Andreas Stephan () (Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia)
Abstract
The combination of leniency programmes, high sanctions, complaints from customers and private actions for damages, has proven very successful at uncovering and punishing cartel agreements in the US. Countless jurisdictions are being encouraged to adopt these ‘conventional’ enforcement tools, in the absence of an international competition authority. The purpose of this paper is to widen the debate on cartel enforcement by identifying three issues which can undermine their effectiveness in some jurisdictions: (1) Corruption and organised crime; (2) Social norms that are sympathetic to collusive practices; (3) Collectivist business cultures built on personal relationships.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia in its series Working Papers with number
08-29.
Find related papers by JEL classification: D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: