IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2207.02947.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal investment strategy to maximize the expected utility of an insurance company under Cramer Lundberg dynamic

Author

Listed:
  • J. Cerda-Hernandez
  • A. Sikov

Abstract

In this work, we examine the combined problem of optimal portfolio selection rules for an insurer in a continuous time model where the surplus of an insurance company is modelled as a compound Poisson process. The company can invest its surplus in a risk free asset and in a risky asset, governed by the Black-Scholes equation. According to utility theory, in a financial market where investors are facing uncertainty, an investor is not concerned with wealth maximization per se but with utility maximization. It is therefore possible to introduce an increasing and concave utility function $\phi(x,t)$ representing the expected utility of a risk averse investor (insurance company). Therefore, the goal of this work is not anymore to maximize the expected portfolio value or minimize the ruin probability or maximizing the expectation of the present value of all dividends paid to the shareholders up to the ruin, but to maximize the expected utility stemming from the wealth during the life contract [0,T]. In this direction, using the Dynamic Programming Principle of the problem, we obtain the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation by our optimization problem (HJB). Finally, we present numerical solutions in some cases, obtaining as optimal strategy the well known Merton's strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Cerda-Hernandez & A. Sikov, 2022. "Optimal investment strategy to maximize the expected utility of an insurance company under Cramer Lundberg dynamic," Papers 2207.02947, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2207.02947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.02947
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Browne, S., 1995. "Optimal Investment Policies for a Firm with a Random Risk Process: Exponential Utility and Minimizing the Probability of Ruin," Papers 95-08, Columbia - Graduate School of Business.
    2. Merton, Robert C., 1971. "Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 373-413, December.
    3. Landsman, Zinoviy & Sherris, Michael, 2001. "Risk measures and insurance premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 103-115, August.
    4. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    5. Wang, Shaun & Dhaene, Jan, 1998. "Comonotonicity, correlation order and premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 235-242, July.
    6. Sid Browne, 1995. "Optimal Investment Policies for a Firm With a Random Risk Process: Exponential Utility and Minimizing the Probability of Ruin," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 937-958, November.
    7. Diko, Peter & Usábel, Miguel, 2011. "A numerical method for the expected penalty-reward function in a Markov-modulated jump-diffusion process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 126-131, July.
    8. Hipp, Christian & Plum, Michael, 2000. "Optimal investment for insurers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 215-228, October.
    9. Merton H. Miller & Franco Modigliani, 1961. "Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34, pages 411-411.
    10. Hipp, Christian & Vogt, Michael, 2003. "Optimal Dynamic XL Reinsurance," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 193-207, November.
    11. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R. & Panjer, Harry H., 1997. "Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 173-183, November.
    12. Embrechts, P. & Veraverbeke, N., 1982. "Estimates for the probability of ruin with special emphasis on the possibility of large claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 55-72, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilel Jarraya & Abdelfettah Bouri, 2013. "A Theoretical Assessment on Optimal Asset Allocations in Insurance Industry," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 2(4), pages 30-44, October.
    2. Christensen, Bent Jesper & Parra-Alvarez, Juan Carlos & Serrano, Rafael, 2021. "Optimal control of investment, premium and deductible for a non-life insurance company," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 384-405.
    3. Li, Zhongfei & Yao, Jing & Li, Duan, 2010. "Behavior patterns of investment strategies under Roy's safety-first principle," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 167-179, May.
    4. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 2005. "On optimal investment and subexponential claims," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 25-35, February.
    5. Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2021. "Merton Investment Problems in Finance and Insurance for the Hawkes-based Models," Papers 2104.02694, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    6. Zhu, Huiming & Deng, Chao & Yue, Shengjie & Deng, Yingchun, 2015. "Optimal reinsurance and investment problem for an insurer with counterparty risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 242-254.
    7. Thonhauser, Stefan & Albrecher, Hansjorg, 2007. "Dividend maximization under consideration of the time value of ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 163-184, July.
    8. Zhao, Qian & Wang, Rongming & Wei, Jiaqin, 2016. "Exponential utility maximization for an insurer with time-inconsistent preferences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 89-104.
    9. Guan, Guohui & Liang, Zongxia, 2014. "Optimal reinsurance and investment strategies for insurer under interest rate and inflation risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 105-115.
    10. Sanjiv R. Das & Daniel Ostrov & Aviva Casanova & Anand Radhakrishnan & Deep Srivastav, 2021. "Combining Investment and Tax Strategies for Optimizing Lifetime Solvency under Uncertain Returns and Mortality," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Jin, Zhuo & Yang, Hailiang & Yin, G., 2021. "A hybrid deep learning method for optimal insurance strategies: Algorithms and convergence analysis," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 262-275.
    12. He, Yong & Zhou, Xia & Chen, Peimin & Wang, Xiaoyang, 2022. "An analytical solution for the robust investment-reinsurance strategy with general utilities," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    13. Irgens, Christian & Paulsen, Jostein, 2004. "Optimal control of risk exposure, reinsurance and investments for insurance portfolios," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 21-51, August.
    14. Yan Tong & Tongling Lv & Yu Yan, 2023. "Optimal Investment and Reinsurance Policies in a Continuous-Time Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Arash Fahim & Lingjiong Zhu, 2023. "Optimal Investment in a Dual Risk Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, February.
    16. Zhuo Jin & Zuo Quan Xu & Bin Zou, 2020. "A Perturbation Approach to Optimal Investment, Liability Ratio, and Dividend Strategies," Papers 2012.06703, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    17. Xue, Xiaole & Wei, Pengyu & Weng, Chengguo, 2019. "Derivatives trading for insurers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 40-53.
    18. Sanjiv R. Das & Daniel Ostrov & Anand Radhakrishnan & Deep Srivastav, 2020. "Dynamic portfolio allocation in goals-based wealth management," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 613-640, December.
    19. Mohamed Badaoui & Begoña Fernández & Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2018. "An Optimal Investment Strategy for Insurers in Incomplete Markets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Gaier, Johanna & Grandits, Peter, 2002. "Ruin probabilities in the presence of regularly varying tails and optimal investment," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 211-217, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2207.02947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.