IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bre/polcon/829.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Undercutting the future? European research spending in times of fiscal consolidation

Author

Listed:
  • Reinhilde Veugelers

Abstract

The crisis seems to have widened the gap between EU countries in public R&I expenditure. Even though the EU budget serves as mechanism to somewhat ease the growing public R&I divide in Europe - EU funds are relatively more significant for innovation-lagging countries with low national R&I budgets - it is crucial to assess whether the effectiveness of these R&I programmes. Understanding the degree to which public R&I budgets in...

Suggested Citation

  • Reinhilde Veugelers, 2014. "Undercutting the future? European research spending in times of fiscal consolidation," Policy Contributions 829, Bruegel.
  • Handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/publications/pc_2014_06_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montmartin, B. & Herrera, M. & Massard, N., 2015. "R&D policies in France: New evidence from a NUTS3 spatial analysis," Working Papers 2015-11, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    2. Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2017. "The intensity of business R&D in Italy: why reducing the gap with the EU is possible and worthwhile," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(2), pages 245-257, June.
    3. Reinhilde Veugelers, 2015. "Do We Have the Right Kind of Diversity in Innovation Policies Among EU Member Countries? WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 108," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58414, April.
    4. Bernhard Dachs, 2014. "R&D Internationalisation and the Global Financial Crisis," Chapters, in: Bernhard Dachs & Robert Stehrer & Georg Zahradnik (ed.), The Internationalisation of Business R&D, chapter 13, pages 1-3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Agnė Paliokaitė & Pijus Krūminas & Stamenov Blagoy, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Lithuania," JRC Research Reports JRC101199, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Kincsö Izsak & Slavo Radošević, 2017. "EU Research and Innovation Policies as Factors of Convergence or Divergence after the Crisis," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 274-283.
    7. Curatola, Giuliano & Donadelli, Michael & Gioffré, Alessandro & Grüning, Patrick, 2015. "Austerity, fiscal uncertainty, and economic growth: Insights from fiscally weak EU countries," SAFE Working Paper Series 56, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2015.
    8. Francesco Prota & Maria Jennifer Grisorio, 2018. "Public expenditure in time of crisis: are Italian policymakers choosing the right mix?," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 35(2), pages 337-365, August.
    9. Donadelli, Michael & Grüning, Patrick, 2021. "Innovation dynamics and fiscal policy: Implications for growth, asset prices, and welfare," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    10. Gundars Kulikovskis & Diana Petraityte & Stamenov Blagoy, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Latvia," JRC Research Reports JRC101203, Joint Research Centre.
    11. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:16-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Grimpe Christoph & Jessica Mitchell, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Denmark," JRC Research Reports JRC101183, Joint Research Centre.
    13. Pellens, Maikel & Peters, Bettina & Hud, Martin & Rammer, Christian & Licht, Georg, 2020. "Public R&D investment in economic crises," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-088, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Kelchtermans Stijn & Zacharewicz Thomas, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Belgium," JRC Research Reports JRC101167, Joint Research Centre.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruegel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bruegbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.