IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id11633.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is Domestic Violence a Lesser Crime? Countering the Backlash against Section 498A, IPC

Author

Listed:
  • Shalu Nigam

Abstract

The situation today is that domestic violence is treated as a `social crime’ when compared with violence by strangers, even though it is much more severe in nature. Why is wife beating considered as a lesser crime by the state, society and the law? Why is the perpetrator of this crime not held accountable for his actions? Why are different parameters and standards of justice utilized when a woman is abused? Why has the criminal justice system failed to deliver justice to the victims of domestic violence? How effective is the strategy adopted by the women’s movement in India whereby a heavy emphasis is placed on legal reforms to achieve the goal of gender justice? Why has the state failed to see women as autonomous citizens outside the construct of family or kinship? Why could the remedies beyond the law, such as provision of shelter homes or material and economic support for women not be implemented? This study examines these questions while using secondary data and refers to the multidisciplinary research studies and reports on the issue from the perspectives of the survivors to focus on a `bubble up’ approach rather than the `top down’ style of understanding the issue of domestic violence. [CWDS Occasional Paper No.61].

Suggested Citation

  • Shalu Nigam, 2017. "Is Domestic Violence a Lesser Crime? Countering the Backlash against Section 498A, IPC," Working Papers id:11633, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11633
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A2017221125517_20.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=11633&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed, S. & Koenig, M.A. & Stephenson, R., 2006. "Effects of domestic violence on perinatal and early childhood mortality: Evidence from North India," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(8), pages 1423-1428.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sofia Amaral, 2015. "Do Improved Property Rights Decrease Violence Against Women in India?," Discussion Papers 15-10, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    2. World Bank, 2011. "Poverty and Social Exclusion in India," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2289, December.
    3. Pal, Sumantra, 2018. "Spousal Violence and Social Norms in India's North East," EconStor Preprints 179422, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Das, Tanu & Roy, Tamal Basu & Roy, Ranjan, 2021. "Reintegration with family and intimate partner violence (IPV) against women among the returnee migrant worker’s family during COVID-19 induced lockdown: A Block-level analysis using multinomial logist," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Pramesh Raj Ghimire & Kingsley E. Agho & Blessing J. Akombi & Nidhi Wali & Michael Dibley & Camille Raynes-Greenow & Andre M. N. Renzaho, 2018. "Perinatal Mortality in South Asia: Systematic Review of Observational Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Homan, Patricia, 2017. "Political gender inequality and infant mortality in the United States, 1990–2012," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 127-135.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.