Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Economic Organization, Distribution And The Equality Issue: The Marx-Engels Perspective

Contents:

Author Info

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    My first concern is the treatment of distribution by Marx and Engels within the general framework of ‘Historical Materialism’. To set the stage I deal briefly with their rejection of egalitarian schemes based on ‘justice’ or ‘morality’ (Section II.1),and then proceed to their objections on grounds of the impossibility of divorcing distribution from conditions of production and the related exchange system. I demonstrate first that growing inequality is accorded a strategic and essential role in the evolution of a capitalist-exchange economy (II.2). (In any event, Marx and Engels seem to have downplayed the quantitative significance for labour even of major transfers.) That the pattern of distribution could not be altered unilaterally without damaging consequences for production, is then shown to govern their hostility to schemes of Communist organization entailing wages paid according to‘equal right’ and ‘the undiminished proceeds of labour’ (II.3). In brief, Marx’s Communism in its first phase (sometimes referred to as the Socialist phase), when there remains a residual influence exerted by the preceding institution 1 , would recognize the essential inequality of labour on grounds of efficiency and growth; the celebrated dictum ‘from each according to his abilities to each according to his needs’ applied only in a utopian phase. Engels’ rendition of these themes is approached in terms of his critique of Duhring (III).

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www1.carleton.ca/economics/ccms/wp-content/ccms-files/cep02-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Carleton University, Department of Economics in its series Carleton Economic Papers with number 02-05.

    as in new window
    Length: 55 pages
    Date of creation: 06 Feb 2002
    Date of revision:
    Publication status: Published: Carleton Economic Papers
    Handle: RePEc:car:carecp:02-05

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa Ontario, K1S 5B6 Canada
    Phone: 1-613-520-3744
    Fax: 1-613-520-3906

    Order Information:
    Email:

    Related research

    Keywords: Marx; Engels; Socialism; Transition; Equality; Hayek; Mises;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Howard, M C & King, J E, 2001. "Where Marx Was Right: Towards a More Secure Foundation for Heterodox Economies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(6), pages 785-807, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:car:carecp:02-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Renee Lortie).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.