IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2302.08302.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stochastic control problems with state-reflections arising from relaxed benchmark tracking

Author

Listed:
  • Lijun Bo
  • Yijie Huang
  • Xiang Yu

Abstract

This paper studies stochastic control problems motivated by optimal consumption with wealth benchmark tracking. The benchmark process is modeled by a combination of a geometric Brownian motion and a running maximum process, indicating its increasing trend in the long run. We consider a relaxed tracking formulation such that the wealth compensated by the injected capital always dominates the benchmark process. The stochastic control problem is to maximize the expected utility of consumption deducted by the cost of the capital injection under the dynamic floor constraint. By introducing two auxiliary state processes with reflections, an equivalent auxiliary control problem is formulated and studied, which leads to the HJB equation with two Neumann boundary conditions. We establish the existence of a unique classical solution to the dual PDE using some novel probabilistic representations involving the local time of some dual processes together with a tailor-made decomposition-homogenization technique. The proof of the verification theorem on the optimal feedback control can be carried out by some stochastic flow analysis and technical estimations of the optimal control.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijun Bo & Yijie Huang & Xiang Yu, 2023. "Stochastic control problems with state-reflections arising from relaxed benchmark tracking," Papers 2302.08302, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2302.08302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.08302
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marina Di Giacinto & Salvatore Federico & Fausto Gozzi, 2011. "Pension funds with a minimum guarantee: a stochastic control approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 297-342, June.
    2. Merton, Robert C., 1971. "Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 373-413, December.
    3. Gaivoronski, Alexei A. & Krylov, Sergiy & van der Wijst, Nico, 2005. "Optimal portfolio selection and dynamic benchmark tracking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(1), pages 115-131, May.
    4. Strub, O. & Baumann, P., 2018. "Optimal construction and rebalancing of index-tracking portfolios," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 370-387.
    5. El Karoui, Nicole & Jeanblanc, Monique & Lacoste, Vincent, 2005. "Optimal portfolio management with American capital guarantee," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 449-468, March.
    6. Di Giacinto, Marina & Federico, Salvatore & Gozzi, Fausto & Vigna, Elena, 2014. "Income drawdown option with minimum guarantee," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 610-624.
    7. Weerasinghe, Ananda & Zhu, Chao, 2016. "Optimal inventory control with path-dependent cost criteria," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(6), pages 1585-1621.
    8. Lijun Bo & Huafu Liao & Xiang Yu, 2020. "Optimal Tracking Portfolio with A Ratcheting Capital Benchmark," Papers 2006.13661, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    9. Nicole El Karoui & Asma Meziou, 2006. "Constrained Optimization With Respect To Stochastic Dominance: Application To Portfolio Insurance," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 103-117, January.
    10. Yuk-Loong Chow & Xiang Yu & Chao Zhou, 2020. "On Dynamic Programming Principle for Stochastic Control Under Expectation Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 803-818, June.
    11. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lijun Bo & Yijie Huang & Xiang Yu, 2023. "An extended Merton problem with relaxed benchmark tracking," Papers 2304.10802, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lijun Bo & Yijie Huang & Xiang Yu, 2023. "An extended Merton problem with relaxed benchmark tracking," Papers 2304.10802, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    2. Lijun Bo & Huafu Liao & Xiang Yu, 2020. "Optimal Tracking Portfolio with A Ratcheting Capital Benchmark," Papers 2006.13661, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    3. Di Giacinto, Marina & Federico, Salvatore & Gozzi, Fausto & Vigna, Elena, 2014. "Income drawdown option with minimum guarantee," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 610-624.
    4. Gerrard, Russell & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vodička, Peter, 2023. "On optimal constrained investment strategies for long-term savers in stochastic environments and probability hedging," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 948-962.
    5. Xianzhe Chen & Weidong Tian, 2014. "Optimal portfolio choice and consistent performance," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 37(2), pages 453-474, October.
    6. Marina Di Giacinto & Salvatore Federico & Fausto Gozzi, 2011. "Pension funds with a minimum guarantee: a stochastic control approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 297-342, June.
    7. Pablo Castañeda & Heinz Rudolph, 2010. "Portfolio Choice, Minimum Return Guarantees, and Competition in DC Pension Systems," Working Papers 39, Superintendencia de Pensiones, revised Feb 2010.
    8. Thai Nguyen & Mitja Stadje, 2018. "Optimal investment for participating insurance contracts under VaR-Regulation," Papers 1805.09068, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    9. Cousin, Areski & Jiao, Ying & Robert, Christian Y. & Zerbib, Olivier David, 2016. "Asset allocation strategies in the presence of liability constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 327-338.
    10. Jun Sekine, 2012. "Long-term optimal portfolios with floor," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 369-401, July.
    11. Chen, An & Hieber, Peter & Nguyen, Thai, 2019. "Constrained non-concave utility maximization: An application to life insurance contracts with guarantees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1119-1135.
    12. Pézier, Jacques & Scheller, Johanna, 2013. "Best portfolio insurance for long-term investment strategies in realistic conditions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 263-274.
    13. Morten Tolver Kronborg, 2014. "Optimal Consumption and Investment with Labor Income and European/American Capital Guarantee," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Auffret, Philippe, 2001. "An alternative unifying measure of welfare gains from risk-sharing," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2676, The World Bank.
    15. Chen, An & Hieber, Peter & Sureth, Caren, 2022. "Pay for tax certainty? Advance tax rulings for risky investment under multi-dimensional tax uncertainty," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 273, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    16. Andreas Fagereng & Luigi Guiso & Davide Malacrino & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 115-170, January.
    17. Yuki SHIGETA, 2022. "A Continuous-Time Utility Maximization Problem with Borrowing Constraints in Macroeconomic Heterogeneous Agent Models:A Case of Regular Controls under Markov Chain Uncertainty," Discussion papers e-22-009, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    18. John H. Cochrane, 1999. "New facts in finance," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 23(Q III), pages 36-58.
    19. John Y. Campbell & Luis M. Viceira & Joshua S. White, 2003. "Foreign Currency for Long-Term Investors," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(486), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Stephen Satchell & Susan Thorp, 2007. "Scenario Analysis with Recursive Utility: Dynamic Consumption Plans for Charitable Endowments," Research Paper Series 209, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2302.08302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.