IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/indrel/qt6pv144kk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Shukko (Employee Transfers) and Tacit Knowledge Exchange in Japanese Supply Networks: The Electronics Industry Case

Author

Listed:
  • Lincoln, James R.
  • Ahmadjian, Christina

Abstract

Purchase-supply relations in Japanese electronics are less close and cooperative than in the automobile industry and involve less formal knowledge sharing. Our interviews with a number of major Japanese electronics firms reveal that suppliers are less involved in manufacturers' product development processes and are brought in at later stages. However, too much attention to such formal knowledge sharing events may blind one to patterns of cross-firm learning and sharing that transfer the most tacit kinds of organizational knowledge, such as the normative and affective elements of a corporate culture. Using interview information, we discuss the phenomenon of shukko (employee transfers) among Japanese companies. Shukko is often viewed as a downsizing device, although firms claim they do it mostly to exchange knowledge with partners. Our view is that it serves both purposes. However, the volume of shukko varies with the electronics firm. It is most common where customers and suppliers are bound to one another in equity and other "keiretsu" relationships. Shukko is an effective mechanism of cross-firm socialization, so we might expect that firms that shukko extensively are also more likely to develop network-wide cultures of obligation and reciprocity. An example supporting that hypothesis is "Kigyo Denki," our pseudonym for a large, old-line electronics company with strong ties to one of Japan's "big-six" horizontal keiretsu groups. However, some companies, such as Matsushita, have a corporate culture that appears to coordinate and motivate suppliers even in the absence of shukko and other keiretsu ties.

Suggested Citation

  • Lincoln, James R. & Ahmadjian, Christina, 2000. "Shukko (Employee Transfers) and Tacit Knowledge Exchange in Japanese Supply Networks: The Electronics Industry Case," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt6pv144kk, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt6pv144kk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6pv144kk.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asanuma, Banri, 1989. "Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina L. Ahmadjian & James R. Lincoln, 2001. "Keiretsu, Governance, and Learning: Case Studies in Change from the Japanese Automotive Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(6), pages 683-701, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andersson, Thomas, 1991. "Approaches to Partnerships Causing Asymmetries Between Japan and the West," Working Paper Series 320, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Feb 1992.
    2. Giacomo Calzolari & Leonardo Felli & Johannes Koenen & Giancarlo Spagnolo & Konrad O. Stahl, 2021. "Relational Contracts and Trust in a High-Tech Industry," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_316, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    3. Jörn Block & Christian Fisch & Kenta Ikeuchi & Masatoshi Kato, 2022. "Trademarks as an indicator of regional innovation: evidence from Japanese prefectures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 190-209, February.
    4. Göller, Daniel & Stremitzer, Alexander, 2014. "Breach remedies inducing hybrid investments," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 26-38.
    5. Noorderhaven, N.G. & Nooteboom, B. & Berger, H., 1995. "Exploring determinants of perceived interfirm dependence in industrial supplier relations," Discussion Paper 1995-115, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Glenn Hoetker & Anand Swaminathan & Will Mitchell, 2007. "Modularity and the Impact of Buyer-Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 178-191, February.
    7. Oliver Gürtler, 2010. "Haggling for Rents, Relational Contracts, and the Theory of the Firm," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 62(4), pages 359-377, October.
    8. Saeki, Yasuo & Horak, Sven, 2013. "The role of trust in cultivating relation-specific skills: The case of a multinational automotive supplier in Japan and Germany," Working Papers on East Asian Studies 95/2013, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of East Asian Studies IN-EAST.
    9. Eiji Yamamura, 2012. "Government Size and Trust," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(1), pages 31-56, December.
    10. Daniel Göller, 2014. "Expectation Damages and Bilateral Cooperative Investments," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 473-498.
    11. W. Bentley MacLeod & James M. Malcomson, 2023. "Implicit Contracts, Incentive Compatibility, and Involuntary Unemployment: Thirty Years On," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 179(3-4), pages 470-499.
    12. Belderbos, Rene & Carree, Martin, 2002. "The Location of Japanese Investments in China: Agglomeration Effects, Keiretsu, and Firm Heterogeneity," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 194-211, June.
    13. Ricard Gil & Myongjin Kim & Giorgio Zanarone, 2019. "Relational Contracting in Developed Economies: Lessons From Slot Exchanges in the US Airline Industry," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 411-421, September.
    14. Hideshi Itoh & Hodaka Morita, 2006. "Formal Contracts, Relational Contracts, and the Holdup Problem," CESifo Working Paper Series 1786, CESifo.
    15. Yamamoto, Satoshi & Kan, Viktoriya & Bartnik, Roman, 2018. "Going Abroad to Innovate? The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Foreign Business Expansion for Japanese Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturers," CIS Discussion paper series 668, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    16. José Sousa & Xavier Fairise, 2014. "On the value of partial commitment for cooperative investment in buyer–supplier relationship," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 151-171, March.
    17. David W. Edgington, 1999. "Firms, Governments and Innovation in the Chukyo Region of Japan," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(2), pages 305-339, February.
    18. Garrison, Gary & Wakefield, Robin L. & Kim, Sanghyun, 2015. "The effects of IT capabilities and delivery model on cloud computing success and firm performance for cloud supported processes and operations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 377-393.
    19. yamamura, eiji, 2008. "The influence of government size on economic growth and life satisfaction. A case study from Japan," MPRA Paper 10835, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. James M. Malcomson, 2016. "Relational Incentive Contracts With Persistent Private Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 317-346, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Japan; suppliers; knowledge;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt6pv144kk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.