 2008. "Cause-of-Death Contributions to Educational Inequalities in Mortality in Austria between 1981/1982 and 1991/1992," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 24(3), pages 265-286, September.
    4. Dan Valeriu Voinea, 2015. "The journalists' obligation of protecting the victims of sexual assault," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 2(1), pages 101-109, August.
    5. Coruhlu, Yakup Emre & Yildiz, Okan, 2017. "Geographical database for object-oriented land division modelling in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 212-221.
    6. Danan Gu & Patrick Gerland & Kirill F. Andreev & Nan Li & Thomas Spoorenberg & Gerhard Heilig, 2013. "Old age mortality in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(38), pages 999-1038.
    7. Titus Corlatean, 2020. "Risks, Discrimination and Opportunities for Education during the Times of COVID-19 Pandemic," Proceedings of the 17th International RAIS Conference, June 1-2, 2020 004tc, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    8. Shiro Horiuchi & Nadine Ouellette & Siu Lan Karen Cheung & Jean-Marie Robine, 2013. "Modal age at death: lifespan indicator in the era of longevity extension," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 11(1), pages 37-69.
    9. Crina Mihaela Verga, 2020. "Pilot Judgments Delivered by the European Court of Human Rights against Romania," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Stiinte Politice si Studii Europene/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Political Sciences and European Studies, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 6(2), pages 38-46, December.
    10. Ó Fathaigh, Ronan & Helberger, Natali & Appelman, Naomi, 2021. "The perils of legally defining disinformation," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25.
    11. Titus Corlatean, 2021. "The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Monitoring on the Implementation of the European Court of Human Rights Judgments," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2021 0020, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    12. Sanchez Marrugo, Betshy Paola, 2021. "Women Who Are Mad," MPRA Paper 111042, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Bleeker, Amelia, 2020. "Creating an enabling environment for e-government and the protection of privacy rights in the Caribbean: A review of data protection legislation for alignment with the General Data Protection Regulati," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 46277, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    14. Bryony Hoskins & Massimiliano Mascherini, 2009. "Measuring Active Citizenship through the Development of a Composite Indicator," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 459-488, February.
    15. Joseph Rikhof & Ashley Geerts, 2019. "Protected Groups in Refugee Law and International Law," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-47, October.
    16. France Meslé & Jacques Vallin, 2017. "The End of East–West Divergence in European Life Expectancies? An Introduction to the Special Issue," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 615-627, December.
    17. Balogh, Cintia, 2015. "International refugee law and the European Union's Refugee Protection Protocol: A study on the ius cogens norm of non-refoulement," IPE Working Papers 49/2015, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    18. Agnieszka Fihel & Marketa Pechholdová, 2017. "Between ‘Pioneers’ of the Cardiovascular Revolution and Its ‘Late Followers’: Mortality Changes in the Czech Republic and Poland Since 1968," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 651-678, December.
    19. Nathan Clark & Kristoffer Albris, 2020. "In the Interest(s) of Many: Governing Data in Crises," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 421-431.
    20. Michel Guillot & Natalia Gavrilova & Tetyana Pudrovska, 2011. "Understanding the “Russian Mortality Paradox” in Central Asia: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 48(3), pages 1081-1104, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:130:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-015-1192-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.