IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v44y2017i2p274-283..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU Research and Innovation Policies as Factors of Convergence or Divergence after the Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Kincsö Izsak
  • Slavo Radošević

Abstract

The 2008 global financial and economic crisis has disturbed the evolution of research and innovation (R&I) policies in Europe and it continues to have significant consequences. This article reviews the evolution of and changes in R&I policy funding and measures before and in the aftermath of the crisis, and analyses reactions in three groups: Southern, Central-Eastern, and Northwest European country groups. Based on the analysis of the Erawatch-TrendChart Inventory, we show that the crisis induced three different responses. In Northwest Europe, it induced further support for R&I activities; in Southern Europe it led to the collapse of national public support and its substitution only to some extent by EU Structural Funds; and in Central-Eastern Europe to an apparently much stronger compensation effect. Overall, these trends suggest that R&I policies have operated as a factor of further divergence between Northwest and South, and as potential factor of convergence between Northwest and Central-East.

Suggested Citation

  • Kincsö Izsak & Slavo Radošević, 2017. "EU Research and Innovation Policies as Factors of Convergence or Divergence after the Crisis," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 274-283.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:2:p:274-283.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scw063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reinhilde Veugelers, 2014. "Undercutting the future? European research spending in times of fiscal consolidation," Policy Contributions 829, Bruegel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akcomak, Semih & Erdil, Erkan & Cetinkaya, Umut Yılmaz, 2018. "Knowledge convergence in European regions: Towards cohesion?," MERIT Working Papers 2018-027, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Erkan Erdil & İbrahim Semih Akçomak & Umut Yılmaz Çetinkaya, 2022. "Is There Knowledge Convergence Among European Regions? Evidence from the European Union Framework Programmes," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1243-1267, June.
    3. Jugend, Daniel & Fiorini, Paula De Camargo & Armellini, Fabiano & Ferrari, Aline Gabriela, 2020. "Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Leonid Gokhberg & Dirk Meissner & Ilya Kuzminov, 2023. "What semantic analysis can tell us about long term trends in the global STI policy agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2249-2277, December.
    5. Francisco A. Blanco & Francisco J. Delgado & Maria J. Presno, 2018. "R&D Expenditure in the EU: Convergence or Divergence?," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 1804, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    6. Tamás Stadler & Ágoston Temesi & Zoltán Lakner, 2022. "Soil Chemical Pollution and Military Actions: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Daniele Archibugi & Andrea Filippetti & Marion Frenz, 2018. "Investment in innovation for European recovery: a public policy priority," Management Working Papers 16, Birkbeck Department of Management, revised Feb 2021.
    8. Björn Alecke & Timo Mitze & Annekatrin Niebuhr, 2021. "Building a bridge over the valley of death? New pathways for innovation policy in structurally weak regions," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 41(2), pages 185-210, October.
    9. Thomas Brenner & Annekatrin Niebuhr, 2021. "Policy options for lagging regions—effects, new approaches and emerging challenges: introduction to the special issue," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 41(2), pages 125-130, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Montmartin, B. & Herrera, M. & Massard, N., 2015. "R&D policies in France: New evidence from a NUTS3 spatial analysis," Working Papers 2015-11, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    2. Gundars Kulikovskis & Diana Petraityte & Stamenov Blagoy, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Latvia," JRC Research Reports JRC101203, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Donadelli, Michael & Grüning, Patrick, 2021. "Innovation dynamics and fiscal policy: Implications for growth, asset prices, and welfare," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Curatola, Giuliano & Donadelli, Michael & Gioffré, Alessandro & Grüning, Patrick, 2015. "Austerity, fiscal uncertainty, and economic growth: Insights from fiscally weak EU countries," SAFE Working Paper Series 56, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2015.
    5. Bernhard Dachs, 2014. "R&D Internationalisation and the Global Financial Crisis," Chapters, in: Bernhard Dachs & Robert Stehrer & Georg Zahradnik (ed.), The Internationalisation of Business R&D, chapter 13, pages 1-3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Agnė Paliokaitė & Pijus Krūminas & Stamenov Blagoy, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Lithuania," JRC Research Reports JRC101199, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Alessandro Sterlacchini, 2017. "The intensity of business R&D in Italy: why reducing the gap with the EU is possible and worthwhile," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(2), pages 245-257, June.
    8. Pellens, Maikel & Peters, Bettina & Hud, Martin & Rammer, Christian & Licht, Georg, 2020. "Public R&D investment in economic crises," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-088, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Reinhilde Veugelers, 2015. "Do We Have the Right Kind of Diversity in Innovation Policies Among EU Member Countries? WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 108," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58414, February.
    10. Grimpe Christoph & Jessica Mitchell, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Denmark," JRC Research Reports JRC101183, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Kelchtermans Stijn & Zacharewicz Thomas, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Belgium," JRC Research Reports JRC101167, Joint Research Centre.
    12. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:16-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Francesco Prota & Maria Jennifer Grisorio, 2018. "Public expenditure in time of crisis: are Italian policymakers choosing the right mix?," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 35(2), pages 337-365, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:2:p:274-283.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.