Assessing Welfare Effects of the European Choice Agenda: The case of health care in the United Kingdom
AbstractChoice and competition policies in public services are popular reform strategies in the member states of the European Union (EU). The European choice agenda is based on the view in the EU of ‘social policy as a productive factor’ and the need for ‘modernisation’ of the EU welfare states. This user-led, consumer oriented approach highlights the need to understand the effects of the choice and competition policies in public service. In conventional welfare economic the focus lies on analysis of efficiency, quality and equity effects and the current empirical evidence show varying results. This paper discusses choice policies in European countries and uses the case of choice in health care in the UK is to assess the welfare effects of choice and competition. The UK has a highly developed consumerist policy, and as it has served as a role model for other European countries implementing choice policies. The welfare effects are assessed using satisfaction with the NHS and subjective well-being as an indicator of individual welfare, gained from the introduction of choice of hospital in 2006. Further the equity aspect of choice is assessed by analysing variation in welfare effects between socio economic groups. The results indicate positive effects of choice, particularly for middle class individuals.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by London School of Economics / European Institute in its series Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) with number 5.
Date of creation: 12 May 2011
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/europeanInstitute
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2011-05-24 (All new papers)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Joan Costa Font & Juan Rovira Forns, 2004.
"Eliciting Preferences for Collectively Financed Health Programmes: the Willingness to Assign Approach,"
Working Papers in Economics
117, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
- Joan Costa-Font & Joan Rovira, 2005. "Eliciting preferences for collectively financed health programmes: the 'willingness to assign' approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(14), pages 1571-1583.
- Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell & Paul Frijters, 2002.
"How important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness?,"
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers
02-024/3, Tinbergen Institute.
- Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell & Paul Frijters, 2004. "How Important is Methodology for the estimates of the determinants of Happiness?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(497), pages 641-659, 07.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Katjana Gattermann).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.