Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Better qualified but a lower acceptance rate: does Higher Education discriminate against women?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Leslie, Derek

    (Manchester Metropolitan University)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Using a sample of around 2.3 million observations on applications to UK Higher Education institutions from 1996-2001, the paper explores whether the selection process into Higher Education is discriminatory. The answer is no discrimination, even though women are better qualified and less likely to be offered an HE place. The lower tier Higher National Diploma sector is a key issue because women are less likely to undertake these courses, which are `male orientated'. The policy conclusion is that to encourage less well-qualified females to undertake Higher Education, more appropriate provision is necessary that recognizes the reality of subject gender segregation.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://repec.org/res2003/Leslie.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Royal Economic Society in its series Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2003 with number 138.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 04 Jun 2003
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2003:138

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Office of the Secretary-General, School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AL, UK
    Phone: +44 1334 462479
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/society/annualconf.asp
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: gender; discrimination; Higher Education;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2003:138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.