IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2017_397.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does the risk match the returns: an examination of US commercial property market data

Author

Listed:
  • David Higgins

Abstract

Evidence from the US Commercial property market suggests periods of extended stable performance are generally followed by large concentrated price fluctuations. This extreme volatility may not be fully reflected in traditional risk (standard deviation) calculations. This research studies 38 years of NCREIF commercial property market performance data for normal distribution features and signs of extreme downside risk. Methodology covers the recognised Z Test and the fractal geometry, Cubic Power Law instrument. For the reporting of annual returns on quarterly figures, the industry preferred investment performance measure, the results showed the data to be both asymmetric, and being taller and narrower than a normal bell curve distribution with fat dumb bell downside tails at the perimeter. In highlighting the challenges to measuring commercial property market performance, the research revealed a better analysis of extreme downside risk is by a Cubic Power Law distribution model, being a robust method to identify the performance of an investment to the vulnerabilities of serve risk. Modelling techniques for estimating measures of tail risk provide challenges and have shown to be beyond current risk management practices, being too narrow and constraining approach.

Suggested Citation

  • David Higgins, 2017. "Does the risk match the returns: an examination of US commercial property market data," ERES eres2017_397, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2017_397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2017-397
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/397.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Callender & Steven Devaney & Angela Sheahan & Tony Key, 2007. "Risk Reduction and Diversification in UK Commercial Property Portfolios," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 355-375, December.
    2. Neil Crosby & Patrick McAllister, 2004. "Liquidity In Commercial Property Markets: Deconstructing The Transaction Process," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2004-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy, 2018. "Ex-ante real estate Value at Risk calculation method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(2), pages 257-285, March.
    2. John Henneberry & Fotis Mouzakis, 2014. "Familiarity and the Determination of Yields for Regional Office Property Investments in the UK," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 530-546, March.
    3. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    4. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Michel Baroni & Fabrice Barthélémy & Mahdi Mokrane, 2015. "The impact of lease structures on the optimal holding period for a commercial real estate portfolio," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(2), pages 121-139, March.
    5. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Michel Baroni & Fabrice Barthélémy & Mahdi Mokrane, 2015. "The impact of lease structures on the optimal holding period for a commercial real estate portfolio," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 33(2), pages 121-139, March.
    6. Gert Abraham Lowies & Christiaan Ernst Cloete, 2013. "The Influence of Frame Dependence on Investment Decisions made by Listed Property Fund Managers in South Africa," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(11), pages 805-814.
    7. Brett Robinson, 2012. "How many leases are enough to diversify a portfolio of multi-let industrial properties?," ERES eres2012_351, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    8. Andrew Baum & Nick Colley, 2017. "Can Real Estate Investors Avoid Specific Risk?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(3), pages 395-430, September.
    9. Gianluca Marcato, 2018. "Liquidity Pricing of Illiquid Assets," ERES eres2018_215, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    10. Maarten Spek, 2017. "Investing in Real Estate Debt: Is it Real Estate or Fixed Income?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(3), pages 349-370, September.
    11. Steven Devaney & Roberto Martinez Diaz, 2011. "Transaction based indices for the UK commercial real estate market: an exploration using IPD transaction data," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 269-289, June.
    12. Shaun Bond & Soosung Hwang & Zhenguo Lin & Kerry Vandell, 2007. "Marketing Period Risk in a Portfolio Context: Theory and Empirical Estimates from the UK Commercial Real Estate Market," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 447-461, May.
    13. Kevin C.H. Chiang & Xiaguan Jiang & Ming‐Long Lee, 2010. "REIT idiosyncratic risk," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 349-366, February.
    14. Elias Oikarinen & Martin Hoesli & Camilo Serrano, 2013. "Do Public Real Estate Returns Really Lead Private Returns?," ERES eres2013_145, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    15. Tim A. Kroencke & Felix Schindler & Bertram I. Steininger, 2018. "The Anatomy of Public and Private Real Estate Return Premia," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 500-523, April.
    16. Lee, Chyi Lin & Stevenson, Simon & Cho, Hyunbum, 2022. "Listed real estate futures trading, market efficiency, and direct real estate linkages: International evidence," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Commercial property market performance%2C; Extreme risk; Power Law distribution; Standard deviation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2017_397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.