IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2402.17523.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Navigating Complexity: Constrained Portfolio Analysis in High Dimensions with Tracking Error and Weight Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Caner
  • Qingliang Fan
  • Yingying Li

Abstract

This paper analyzes the statistical properties of constrained portfolio formation in a high dimensional portfolio with a large number of assets. Namely, we consider portfolios with tracking error constraints, portfolios with tracking error jointly with weight (equality or inequality) restrictions, and portfolios with only weight restrictions. Tracking error is the portfolio's performance measured against a benchmark (an index usually), {\color{black}{and weight constraints refers to specific allocation of assets within the portfolio, which often come in the form of regulatory requirement or fund prospectus.}} We show how these portfolios can be estimated consistently in large dimensions, even when the number of assets is larger than the time span of the portfolio. We also provide rate of convergence results for weights of the constrained portfolio, risk of the constrained portfolio and the Sharpe Ratio of the constrained portfolio. To achieve those results we use a new machine learning technique that merges factor models with nodewise regression in statistics. Simulation results and empirics show very good performance of our method.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Caner & Qingliang Fan & Yingying Li, 2024. "Navigating Complexity: Constrained Portfolio Analysis in High Dimensions with Tracking Error and Weight Constraints," Papers 2402.17523, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2402.17523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.17523
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Gagliardini & Elisa Ossola & Olivier Scaillet, 2016. "Time‐Varying Risk Premium in Large Cross‐Sectional Equity Data Sets," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 985-1046, May.
    2. Jianqing Fan & Yuan Liao & Martina Mincheva, 2013. "Large covariance estimation by thresholding principal orthogonal complements," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(4), pages 603-680, September.
    3. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2017. "Nonlinear Shrinkage of the Covariance Matrix for Portfolio Selection: Markowitz Meets Goldilocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(12), pages 4349-4388.
    4. Caner, Mehmet & Kock, Anders Bredahl, 2018. "Asymptotically honest confidence regions for high dimensional parameters by the desparsified conservative Lasso," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 143-168.
    5. Ledoit, Oliver & Wolf, Michael, 2008. "Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 850-859, December.
    6. Ravi Jagannathan & Tongshu Ma, 2003. "Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1651-1683, August.
    7. Laurent Callot & Mehmet Caner & A. Özlem Önder & Esra Ulaşan, 2021. "A Nodewise Regression Approach to Estimating Large Portfolios," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 520-531, March.
    8. Isabelle Bajeux‐Besnainou & Riadh Belhaj & Didier Maillard & Roland Portait, 2011. "Portfolio Optimization Under Tracking Error And Weights Constraints," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 34(2), pages 295-330, June.
    9. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Francisco J. Nogales & Raman Uppal, 2009. "A Generalized Approach to Portfolio Optimization: Improving Performance by Constraining Portfolio Norms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 798-812, May.
    10. Chang, Jinyuan & Qiu, Yumou & Yao, Qiwei & Zou, Tao, 2018. "Confidence regions for entries of a large precision matrix," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 57-82.
    11. Ravi Jagannathan & Tongshu Ma, 2003. "Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1651-1684, August.
    12. Mengmeng Ao & Li Yingying & Xinghua Zheng, 2019. "Approaching Mean-Variance Efficiency for Large Portfolios," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(7), pages 2890-2919.
    13. Chang, Jinyuan & Qiu, Yumou & Yao, Qiwei & Zou, Tao, 2018. "Confidence regions for entries of a large precision matrix," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 87513, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Jobson, J D & Korkie, Bob M, 1981. "Performance Hypothesis Testing with the Sharpe and Treynor Measures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 36(4), pages 889-908, September.
    15. Almazan, Andres & Brown, Keith C. & Carlson, Murray & Chapman, David A., 2004. "Why constrain your mutual fund manager?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 289-321, August.
    16. Jin-Hong Du & Yifeng Guo & Xueqin Wang, 2023. "High-Dimensional Portfolio Selection with Cardinality Constraints," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(542), pages 779-791, April.
    17. Caner, Mehmet & Medeiros, Marcelo & Vasconcelos, Gabriel F.R., 2023. "Sharpe Ratio analysis in high dimensions: Residual-based nodewise regression in factor models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 393-417.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caner, Mehmet & Medeiros, Marcelo & Vasconcelos, Gabriel F.R., 2023. "Sharpe Ratio analysis in high dimensions: Residual-based nodewise regression in factor models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 393-417.
    2. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2022. "Sparsity and stability for minimum-variance portfolios," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 214-235, September.
    3. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2019. "Sparsity and Stability for Minimum-Variance Portfolios," Papers 1910.11840, arXiv.org.
    4. Hiraki, Kazuhiro & Sun, Chuanping, 2022. "A toolkit for exploiting contemporaneous stock correlations," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 99-124.
    5. Gianluca De Nard & Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2018. "Factor models for portfolio selection in large dimensions: the good, the better and the ugly," ECON - Working Papers 290, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Dec 2018.
    6. Thomas Conlon & John Cotter & Iason Kynigakis, 2021. "Machine Learning and Factor-Based Portfolio Optimization," Papers 2107.13866, arXiv.org.
    7. Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Yegor Klochkov & Alla Petukhina & Nikita Zhivotovskiy, 2022. "Robustifying Markowitz," Papers 2212.13996, arXiv.org.
    8. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2021. "Cross-validated covariance estimators for high-dimensional minimum-variance portfolios," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 35(3), pages 309-352, September.
    9. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    10. Seyoung Park & Eun Ryung Lee & Sungchul Lee & Geonwoo Kim, 2019. "Dantzig Type Optimization Method with Applications to Portfolio Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, June.
    11. Jacobs, Heiko & Müller, Sebastian & Weber, Martin, 2014. "How should individual investors diversify? An empirical evaluation of alternative asset allocation policies," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 62-85.
    12. Michael Curran & Patrick O'Sullivan & Ryan Zalla, 2020. "Can Volatility Solve the Naive Portfolio Puzzle?," Papers 2005.03204, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    13. Lassance, Nathan & Vrins, Frédéric, 2023. "Portfolio selection: A target-distribution approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 302-314.
    14. Gianni Filograsso & Giacomo Tollo, 2023. "Adaptive evolutionary algorithms for portfolio selection problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-38, December.
    15. De Nard, Gianluca & Zhao, Zhao, 2022. "A large-dimensional test for cross-sectional anomalies:Efficient sorting revisited," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 654-676.
    16. Ekaterina Seregina, 2020. "A Basket Half Full: Sparse Portfolios," Papers 2011.04278, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    17. De Nard, Gianluca & Zhao, Zhao, 2023. "Using, taming or avoiding the factor zoo? A double-shrinkage estimator for covariance matrices," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 23-35.
    18. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2020. "Company classification using machine learning," Papers 2004.01496, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    19. Zhentao Shi & Liangjun Su & Tian Xie, 2020. "L2-Relaxation: With Applications to Forecast Combination and Portfolio Analysis," Papers 2010.09477, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    20. Donggyu Kim & Minseog Oh, 2023. "Dynamic Realized Minimum Variance Portfolio Models," Papers 2310.13511, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2402.17523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.