Who participates in corporate income tax consolidation? Evidence from Japan
AbstractWhen a group of affiliated corporations have the option to file a single tax return based on a combined income, what types of groups would take up the option? This study empirically analyses decisions to participate in a single-jurisdiction consolidated tax filing. The data consists of 2,782 Japanese corporate groups headed by publicly-traded corporations observed over 2002-2007. Results indicate higher likelihood of participation among groups characterised by low correlation in returns among group members, high variance in returns, large number of subsidiaries, and losses accumulated in parents. The significant influence of variance and covariance of returns suggests that a consolidation scheme improves the efficiency of corporate income tax through reducing profit shifting.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University in its series AJRC Working Papers with number 1303.
Length: 36 pages
Date of creation: 2013
Date of revision:
corporate group; profit shifting; survival analysis;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
- H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
- K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ACC-2013-05-24 (Accounting & Auditing)
- NEP-ALL-2013-05-24 (All new papers)
- NEP-PBE-2013-05-24 (Public Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Thomas Eichner & Marco Runkel, 2008.
"Corporate Income Taxation of Multinationals in a General Equilibrium Model,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
2320, CESifo Group Munich.
- Eichner, Thomas & Runkel, Marco, 2011. "Corporate income taxation of multinationals in a general equilibrium model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7-8), pages 723-733, August.
- Eichner, Thomas & Runkel, Marco, 2011. "Corporate income taxation of multinationals in a general equilibrium model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 723-733.
- Michael P Devereux & Simon Loretz, 2007.
"The Effects of EU Formula Apportionment on Corporate Tax Revenues,"
0706, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
- Michael P. Devereux & Simon Loretz, 2008. "The Effects of EU Formula Apportionment on Corporate Tax Revenues," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 29(1), pages 1-33, 03.
- Lorraine Eden & Luis F Juarez Valdez & Dan Li, 2005. "Talk softly but carry a big stick: transfer pricing penalties and the market valuation of Japanese multinationals in the United States," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 36(4), pages 398-414, July.
- Thiess Buettner & Nadine Riedel & Marco Runkel, 2008.
"Strategic Consolidation under Formula Apportionment,"
0827, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
- Buettner, Thiess & Riedel, Nadine & Runkel, Marco, 2011. "Strategic Consolidation Under Formula Apportionment," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 64(2), pages 225-54, June Cita.
- Thiess Buettner & Nadine Riedel & Marco Runkel, 2008. "Strategic Consolidation under Formula Apportionment," CESifo Working Paper Series 2484, CESifo Group Munich.
- Jack Mintz, 2004. "Corporate Tax Harmonization in Europe: It's All About Compliance," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 221-234, 03.
- Jack Mintz & Michael Smart, 2001.
"Income Shifting, Investment, and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence from Provincial Taxation in Canada,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
554, CESifo Group Munich.
- Mintz, Jack & Smart, Michael, 2004. "Income shifting, investment, and tax competition: theory and evidence from provincial taxation in Canada," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 1149-1168, June.
- Jack M. Mintz & Michael Smart, 2001. "Income Shifting, Investment, and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence from Provincial Taxation in Canada," International Tax Program Papers 0402, International Tax Program, Institute for International Business, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, revised Apr 2003.
- Kazuki Onji & David Vera, 2008.
"Tax Law Asymmetries and Income Shifting : Evidence From Japanese Capital Keiretsu,"
Finance Working Papers
21966, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
- Onji Kazuki & Vera David, 2010. "Tax Law Asymmetries and Income Shifting: Evidence from Japanese Capital Keiretsu," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-35, January.
- Kazuki Onji & David Vera, 2008. "Tax Law Asymmetries and Income Shifting: Evidence From Japanese Capital Keiretsu," Asia Pacific Economic Papers 371, Australia-Japan Research Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
- Masanori Orihara, 2013. "Business Group Taxation and R&D Activities," Discussion papers ron254, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Akira Kinefuchi).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.