IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/65829.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Renewable Energy Adoption in Germany - Drivers, Barriers and Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Rode, Johannes

Abstract

This thesis deals with renewable energy adoption in Germany. We exploit a unique dataset which includes the location, date of installation and size of all photovoltaic systems, wind power plants and biomass plants for generating electricity installed in Germany through 2011. Importantly, a strong federal subsidy scheme has fostered the adoption of the three technologies since 2000. Panel data analyses on different levels of geographical aggregation allow us to identify drivers, barriers and implications of renewable energy adoption in Germany. We start our analysis by motivating the topic. Then, we review literature on technology adoption. Numerous studies confirm that technology diffusion follows an S-shaped, logistic pattern. A description of the institutional context, aggregate trends and regional differences in renewable energy adoption in Germany follows. The purpose of the subsequent section is to illuminate the spatio-temporal diffusion of photovoltaic installations in Germany quantitatively and to test whether imitation drives photovoltaics adoption. We choose an aggregate approach and employ an epidemic diffusion model which includes a spatial dimension. According to our results, imitative adoption behavior is highly localized and an important factor for the adoption of photovoltaic systems. In the following section, we change our focus on spatio-temporal variation of peer effects, i.e., imitation, in photovoltaics adoption. We add detailed locational data on potential adopters. This data allows us to construct an individual measure of peer effects for each potential adopter. Based on a discrete choice model, we confirm again that peer effects are mostly localized. They generally occur within a radius of 500 meters. We also find that the peer effect's impact on the decision to adopt decreases over time. The next section makes use of the well-studied logistic shape of technology diffusion. The common diffusion path allows us to test whether the adoption rate of renewable energy plants differs between German NUTS-3 regions (`Landkreise und Kreisfreie Städte') in which a successful referendum against a single plant was organized and the remaining regions. We exploit the fact that referenda are mainly organized on the municipal district (`Gemeinde') level against a single plant or building area. Our analysis reveals that the adoption rate (i.e., the first difference in the diffusion level) is indeed lower in NUTS-3 regions where a referendum took place. This finding holds true for wind power and large biomass plants which are both industrial. In contrast, we do not find the same for photovoltaic installations which are mainly private, household installations. We interpret this as evidence that potential investors in wind power and large biomass plants not only avoid the municipal district where a referendum against the specific technology was organized but stay away from the whole NUTS-3 region. Finally, we turn to implications from renewable energy adoption. We estimate the effect of the diffusion of photovoltaic systems on the fraction of votes obtained by Germany's Green Party in federal elections. We take first differences and instrument adoption rates by lagged diffusion levels. We predict the diffusion levels with a logistic diffusion curve. The existing rationales for non-linearities in diffusion and the ubiquity of logistic curves ensure that our predicted instrument is orthogonal to variables that directly affect voting patterns. We find that the diffusion of domestic photovoltaic systems caused a quarter of the increment in green votes between 1998 and 2009. We confirm our findings with survey data from the German Socio-Economic Panel.

Suggested Citation

  • Rode, Johannes, 2014. "Renewable Energy Adoption in Germany - Drivers, Barriers and Implications," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 65829, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
  • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:65829
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/65829/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/4082
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rode, Johannes & Müller, Sven, 2016. "Spatio-Temporal Variation in Peer Effects - The Case of Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems in Germany," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84765, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Rode, Johannes & Müller, Sven, 2020. "I Spot, I Adopt! Peer Effects and Visibility in Solar Photovoltaic System Adoption of Households," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 119280, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Comin, Diego & Rode, Johannes, 2013. "From Green Users to Green Voters," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63678, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Rode, Johannes & Weber, Alexander, 2016. "Does localized imitation drive technology adoption? A case study on rooftop photovoltaic systems in Germany," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 38-48.
    5. Wilhelm, Matthias & Buchheim, Lukas & Watzinger, Martin, 2016. "Investment in Photovoltaics and Job Creation: Evidence from a Billion Dollar Program," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145551, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:65829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.