IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureri/78820.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparison of Optimization Methods for Solving the Depot Matching and Parking Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Haahr, J.T.
  • Lusby, R.M.
  • Wagenaar, J.C.

Abstract

We consider the Train Unit Shunting Problem, an important plan- ning problem for passenger railway operators. This problem entails assigning physical train units to scheduled train services in such a way that the resulting shunting yard operations are feasible. As such, it arises at every shunting yard in the railway network and involves matching train units to arriving and departing train services as well as assigning the selected matchings to appropriate shunting yard tracks. We present a comparison benchmark of multiple solution approaches for this problem. In particular, we have developed a Constraint Pro- gramming formulation, a Column Generation approach, and a random- ized greedy heuristic. We compare and benchmark these approaches against slightly adjusted existing methods based on a a Mixed Inte- ger Linear Program, and a Two-Stage heuristic. The benchmark con- tains multiple real-life instances provided by the Danish State Rail- ways (DSB) and Netherlands Railways (NS). The results highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the considered approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Haahr, J.T. & Lusby, R.M. & Wagenaar, J.C., 2015. "A Comparison of Optimization Methods for Solving the Depot Matching and Parking Problem," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2015-013-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:78820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/78820/ERS-2015-013-LIS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Freling & Ramon M. Lentink & Leo G. Kroon & Dennis Huisman, 2005. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units in a Railway Station," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 261-272, May.
    2. Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Alexander Schrijver, 2008. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units: An Integrated Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 436-449, November.
    3. Freling, R. & Lentink, R.M. & Kroon, L.G. & Huisman, D., 2002. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units in a Railway Station," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-74-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Pisinger, David, 1995. "An expanding-core algorithm for the exact 0-1 knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 175-187, November.
    5. Pisinger, David, 1995. "A minimal algorithm for the multiple-choice knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 394-410, June.
    6. Fioole, Pieter-Jan & Kroon, Leo & Maroti, Gabor & Schrijver, Alexander, 2006. "A rolling stock circulation model for combining and splitting of passenger trains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1281-1297, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Artigues & Eric Bourreau & Vincent Jost & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & François Ramond, 2018. "Trains do not vanish: the ROADEF/EURO challenge 2014," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1091-1105, December.
    2. Budai-Balke, G. & Maróti, G. & Dekker, R. & Huisman, D. & Kroon, L.G., 2007. "Re-scheduling in railways: the rolling stock balancing problem," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-21, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    3. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Florian Jaehn & Erwin Pesch, 2013. "A Survey on Container Processing in Railway Yards," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 312-329, August.
    4. Haahr, Jørgen & Lusby, Richard M., 2017. "Integrating rolling stock scheduling with train unit shunting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 452-468.
    5. Haahr, Jørgen Thorlund & Lusby, Richard M. & Wagenaar, Joris Camiel, 2017. "Optimization methods for the Train Unit Shunting Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 981-995.
    6. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Jaehn, Florian & Pesch, Erwin, 2012. "Shunting yard operations: Theoretical aspects and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 1-14.
    7. Lin, Zhiyuan & Kwan, Raymond S.K., 2016. "A branch-and-price approach for solving the train unit scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-120.
    8. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon, 2016. "The parallel stack loading problem to minimize blockages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 618-627.
    9. Subhash C. Sarin & Hanif D. Sherali & Seon Ki Kim, 2014. "A branch‐and‐price approach for the stochastic generalized assignment problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 131-143, March.
    10. Jiaxi Wang & Manfred Gronalt & Yan Sun, 2017. "A two-stage approach to the depot shunting driver assignment problem with workload balance considerations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Li, Xin & Qian, Zhuzhong & You, Ilsun & Lu, Sanglu, 2014. "Towards cost efficient mobile service and information management in ubiquitous environment with cloud resource scheduling," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 319-328.
    12. David Pisinger, 2000. "A Minimal Algorithm for the Bounded Knapsack Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 75-82, February.
    13. Wishon, Christopher & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2016. "Robust efficiency measures for linear knapsack problem variants," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 398-409.
    14. Zhiyuan Lin & Eva Barrena & Raymond S. K. Kwan, 2017. "Train unit scheduling guided by historic capacity provisions and passenger count surveys," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 137-154, July.
    15. Higgins Michael J. & Rivest Ronald L. & Stark Philip B., 2011. "Sharper p-Values for Stratified Election Audits," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-37, October.
    16. Nielsen, Lars Kjær & Kroon, Leo & Maróti, Gábor, 2012. "A rolling horizon approach for disruption management of railway rolling stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 496-509.
    17. Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Alexander Schrijver, 2008. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units: An Integrated Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 436-449, November.
    18. Yanasse, Horacio Hideki & Pinto Lamosa, Maria Jose, 2007. "An integrated cutting stock and sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(3), pages 1353-1370, December.
    19. Martin Josef Geiger & Sandra Huber & Sebastian Langton & Marius Leschik & Christian Lindorf & Ulrich Tüshaus, 2018. "Multi-attribute assignment of trains to departures in rolling stock management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 1131-1163, December.
    20. Kroon, L.G. & Lentink, R.M. & Schrijver, A., 2006. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units: an Integrated Approach," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-068-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    passenger railway optimization; shunting; matching; parking;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:78820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erimanl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.