Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Productivity of the English National Health Service 2003-4 to 2009-10

Contents:

Author Info

  • Chris Bojke

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK)

  • Adriana Castelli

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK)

  • Rosalind Goudie

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK)

  • Andrew Street

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK)

  • Padraic Ward

    (Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK)

Abstract

A new research study reveals that the productivity of the NHS in England has been broadly constant over the last seven years, increasing by an average of 0.1 per cent per year. The most detailed and comprehensive information available was used to compare growth in the total amount of resources (input) used to produce health care provided to NHS patients (output). The research shows that between 2003/4 to 2009/10 the number of staff has increased by 18 per cent, buildings and equipment by 24 per cent and all other inputs, such as clinical supplies and energy costs, by 76 per cent. There has also been a corresponding increase in both the quantity and quality of output. The number of patients treated in hospital increased from 12.1m to 15.6m; outpatient attendances from 50m to 77m; community care contacts from 76m to 92m; and primary care consultations from 262m to 300m. Over the same period, hospital survival rates improved from 99.4 per cent to 99.8 per cent for elective patients and from 95 per cent to 96 per cent for non-electives. Average inpatient waiting times fell from 78 to 57 days, reaching a low of 51 days in 2008/9. Outpatient waiting times fell from 58 days to 24 days. All in all, growth in activity and changes in quality have tracked the growth in inputs, implying that productivity has been flat over the seven year period.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.york.ac.uk/media/che/documents/papers/researchpapers/CHERP76_Productivity_of_the_English_NHS.pdf
File Function: First version, 2012
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Centre for Health Economics, University of York in its series Working Papers with number 076cherp.

as in new window
Length: 53 pages
Date of creation: Mar 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:chy:respap:76cherp

Contact details of provider:
Postal: York Y010 5DD
Phone: (01904) 321401
Fax: (0)1904 323759
Email:
Web page: http://www.york.ac.uk/che
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Castelli, Adriana & Laudicella, Mauro & Street, Andrew & Ward, Padraic, 2011. "Getting out what we put in: productivity of the English National Health Service," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(03), pages 313-335, June.
  2. Adriana Castelli & Mauro Laudicella & Andrew Street, 2008. "Measuring NHS Output Growth," Working Papers 043cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chy:respap:76cherp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frances Sharp).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.