IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpb/discus/360.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

SMOOTHIES: A Toolbox for the Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother

Author

Listed:
  • Joris de Wind

Abstract

In this paper, I present a new toolbox that implements the exact nonlinear and non-Gaussian Kalman smoother for a wide class of discrete-time state space models, including models with implicit functions and equality constraints. Read also CPB Discussion Paper 359. The technical details are presented in an accompanying paper, while the toolbox is documented in the current one. The toolbox, which is built on top of Dynare, is very user-friendly and only requires the user to provide the state space model to be analyzed, while the toolbox automatically solves the smoothing problem. The toolbox can also be applied for conditional forecasting, which is demonstrated on the basis of a nonlinear macroeconomic model with forward-looking variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Joris de Wind, 2017. "SMOOTHIES: A Toolbox for the Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother," CPB Discussion Paper 360, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpb:discus:360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/omnidownload/CPB-Discussion-Paper-360-SMOOTHIES-A-Toolbox-for-the-Exact-Nonlinear-and-Non-Gaussian-Kalman-Smoother.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joris de Wind, 2017. "Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother for State Space Models with Implicit Functions and Equality Constraints," CPB Discussion Paper 359.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Peter Hollinger, "undated". "The Stacked-Time Simulator in TROLL: A Robust Algorithm for Solving Forward-Looking Models," Computing in Economics and Finance 1996 _026, Society for Computational Economics.
    3. Joris de Wind, 2017. "Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother for State Space Models with Implicit Functions and Equality Constraints," CPB Discussion Paper 359, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Juillard, Michel, 1996. "Dynare : a program for the resolution and simulation of dynamic models with forward variables through the use of a relaxation algorithm," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9602, CEPREMAP.
    5. Adjemian, Stéphane & Bastani, Houtan & Juillard, Michel & Karamé, Fréderic & Maih, Junior & Mihoubi, Ferhat & Mutschler, Willi & Perendia, George & Pfeifer, Johannes & Ratto, Marco & Villemot, Sébasti, 2011. "Dynare: Reference Manual Version 4," Dynare Working Papers 1, CEPREMAP, revised Mar 2021.
    6. Sandef, J. & Don, F. J. H. & van den Berg, P. J. C. M., 1984. "Adjustment of projections to recent observations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-2), pages 153-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joris de Wind, 2017. "Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother for State Space Models with Implicit Functions and Equality Constraints," CPB Discussion Paper 359.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Joris de Wind, 2017. "Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother for State Space Models with Implicit Functions and Equality Constraints," CPB Discussion Paper 359, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joris de Wind, 2017. "SMOOTHIES: A Toolbox for the Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother," CPB Discussion Paper 360.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Richard Pierse, 2006. "Optimal control in nonlinear models: a generalised Gauss-Newton algorithm with analytic derivatives," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0906, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    3. Juillard, Michel & Laxton, Douglas & McAdam, Peter & Pioro, Hope, 1998. "An algorithm competition: First-order iterations versus Newton-based techniques," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(8-9), pages 1291-1318, August.
    4. Gomes, Sandra, 2018. "Euro area structural reforms in times of a global crisis," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 28-45.
    5. Ajevskis Viktors, 2017. "Semi-global solutions to DSGE models: perturbation around a deterministic path," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 1-28, April.
    6. Joris de Wind, 2017. "Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother for State Space Models with Implicit Functions and Equality Constraints," CPB Discussion Paper 359, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    7. Philippe Bacchetta & Kenza Benhima & Yannick Kalantzis, 2013. "Capital Controls with International Reserve Accumulation: Can This Be Optimal?," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(3), pages 229-262, July.
    8. Joris de Wind, 2017. "Exact Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Kalman Smoother for State Space Models with Implicit Functions and Equality Constraints," CPB Discussion Paper 359.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    9. Peter Hollinger, 2000. "Beyond Newton: Robust Methods For Solving Large Nonlinear Models In Troll," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 308, Society for Computational Economics.
    10. Flint Brayton, 2011. "Two practical algorithms for solving rational expectations models," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2011-44, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    11. Richard Pierse, 2006. "Terminal conditions in forward-looking economic models," School of Economics Discussion Papers 1006, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    12. Douglas Laxton, 2008. "Getting to Know the Global Economy Model and Its Philosophy," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 55(2), pages 213-242, June.
    13. Luca Marchiori & I-Ling Shen & Frédéric Docquier, 2013. "Brain Drain In Globalization: A General Equilibrium Analysis From The Sending Countries' Perspective," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(2), pages 1582-1602, April.
    14. Christoph Görtz & John D. Tsoukalas, 2013. "Sector Specific News Shocks in Aggregate and Sectoral Fluctuations," CESifo Working Paper Series 4269, CESifo.
    15. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2016_016 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Federico Di Pace & Matthias Hertweck, 2019. "Labor Market Frictions, Monetary Policy, and Durable Goods," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 32, pages 274-304, April.
    17. Eyal Argov & Emanuel Barnea & Alon Binyamini & Eliezer Borenstein & David Elkayam & Irit Rozenshtrom, 2012. "MOISE: A DSGE Model for the Israeli Economy," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2012.06, Bank of Israel.
    18. Anella Munro, 2014. "Exchange rates, expected returns and risk," Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper Series DP2014/01, Reserve Bank of New Zealand.
    19. John Bound & Breno Braga & Joseph M. Golden & Gaurav Khanna, 2015. "Recruitment of Foreigners in the Market for Computer Scientists in the United States," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(S1), pages 187-223.
    20. Tobias Cwik, 2012. "Fiscal consolidation using the example of Germany," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2012-80, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    21. John B. Taylor & Volker Wieland, 2012. "Surprising Comparative Properties of Monetary Models: Results from a New Model Database," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(3), pages 800-816, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • J64 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpb:discus:360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cpbgvnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.