IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cte/wsrepe/34605.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal day-ahead offering strategy for large producers based on market price response learning

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiz Mora, Carlos
  • Alcántara Mata, Antonio

Abstract

In day-ahead electricity markets based on uniform marginal pricing, small variations in the offering and bidding curves may substantially modify the resulting market outcomes. In this work, we deal with the problem of finding the optimal offering curve for a risk-averse profit-maximizing generating company (GENCO) in a data-driven context. In particular, a large GENCO's market share may imply that her offering strategy can alter the marginalprice formation, which can be used to increase profit. We tackle this problem from a novel perspective. First, we propose a optimization-based methodology to summarize each GENCO's step-wise supply curves into a subset of representative price-energy blocks. Then, the relationship between the market price and the resulting energy block offering prices is modeled through a Bayesian linear regression approach, which also allows us to generate stochastic scenarios for the sensibility of the market towards the GENCO strategy, represented by the regression coefficient probabilistic distributions. Finally, this predictive model is embedded in the stochastic optimization model by employing a constraint learning approach. Results show how allowing the GENCO to deviate from her true marginal costs renders significant changes in her profits and the market marginal price. Furthermore,these results have also been tested in an out-of-sample validation setting, showing how this optimal offering strategy is also effective in a real-world market contest.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiz Mora, Carlos & Alcántara Mata, Antonio, 2022. "Optimal day-ahead offering strategy for large producers based on market price response learning," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 34605, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
  • Handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:34605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/rest/api/core/bitstreams/1b1c31b8-7675-4179-b0ca-a187fbebd6b7/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William E. Hart & Carl D. Laird & Jean-Paul Watson & David L. Woodruff & Gabriel A. Hackebeil & Bethany L. Nicholson & John D. Siirola, 2017. "Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-58821-6, September.
    2. Muñoz, M.A. & Pineda, S. & Morales, J.M., 2022. "A bilevel framework for decision-making under uncertainty with contextual information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Chen, Kaixuan & Lin, Jin & Song, Yonghua, 2019. "Trading strategy optimization for a prosumer in continuous double auction-based peer-to-peer market: A prediction-integration model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1121-1133.
    4. Dimitris Bertsimas & Nathan Kallus, 2020. "From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1025-1044, March.
    5. Rom'an P'erez-Santalla & Miguel Carri'on & Carlos Ruiz, 2021. "Optimal pricing for electricity retailers based on data-driven consumers' price-response," Papers 2110.02735, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corredera, Alberto & Ruiz, Carlos, 2023. "Prescriptive selection of machine learning hyperparameters with applications in power markets: Retailer’s optimal trading," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 370-388.
    2. Bernardo K. Pagnoncelli & Domingo Ramírez & Hamed Rahimian & Arturo Cifuentes, 2023. "A Synthetic Data-Plus-Features Driven Approach for Portfolio Optimization," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 187-204, June.
    3. Alcántara Mata, Antonio & Ruiz Mora, Carlos, 2022. "On data-driven chance constraint learning for mixed-integer optimization problems," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 35425, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    4. Alcántara Mata, Antonio & Ruiz Mora, Carlos, 2022. "A Neural Network-Based Distributional Constraint Learning Methodology for Mixed-Integer Stochastic Optimization," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS 36072, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    5. Keliang Wang & Leonardo Lozano & Carlos Cardonha & David Bergman, 2023. "Optimizing over an Ensemble of Trained Neural Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 652-674, May.
    6. Meng Qi & Ying Cao & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Conditional Quantile Prediction with Fixed Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1639-1658, March.
    7. Shunichi Ohmori, 2021. "A Predictive Prescription Using Minimum Volume k -Nearest Neighbor Enclosing Ellipsoid and Robust Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Nieta, Agustín A. Sánchez de la & Ilieva, Iliana & Gibescu, Madeleine & Bremdal, Bernt & Simonsen, Stig & Gramme, Eivind, 2021. "Optimal midterm peak shaving cost in an electricity management system using behind customers’ smart meter configuration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    9. Andrew Butler & Roy Kwon, 2021. "Efficient differentiable quadratic programming layers: an ADMM approach," Papers 2112.07464, arXiv.org.
    10. Liu, Congzheng & Letchford, Adam N. & Svetunkov, Ivan, 2022. "Newsvendor problems: An integrated method for estimation and optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 590-601.
    11. David E. Bernal & Zedong Peng & Jan Kronqvist & Ignacio E. Grossmann, 2022. "Alternative regularizations for Outer-Approximation algorithms for convex MINLP," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 807-842, December.
    12. Shuaian Wang & Xuecheng Tian, 2023. "A Deficiency of the Predict-Then-Optimize Framework: Decreased Decision Quality with Increased Data Size," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-9, July.
    13. Toon Vanderschueren & Robert Boute & Tim Verdonck & Bart Baesens & Wouter Verbeke, 2022. "Prescriptive maintenance with causal machine learning," Papers 2206.01562, arXiv.org.
    14. Abdullah M. Alabdullatif & Enrico H. Gerding & Alvaro Perez-Diaz, 2020. "Market Design and Trading Strategies for Community Energy Markets with Storage and Renewable Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-31, February.
    15. Andrew Butler & Roy H. Kwon, 2021. "Data-driven integration of norm-penalized mean-variance portfolios," Papers 2112.07016, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    16. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Sel, Burakhan & Minner, Stefan, 2022. "A hedging policy for seaborne forward freight markets based on probabilistic forecasts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Yikai Liu & Ruozheng Wu & Aimin Yang, 2023. "Research on Medical Problems Based on Mathematical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-26, June.
    19. Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2020. "Relative utility bounds for empirically optimal portfolios," Papers 2006.05204, arXiv.org.
    20. Robert Engel & Pablo Fernandez & Antonio Ruiz-Cortes & Aly Megahed & Juan Ojeda-Perez, 2022. "SLA-aware operational efficiency in AI-enabled service chains: challenges ahead," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 199-221, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Optimal Pricing Strategy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cte:wsrepe:34605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Poveda (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://portal.uc3m.es/portal/page/portal/dpto_estadistica .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.