IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cns/cnscwp/202311.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The economic impact of the tourism sector on the overall Italian economy: An Input-Output Approach

Author

Listed:
  • F. Antolini
  • S. Cesarini
  • G. Garau

Abstract

Defining the tourism sector poses a considerable challenge, owing to the diversified nature of its economic activities, which encompass services, industries, and agriculture. The extent of tourism s influence varies substantially across these sectors, making it arduous to gauge its contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP). To surmount this challenge, the satellite accounting method (TSA) is typically used to establish the spread of tourism across different economic activities and subsequently determine its contribution to final production. A range of approaches, including impact models, cost-benefit models, social accounting matrices (SAMs), and computable general equilibrium (CGE), have been utilized to evaluate the economic ramifications of tourism (see Frechtling, 2009; Madsen and Zhang, 2010; Rossouw and Saayman, 2011; and Dwyer et al., 2007). However, since 2010, TSAs have become, the standard tool to measure the direct economic contributions of tourism (Cañada, 2013; Dwyer et al., op.cit.). Within the framework of satellite accounting (TSA), the expenditure approach is typically adopted, although it should not be regarded as the exclusive method. Given that tourism expenditure is the key metric used to determine tourism s contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) in the satellite accounts, it is essential to ascertain which aggregate is considered within the Italian satellite accounting framework. Other countries approaches to this matter generally rely on industry data (Structural Business Statistics), input-output tables in the System of National Accounts (SNA), and/or visitor surveys (Pham and Dwyer, 2013). The TSA has the advantage to identify industry outputs that are consumed or purchased for tourism as well as their contribution to key macroeconomic indicators such as GDP, national income, and employment (Frechtling, 2010; Jones et al., 2009). The relationship between tourism and other economic sectors remains incompletely understood since tourism is not identified as a separate industry in a country s input-output tables. Several studies have investigated the dominant economic activity aggregated in "homogeneous production branches or activity branches," without explicitly distinguishing tourism activity from non-tourism activity, such as in the case of the restaurant industry. The present study seeks to address this issue by considering the tourism industry as it is defined in the Tourism Satellite Accounts and incorporating this classification into the Input-Output (I-O) framework. To achieve this objective, the economic activities pertaining to the tourism industry, as delineated within the framework of satellite accounting, were consolidated within the Input-Output (I-O) tables under the designation of the "tourism sector." In this process, the original economic activities were appropriately weighted by employing the tourism coefficients derived from satellite accounting. Concurrently, the economic activities within the tourism industry that were not directly associated with tourism were encompassed within the non-tourism sector. The latest Input-Output scheme published by ISTAT for the year 2019 was used for this purpose. To estimate the overall impact of tourism on employment, income, and production by calculating multipliers, it was necessary to first compute technical coefficients for the tourism sector. Subsequently, the study presents forward and backward linkage coefficients to illustrate how variations in the tourism sectors would influence the value-added , production, employment, and income of the entire national economy. This could prove valuable for economic policy planning, particularly for policymakers who seek to measure the impact of the tourism industry on other sectors. However, given that the contribution of the tourism industry to GDP is determined using the expenditure approach, the paper begins by focusing on a preliminary analysis of discrepancies in data pertaining to tourism spending. This constitutes a key aspect in understanding the quality of the tourism coefficient used to derive the tourism sector in the I-O scheme, and subsequently, the impact of the tourism industry as an industry was calculated by aggregating the activity branches.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Antolini & S. Cesarini & G. Garau, 2023. "The economic impact of the tourism sector on the overall Italian economy: An Input-Output Approach," Working Paper CRENoS 202311, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
  • Handle: RePEc:cns:cnscwp:202311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crenos.unica.it/crenos/node/7393
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://crenos.unica.it/crenos/sites/default/files/wp-23-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young-Tae Chang & Hyosoo Park & Shu-Min Liu & Younghoon Roh, 2016. "Economic impact of cruise industry using regional input--output analysis: a case study of Incheon," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Fabrizio Antolini & Laura Grassini, 2020. "Methodological problems in the economic measurement of tourism: the need for new sources of information," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(5), pages 1769-1780, December.
    3. Larry Dwyer & Peter Forsyth & Ray Spurr, 2007. "Contrasting the Uses of TSAs and CGE Models: Measuring Tourism Yield and Productivity," Tourism Economics, , vol. 13(4), pages 537-551, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun, Wang Ki & Lee, Min-Kyu & Choi, Jae Young, 2018. "Impact of the smart port industry on the Korean national economy using input-output analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 480-493.
    2. Doris Chenguang Wu & Jingyan Liu & Haiyan Song & Anyu Liu & Hui Fu, 2019. "Developing a Web-based regional tourism satellite account (TSA) information system," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(1), pages 67-84, February.
    3. Pilar Barra & Bartolomé Marco & Cristina Cachero, 2019. "Economic impact of language tourism on mature sun and sand destinations: The case of Alicante (Spain)," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(6), pages 923-941, September.
    4. Andrés Artal-Tur & José Miguel Navarro-Azorín & José María Ramos-Parreño, 2020. "Measuring the economic contribution of tourism to destinations within an input-output framework: some methodological issues," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 19(3), pages 243-265, September.
    5. Aparco, Elvis & Chang, Víctor, 2018. "Medición del impacto económico de las terminales portuarias del Callao: Un análisis mediante la Matriz Insumo - Producto/Measuring the Economic Impact in Port Terminals of Callao: An Analysis using In," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 36, pages 743-764, Septiembr.
    6. Fidel Martínez-Roget & Ewa Pawlowska & Xosé A. Rodríguez, 2013. "The Economic Impact of Academic Tourism in Galicia, Spain," Tourism Economics, , vol. 19(5), pages 1139-1153, October.
    7. Tsionas, Efthymios G. & George Assaf, A., 2014. "Short-run and long-run performance of international tourism: Evidence from Bayesian dynamic models," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 22-36.
    8. Sadyrbek Kozhokulov & Xi Chen & Degang Yang & Gulnura Issanova & Kanat Samarkhanov & Selvina Aliyeva, 2019. "Assessment of Tourism Impact on the Socio-Economic Spheres of the Issyk-Kul Region (Kyrgyzstan)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Erhan Aslanoğlu & Arda Balakan, 2016. "An analysis of cruise tourism on Turkish economy; a case study for Istanbul and Barcelona ports," Yildiz Social Science Review, Yildiz Technical University, vol. 2(2), pages 1-28.
    10. Jinsoo Park & EuiBeom Jeong, 2019. "Service Quality in Tourism: A Systematic Literature Review and Keyword Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Setiawan PRIATMOKO & Moaaz KABIL & Robert MAGDA & Edit PALLAS & Lorant Denes DAVID, 2021. "Bali And The Next Proposed Tourism Development Model In Indonesia," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 161-180, June.
    12. Chang, Young-Tae & Lee, Suhyung & Park, Hyosoo (Kevin), 2017. "Efficiency analysis of major cruise lines," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 78-88.
    13. Jeroen Klijs & Wim Heijman & Diana Korteweg Maris & Jeroen Bryon, 2012. "Criteria for Comparing Economic Impact Models of Tourism," Tourism Economics, , vol. 18(6), pages 1175-1202, December.
    14. David Alaminos & Ana León-Gómez & José Ramón Sánchez-Serrano, 2020. "A DSGE-VAR Analysis for Tourism Development and Sustainable Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    15. Oddne Skrede & Sigbjorn Landazuri Tveteraas, 2019. "Cruise spillovers to hotels and restaurants," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(8), pages 1286-1301, December.
    16. Xumao Li & Chengjin Wang & César Ducruet, 2020. "Globalization and Regionalization: Empirical Evidence from Itinerary Structure and Port Organization of World Cruise of Cunard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Liu, Anyu & Wu, Doris Chenguang, 2019. "Tourism productivity and economic growth," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 253-265.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tourism GDP; input-output analysis; tourism Industry; satellite accounts;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cns:cnscwp:202311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRENoS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crenoit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.