IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2019s-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Learning and Skills for Sustainable Development: Academic or Organizational Training?

Author

Listed:
  • Georges A. Tanguay
  • Étienne Berthold
  • Maryse Boivin

Abstract

Organizational sustainable development know-how is necessary to meet current environmental, social and economic challenges. This article follows the Education for Sustainable Development Report questioning which skills are currently in greatest demand by employers with regards to sustainable development. Aiming to better understand the duality (complementarity and substitutability) of sustainable development skills, depending on whether they are acquired through academic education or within an organization, this paper analyzes the links between the sustainable development skills sought by an organization and 1) the sustainable development actions it actually carried out, as well as 2) explanatory factors specific to the company. Based on a questionnaire survey conducted in May 2016 with 561 respondents from organizations in the province of Quebec, variables of interest were identified and measured with regards to sustainable development skills, in-house training offerings and the valorization of academic learning. The collected data allowed for the comparison of these elements with the sustainable development programs adopted internally as well as the characteristics of the various organizations (e.g. size, sector). This comparison was accomplished through a list of concrete actions, notably using chi square analysis, factor analysis, correlation and mean comparisons. The study makes four specific contributions: 1) Sustainable development skills are valued by many organizations, most often through a complementary valorization of both in-house (“internal”) training offerings as well as academic study; 2) Organizations that value the acquisition of skills in sustainable development in a complementary way stand out as the most active in their approach to sustainable development; 3) The exclusive valorization of internal sustainable development training underpins a certain level of organizational engagement with these topics, whereas the exclusive valorization of academically obtained skills reveals a weaker concretization of sustainable development, and therefore a need to compensate for a gap and 4) Gaps are highlighted between actions and the valorization of sustainable development skills, according to the characteristics of the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Georges A. Tanguay & Étienne Berthold & Maryse Boivin, 2019. "Learning and Skills for Sustainable Development: Academic or Organizational Training?," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-13, CIRANO.
    • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2019s-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2019s-13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amandine Pinget & Rachel Bocquet & Caroline Mothe, 2015. "Barriers to Environmental Innovation in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from French Firms," Post-Print hal-01300837, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Doloreux & Luisa Kraft, 2019. "A Taxonomy of Eco-Innovation Types in SMEs: Exploring Different Firm Profiles in the Canadian Wine Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Natalia Sytnik & Maryna Kravchenko, 2021. "Application of knowledge management tools: Comparative analysis of small, medium, and large enterprises," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 17(4), pages 121-156.
    3. Magali A. Delmas & Sanja Pekovic, 2018. "Corporate Sustainable Innovation and Employee Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1071-1088, July.
    4. Mihaela PÃCESILÃ & Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU, 2017. "Systematic Literature Review On Eco-Innovation Determinants," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(3), pages 30-44, September.
    5. Joseph Bakos & Michele Siu & Adalberto Orengo & Narges Kasiri, 2020. "An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & medium‐sized enterprises: Patterns and trends," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1285-1296, March.
    6. Pinget, Amandine, 2016. "Spécificités des déterminants des innovations environnementales : une approche appliquée aux PME [Specificities of determinants for environmental innovation : an approach applied to SMEs]," MPRA Paper 80108, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Ben Arfi, Wissal & Hikkerova, Lubica & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2018. "External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 210-220.
    8. Chien, Fengsheng & Ngo, Quang-Thanh & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Chau, Ka Yin & Iram, Robina, 2021. "Assessing the mechanism of barriers towards green finance and public spending in small and medium enterprises from developed countries," MPRA Paper 109668, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Păcesilă, Mihaela & Ciocoiu, Carmen Nadia, 2017. "Eco-Innovation and its Determinants: A Review of the Emerging Literature," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2017), Dubrovnik, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 7-9 September 2017, pages 134-144, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    10. Dan Wang & Ruishi Si & Shah Fahad, 2023. "Evaluating the small and medium sized enterprises motivating factors and influencing barriers about adoption of green practices," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3029-3041, April.
    11. Arien Arianti Gunawan & Jose Bloemer & Allard C. R. van Riel & Caroline Essers, 2022. "Institutional Barriers and Facilitators of Sustainability for Indonesian Batik SMEs: A Policy Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Sajid Ullah & Naveed Ahmad & Farman Ullah Khan & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu, 2021. "Mapping Interactions among Green Innovations Barriers in Manufacturing Industry Using Hybrid Methodology: Insights from a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Fengsheng Chien & Hafiz Waqas Kamran & Muhammad Atif Nawaz & Nguyen Ngoc Thach & Pham Dinh Long & Zulfiqar Ali Baloch, 2022. "Assessing the prioritization of barriers toward green innovation: small and medium enterprises Nexus," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1897-1927, February.
    14. Amandine Pinget & Rachel Bocquet, 2017. "Spécificités des sources de connaissances pour l'innovation environnementale des PME," Post-Print hal-01699651, HAL.
    15. Riedel, Franziska & Gorbach, Gregor & Kost, Christoph, 2021. "Barriers to internal carbon pricing in German companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    16. Elisabet Aguado & Adelheid Holl, 2018. "Differences of Corporate Environmental Responsibility in Small and Medium Enterprises: Spain and Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Alenka Baggia & Matjaž Maletič & Anja Žnidaršič & Alenka Brezavšček, 2019. "Drivers and Outcomes of Green IS Adoption in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Pupiales, Luis Eduardo Benavides & Delgado, Sandra Lucía Bolaños, 2020. "Barreras de innovación en PYMES: una aproximación a través de una revisión sistemática de literatura," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 21(1), pages 221-237, January.
    19. Malesios, Chrisovalantis & De, Debashree & Moursellas, Andreas & Dey, Prasanta & Evangelinos, Konstantinos, 2019. "Review of Statistical Modeling Approaches for Sustainability Analysis of Small and Medium sized Enterprises," MPRA Paper 93028, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Shamim Akhtar & José Moleiro Martins & Pedro Neves Mata & Hongyun Tian & Shumaila Naz & Maria Dâmaso & Ricardo Simões Santos, 2021. "Assessing the Relationship between Market Orientation and Green Product Innovation: The Intervening Role of Green Self-Efficacy and Moderating Role of Resource Bricolage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Skills; Sustainable Development; Organizations; Academic Education;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2019s-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.