IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2109.12568.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Design and validation of an index to measure development in rural areas through stakeholder participation

Author

Listed:
  • Abreu I.
  • Mesias F. J.
  • Ramajo
  • J

Abstract

This paper proposes the development of an index to assess rural development based on a set of 25 demographic, economic, environmental, and social welfare indicators previously selected through a Delphi approach. Three widely accepted aggregation methods were then tested: a mixed arithmetic/geometric mean without weightings for each indicator; a weighted arithmetic mean using the weights previously generated by the Delphi panel and an aggregation through Principal Component Analysis. These three methodologies were later applied to 9 Portuguese NUTS III regions, and the results were presented to a group of experts in rural development who indicated which of the three forms of aggregation best measured the levels of rural development of the different territories. Finally, it was concluded that the unweighted arithmetic/geometric mean was the most accurate methodology for aggregating indicators to create a Rural Development Index.

Suggested Citation

  • Abreu I. & Mesias F. J. & Ramajo & J, 2021. "Design and validation of an index to measure development in rural areas through stakeholder participation," Papers 2109.12568, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2109.12568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.12568
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jerzy Michalek & Nana Zarnekow, 2012. "Construction and application of the Rural Development Index to analysis of rural regions," JRC Research Reports JRC72059, Joint Research Centre.
    2. repec:ipt:wpaper:jrc72059 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Davis, Gloria, 2004. "A history of the social development network in The World Bank, 1973 - 2003," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 31618, The World Bank.
    4. Jerzy Michalek & Nana Zarnekow, 2012. "Application of the Rural Development Index to Analysis of Rural Regions in Poland and Slovakia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 1-37, January.
    5. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    6. Horrillo, A. & Escribano, M. & Mesias, F.J. & Elghannam, A. & Gaspar, P., 2016. "Is there a future for organic production in high ecological value ecosystems?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 114-125.
    7. I. Abreu & J. M. Nunes & F. J. Mesias, 2019. "Can Rural Development Be Measured? Design and Application of a Synthetic Index to Portuguese Municipalities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 1107-1123, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Whelan, Adele & McGuinness, Seamus & Barrett, Alan, 2021. "Review of International Approaches to Evaluating Rural and Community Development Investment and Supports," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS124, June.
    2. Hennebry Barraí & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Classification of Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Application of a Rural Development Index for Austria and Portugal," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 5-14, June.
    3. Bianca Mitrică & Paul Şerban & Irena Mocanu & Ines Grigorescu & Nicoleta Damian & Monica Dumitraşcu, 2020. "Social Development and Regional Disparities in the Rural Areas of Romania: Focus on the Social Disadvantaged Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 67-89, November.
    4. Ilinca-Valentina Stoica & Antoni F. Tulla & Daniela Zamfir & Alexandru-Ionuț Petrișor, 2020. "Exploring the Urban Strength of Small Towns in Romania," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 843-875, December.
    5. I. Abreu & J. M. Nunes & F. J. Mesias, 2019. "Can Rural Development Be Measured? Design and Application of a Synthetic Index to Portuguese Municipalities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 1107-1123, October.
    6. Jianwu Qi & Wei Li & Zongxiang Wang & Haozhou Fang, 2021. "Measurement and Path Selection of Rural Development Level in Enclave Areas: A Case Study of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Joseph G. Walters & Stuart Marsh & Lucelia Rodrigues, 2022. "Planning Perspectives on Rural Connected, Autonomous and Electric Vehicle Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Fertő, Imre & Bakucs, Zoltán & Varga, Ágnes, 2016. "Impact of EU subsidies on the of rural areas in Hungary," 160th Seminar, December 1-2, 2016, Warsaw, Poland 249826, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Bianca Mitrică & Irena Mocanu & Monica Dumitraşcu & Ines Grigorescu, 2017. "Socio-Economic Disparities in the Development of the Romania’s Border Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 899-916, December.
    10. Peng Bin, 2016. "Dynamic Development of Regional Disparity in Mainland China: An Experimental Study Based on a Multidimensional Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-28, December.
    11. Dessy Rachmawatie & Ernan Rustiadi & Akhmad Fauzi & Bambang Juanda, 2021. "Driving Factors of Community Empowerment and Development through Renewable Energy for Electricity in Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 326-332.
    12. Kurek, Katarzyna A. & Heijman, Wim & van Ophem, Johan & Gędek, Stanisław & Strojny, Jacek, 2020. "The impact of geothermal resources on the competitiveness of municipalities: evidence from Poland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1230-1239.
    13. Marco Marozzi, 2015. "Measuring Trust in European Public Institutions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 879-895, September.
    14. Nadiia Davydenko & Natalia Wasilewska & Svitlana Boiko & Mirosław Wasilewski, 2022. "Development of Rural Areas in Ukraine in the Context of Decentralization: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Zoltán Bakucs & Imre Fertő & Zsófia Benedek, 2019. "Success or Waste of Taxpayer Money? Impact Assessment of Rural Development Programs in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Jakub Straka & Marcela Tuzová, 2016. "Factors Affecting Development of Rural Areas in the Czech Republic: a Literature Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(6), pages 2141-2150.
    17. Bakucs, Zoltan, 2018. "Convergence or Divergence? Analysis of Regional Development Convergence in Hungary," 92nd Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2018, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 273487, Agricultural Economics Society.
    18. Bianca Mitrică & Paul-Răzvan Şerban & Irena Mocanu & Nicoleta Damian & Ines Grigorescu & Monica Dumitraşcu & Cristina Dumitrică, 2021. "Developing an Indicator-Based Framework to Measure Sustainable Tourism in Romania. A Territorial Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Žana Jurjević & Stanislav Zekić & Danilo Đokić & Bojan Matkovski, 2021. "Regional Spatial Approach to Differences in Rural Economic Development: Insights from Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Costică Mihai & Simona-Roxana Ulman & Mihaela David, 2019. "New Assessment of Development Status among the People Living in Rural Areas: an Alternative Approach for Rural Vitality," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 66(2), pages 167-192, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2109.12568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.