IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pubtra/v9y2017i1d10.1007_s12469-016-0138-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Train unit scheduling guided by historic capacity provisions and passenger count surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiyuan Lin

    (University of Leeds)

  • Eva Barrena

    (University of Leeds)

  • Raymond S. K. Kwan

    (University of Leeds)

Abstract

Train unit scheduling concerns the assignment of train unit vehicles to cover all the journeys in a fixed timetable. Coupling and decoupling activities are allowed in order to achieve optimal utilization while satisfying passenger demands. While the scheduling methods usually assume unique and well-defined train capacity requirements, in practice most UK train operators consider different levels of capacity provisions. Those capacity provisions are normally influenced by information such as passenger count surveys, historic provisions and absolute minimums required by the authorities. In this paper, we study the problem of train unit scheduling with bi-level capacity requirements and propose a new integer multicommodity flow model based on previous research. Computational experiments on real-world data show the effectiveness of our proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiyuan Lin & Eva Barrena & Raymond S. K. Kwan, 2017. "Train unit scheduling guided by historic capacity provisions and passenger count surveys," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 137-154, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:9:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s12469-016-0138-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12469-016-0138-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12469-016-0138-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12469-016-0138-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leo G. Kroon & Ramon M. Lentink & Alexander Schrijver, 2008. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units: An Integrated Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 436-449, November.
    2. Arianna Alfieri & Rutger Groot & Leo Kroon & Alexander Schrijver, 2006. "Efficient Circulation of Railway Rolling Stock," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 378-391, August.
    3. Fioole, Pieter-Jan & Kroon, Leo & Maroti, Gabor & Schrijver, Alexander, 2006. "A rolling stock circulation model for combining and splitting of passenger trains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 1281-1297, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Lei & Raymond S K Kwan & Zhiyuan Lin & Pedro J Copado-Mendez, 2022. "Resolution of coupling order and station level constraints in train unit scheduling," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 27-61, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Zhiyuan & Kwan, Raymond S.K., 2016. "A branch-and-price approach for solving the train unit scheduling problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-120.
    2. Nielsen, Lars Kjær & Kroon, Leo & Maróti, Gábor, 2012. "A rolling horizon approach for disruption management of railway rolling stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 496-509.
    3. Hoogervorst, R. & Dollevoet, T.A.B. & Maróti, G. & Huisman, D., 2018. "Reducing Passenger Delays by Rolling Stock Rescheduling," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-29, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Canca, David & Barrena, Eva, 2018. "The integrated rolling stock circulation and depot location problem in railway rapid transit systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 115-138.
    5. Lin, Boliang & Zhao, Yinan, 2021. "Synchronized optimization of EMU train assignment and second-level preventive maintenance scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Haahr, J.T. & Wagenaar, J.C. & Veelenturf, L.P. & Kroon, L.G., 2015. "A Comparison of Two Exact Methods for Passenger Railway Rolling Stock (Re)Scheduling," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2015-007-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Xueqiao Yu & Maoxiang Lang & Wenhui Zhang & Shiqi Li & Mingyue Zhang & Xiao Yu, 2019. "An Empirical Study on the Comprehensive Optimization Method of a Train Diagram of the China High Speed Railway Express," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Wang, Yihui & Tang, Tao & Ning, Bin & Meng, Lingyun, 2017. "Integrated optimization of regular train schedule and train circulation plan for urban rail transit lines," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 83-104.
    9. Yu Zhou & Leishan Zhou & Yun Wang & Zhuo Yang & Jiawei Wu, 2017. "Application of Multiple-Population Genetic Algorithm in Optimizing the Train-Set Circulation Plan Problem," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-14, July.
    10. Zhong, Qingwei & Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Zhang, Yongxiang & Peng, Qiyuan, 2019. "Rolling stock scheduling with maintenance requirements at the Chinese High-Speed Railway," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 24-44.
    11. Zhiyuan Lin & Raymond S. K. Kwan, 2016. "Local convex hulls for a special class of integer multicommodity flow problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 881-919, July.
    12. Lusby, Richard M. & Haahr, Jørgen Thorlund & Larsen, Jesper & Pisinger, David, 2017. "A Branch-and-Price algorithm for railway rolling stock rescheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 228-250.
    13. Wenliang Zhou & Mehdi Oldache, 2021. "Integrated Optimization of Line Planning, Timetabling and Rolling Stock Allocation for Urban Railway Lines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    14. Valentina Cacchiani & Alberto Caprara & Paolo Toth, 2019. "An Effective Peak Period Heuristic for Railway Rolling Stock Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 746-762, May.
    15. Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & De Almeida, David & Guyon, Olivier & Benhizia, Faten, 2015. "A Lagrangian heuristic framework for a real-life integrated planning problem of railway transportation resources," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 138-150.
    16. Zhou, Housheng & Qi, Jianguo & Yang, Lixing & Shi, Jungang & Pan, Hanchuan & Gao, Yuan, 2022. "Joint optimization of train timetabling and rolling stock circulation planning: A novel flexible train composition mode," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 352-385.
    17. Haahr, Jørgen & Lusby, Richard M., 2017. "Integrating rolling stock scheduling with train unit shunting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 452-468.
    18. Wang, Yihui & Zhao, Kangqi & D’Ariano, Andrea & Niu, Ru & Li, Shukai & Luan, Xiaojie, 2021. "Real-time integrated train rescheduling and rolling stock circulation planning for a metro line under disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 87-117.
    19. Gao, Yuan & Schmidt, Marie & Yang, Lixing & Gao, Ziyou, 2020. "A branch-and-price approach for trip sequence planning of high-speed train units," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:9:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s12469-016-0138-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.