IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cop/wpaper/g-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050: What it means for the Australian Economy, Industries and Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Adams

Abstract

This paper focuses on modelling with the Victoria University Regional Model (VURM) of the impacts on the Australian economy and its industries and regions, of achieving net zero greenhouse emissions by 2050. This is timely, being published at the time of the Glasgow Climate Change Conference, at which Australia has committed to achieving net-zero by 2050, albeit with little detail yet about how it is to be achieved and what its impacts will be on different industries and regions. At the national level we find that despite the requirement for deep cuts in emissions, the Australian economy continues to grow strongly in terms of production (real GDP) and employment. The loss of real GDP in 2050 due to decarbonisation is projected to be around 1 per cent, or close to $30 billion (in 2021 prices). Our previous assessment in 2014 estimated a loss of 3.8 per cent, or nearly $150 billion (2021 prices). This time the negative GDP result is much smaller because the abatement task is easier due, in part, to lower than previously expected renewable generation costs and faster than previously expected penetration of electric vehicles for both light and heavy transport. For industries, decarbonisation provides an impetus to some, especially industries producing electricity from renewable generation and industries directly and indirectly associated with forestry and wood production. But, there are some industries for which zero-emissions restrains output and employment. Examples include coal-based electricity generation and coal mining. The pattern of decarbonisation effects across states and territories reflects the pattern of industry effects. Overall, real Gross State Product (GSP) is projected to fall relative to Base Case values in all states except Tasmania and South Australia. The state projected to experience the largest decline is Queensland because of an over-representation of coal mining, broadacre agriculture and coal generated electricity in its economy. For Australia as a whole, vulnerable industries noted above account for less than 4 per cent of aggregate employment. However, some sub-state regions are much more heavily dependent on the vulnerable industries. We identify 9 out of 88 sub-state (SA4) regions as vulnerable in terms of potential loss of employment. These include coal-dependent regions such as Hunter in NSW, Fitzroy in QLD and Gippsland in VIC.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Adams, 2021. "Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050: What it means for the Australian Economy, Industries and Regions," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-324, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:cop:wpaper:g-324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.copsmodels.com/ftp/workpapr/g-324.pdf
    File Function: Initial version, 2021-11
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.copsmodels.com/elecpapr/g-324.htm
    File Function: Local abstract: may link to additional material.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Adams & Janine Dixon & Mark Horridge, 2015. "The Victoria University Regional Model (VURM): Technical Documentation, Version 1.0," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-254, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul J. Burke, 2023. "On the way out: Government revenues from fossil fuels in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Philip Adams & Louise Roos, 2023. "Economic impacts of low-carbon transport strategies for Jordan," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-339, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    3. Ravanji, Abdolvahab & Lee, Ann & Mohammadpour, Javad & Cheng, Shaokoon, 2023. "Critical review on thermohydraulic performance enhancement in channel flows: A comparative study of pin fins," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janine Dixon, 2016. "Workforce Adaptation to the Cessation of Motor Vehicle Manufacturing in Australia," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(4), pages 301-315, December.
    2. J.M. Dixon & J. Nassios, 2018. "The Effectiveness of Investment Stimulus Policies in Australia," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-282, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    3. Robson, Edward N. & Wijayaratna, Kasun P. & Dixit, Vinayak V., 2018. "A review of computable general equilibrium models for transport and their applications in appraisal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 31-53.
    4. Xianglong Liu & Jason Nassios & James Giesecke, 2022. "Oil Supply Shocks and Tax Policy Responses in Australia: Insights from a Dynamic CGE Framework," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-336, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    5. Janine M. Dixon & Jason Nassios, 2018. "A Dynamic Economy-wide Analysis of Company Tax Cuts in Australia," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-287, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    6. Ghaith, Ziad & Kulshreshtha, Suren & Natcher, David & Cameron, Bobby Thomas, 2021. "Regional Computable General Equilibrium models: A review," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 710-724.
    7. Nassios, J. & Giesecke, J.A. & Dixon, P.B. & Rimmer, M.T., 2019. "Modelling the allocative efficiency of landowner taxation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 111-123.
    8. Xianglong Locky Liu & James Giesecke & Jason Nassios, 2023. "The Economic Effects of an International Student Levy Under Alternative Price Elasticity Assumptions," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-343, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    9. James A. Giesecke & Nhi H. Tran, 2018. "The National and Regional Consequences of Australia's Goods and Services Tax," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(306), pages 255-275, September.
    10. Janine M. Dixon & Philip D. Adams & Nicholas Sheard, 2021. "The impacts of COVID‐19 containment on the Australian economy and its agricultural and mining industries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(4), pages 776-801, October.
    11. Wang, Jiayu & Quiggin, John & Wittwer, Glyn, 2019. "The rebound effect of the Australian proposed light vehicle fuel efficiency standards," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 73-84.
    12. Hodges, Cedric, 2020. "The future of Australia’s thermal coal industry in a low carbon environment," Conference papers 333232, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Jason Nassios & John Madden & James Giesecke & Janine Dixon & Nhi Tran & Peter Dixon & Maureen Rimmer & Philip Adams & John Freebairn, 2019. "The economic impact and efficiency of state and federal taxes in Australia," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-289, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CGE; Climate policy; Industries; Regions; Employment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cop:wpaper:g-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Horridge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cpmonau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.