IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ebg/heccah/1041.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Asset Divestment as a Response to Media Attacks in Stigmatized Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Durand , Rodolphe
  • Vergne , Jean-Philippe

Abstract

In stigmatized industries characterized by social contestation, hostile audiences, and distancing between industry insiders and outsiders, firms facing media attacks follow different strategies from firms in uncontested industries. Because firms avoid publicizing their tainted-sector membership, when threatened, they can respond by divesting assets from that industry. The authors' analyses of the arms industry demonstrate that media attacks on the focal firm and its peers both increase the likelihood of divestment for the focal firm. Specifically, attacks on the focal firm are the most consequential, followed by attacks on peers in the same industry subcategory, and by attacks on peers in different subcategories. These findings shed new light on divestment as a response to media attacks in stigmatized industries and lead the authors to rethink impression management theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Durand , Rodolphe & Vergne , Jean-Philippe, 2014. "Asset Divestment as a Response to Media Attacks in Stigmatized Industries," HEC Research Papers Series 1041, HEC Paris.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2415019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bryant Ashley Hudson & Karen D. W. Patterson & Thomas J. Roulet & Wesley S. Helms & Kimberly Elsbach, 2022. "Organizational Stigma: Taking Stock and Opening New Areas for Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1899-1914, December.
    2. Christopher Groening & Vamsi K. Kanuri, 2018. "Investor Reactions to Concurrent Positive and Negative Stakeholder News," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(4), pages 833-856, June.
    3. Grougiou, Vassiliki & Dedoulis, Emmanouil & Leventis, Stergios, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Organizational Stigma: The Case of “Sin” Industries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 905-914.
    4. Aranda Gutierrez, Ana, 2016. "Thank you for (not) smoking : Essays on organizational theory and strategy in a contested industry," Other publications TiSEM ec7e4803-0702-496c-8b36-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Coudounaris, Dafnis N. & Orero-Blat, María & Rodríguez-García, María, 2020. "Three decades of subsidiary exits: Parent firm financial performance and moderators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 408-422.
    6. Alessandro Piazza & Fabrizio Perretti, 2015. "Categorical Stigma and Firm Disengagement: Nuclear Power Generation in the United States, 1970–2000," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 724-742, June.
    7. Barkemeyer, Ralf & Faugère, Christophe & Gergaud, Olivier & Preuss, Lutz, 2020. "Media attention to large-scale corporate scandals: Hype and boredom in the age of social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 385-398.
    8. Thomas Roulet, 2019. "Les Evaluations Sociales en Stratégie : Légitimité, Réputation, Statut, Stigmate et Cie," Post-Print hal-01970557, HAL.
    9. Anandasivam Gopal & Brad N Greenwood, 2017. "Traders, guns, and money: The effects of mass shootings on stock prices of firearm manufacturers in the U.S," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Jia, Ming & Zhang, Zhe, 2016. "What influences the duration of negative impacts from organizational deviance on other innocent firms?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2517-2530.
    11. Fabrizio Ferraro, 2019. "Going political? Towards deliberative corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(1), pages 3-20, March.
    12. George Ferns & Kenneth Amaeshi & Aliette Lambert, 2019. "Drilling their Own Graves: How the European Oil and Gas Supermajors Avoid Sustainability Tensions Through Mythmaking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 201-231, August.
    13. Thomas Roulet, 2015. "“What Good is Wall Street?” Institutional Contradiction and the Diffusion of the Stigma over the Finance Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 389-402, August.
    14. Cornelissen Joep P. & Rodolphe Durand & Fiss Peer & Lammers John C. & Vaara Eero, 2015. "Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis," Post-Print hal-02276731, HAL.
    15. Shon R. Hiatt & W. Chad Carlos, 2019. "From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent U.S. biodiesel market," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 865-893, June.
    16. Jean-Philippe Vergne & Colette Depeyre, 2015. "How do firms adapt? A fuzzy-set analysis of the role of cognition and capabilities in U.S. defense firms’ responses to 9/11," Post-Print hal-01274005, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    stigma; impression management; divestment; media; categories; reputation; defense industry;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antoine Haldemann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hecpafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.