This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Different Rules for Different Owners: Does a Non-Competing Patentee have a Right to Exclude? A Study of Post-eBay Cases

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Sujitha Subramanian () (Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia)
Abstract

Courts have traditionally granted injunctive relief ‘automatically’ upon finding infringement of valid patents on the basis that it is the essence of the patent right to exclude others. But the U.S. Supreme Court signalled a change in 2006 when they vacated the Federal Court’s order granting injunction against eBay for willfully infringing valid patents of MercExchange. The ruling comes at a time when the debate on what have pejoratively been called ‘patent trolls’ have taken centre stage. This paper examines the issues connected to patent trolls and analyses cases post-eBay to study the effect that eBay has had on patent infringement litigation. The analysis shows that the economic status of the patentee and the nature of the patent itself can adversely affect the exclusive rights granted by the patent. This is because non-competing patentees and a patent which covers only a small component of the overall product are less likely to obtain an injunctive relief. Denial of injunctive relief results in judicially-instituted compulsory licensing of patents which dramatically scales down the bargaining power of the patentee during licensing fee negotiations. Wrongly being adjudged a ‘troll’ can have dramatic effects on the incentive for investment and innovation. Consequently, the paper argues that acceptance of the concept of patent ‘troll’ is likely to result in more harm to innovation that otherwise.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP07-18.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 500 Can't connect to ccpweb.mgt.uea.ac.uk:80 (connect: timeout) (http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP07-18.pdf [302 Found]--> http://ccpweb.mgt.uea.ac.uk/publicfiles/workingpapers/CCP07-18.pdf). If this is indeed the case, please notify (Cheryl Whittkaer)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia in its series Working Papers with number 07-18.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 58 pages
Date of creation: Sep 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ccp:wpaper:wp07-18

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Norwich, NR4 7TJ
Phone: +44(0)1603 593715
Fax: +44(0)1603 591622
Email:
Web page: http://www.ccp.uea.ac.uk
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Cheryl Whittkaer).

Related research
Keywords: Patents; patentees; right to exclude; patent trolls; compulsory licensing;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
K19 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Other
K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by encouraging others to register as authors.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.