IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fao/wpaper/0409.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Attitudes Towards Agricultural Biotechnology

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas J. Hoban

Abstract

The full benefits of agricultural biotechnology will only be realized if consumers and food manufacturers consider it safe and beneficial. Although few internationally comparable public opinion surveys have been conducted on this issue, the available evidence suggests that public attitudes differ sharply both between and within countries and are evolving over time. Consumer attitudes have been studied in the United States and Europe for more than a decade. This research is reviewed along with the available data from Latin America, Asia and Africa. Results from the largest internationally comparable public opinion survey on agricultural biotechnology to date are highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas J. Hoban, 2004. "Public Attitudes Towards Agricultural Biotechnology," Working Papers 04-09, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
  • Handle: RePEc:fao:wpaper:0409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/ae064e/ae064e00.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoban, Thomas J., 1996. "Trends In Consumer Acceptance And Awareness Of Biotechnology," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jabłońska, Lilianna & Żuchowski, Stanisław & Olewnicki, Dawid, 2016. "GMOs IN THE POLISH FRUIT AND VEGETABLES CONSUMER AWARENESS," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 40(2).
    2. Aerni, Philipp & Bernauer, Thomas, 2006. "Stakeholder attitudes toward GMOs in the Philippines, Mexico, and South Africa: The issue of public trust," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 557-575, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R.B. Kim, 2009. "Factors influencing Chinese consumer behavior when buying innovative food products," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(9), pages 436-445.
    2. Hoban, Thomas J., 2004. "Public Attitudes towards Agricultural Biotechnology," ESA Working Papers 23810, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    3. Renee B. KIM, 2010. "A multi-attribute model of Japanese consumer's purchase intention for GM foods," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(10), pages 449-459.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural products; Biochemical engineering; Biosafety; Biotechnology; Certification; Consumers; Food industry; Food safety; Genetic engineering; Genetically modified organisms; Plant biotechnology; Product labelling; Public opinion; Technology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fao:wpaper:0409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gustavo Anríquez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faoooit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.