IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2109.06995.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Strategic Inventories in a Supply Chain with Downstream Cournot Duopoly

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaowei Hu
  • Jaejin Jang
  • Nabeel Hamoud
  • Amirsaman Bajgiran

Abstract

The inventories carried in a supply chain as a strategic tool to influence the competing firms are considered to be strategic inventories (SI). We present a two-period game-theoretic supply chain model, in which a singular manufacturer supplies products to a pair of identical Cournot duopolistic retailers. We show that the SI carried by the retailers under dynamic contract is Pareto-dominating for the manufacturer, retailers, consumers, the channel, and the society as well. We also find that the retailer's SI, however, can be eliminated when the manufacturer commits wholesale contract or inventory holding cost is too high. In comparing the cases with and without downstream competition, we also show that the downstream Cournot duopoly undermines the retailers in profits, but benefits all others.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaowei Hu & Jaejin Jang & Nabeel Hamoud & Amirsaman Bajgiran, 2021. "Strategic Inventories in a Supply Chain with Downstream Cournot Duopoly," Papers 2109.06995, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2109.06995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.06995
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sébastien Mitraille & Michel Moreaux, 2013. "Inventories and Endogenous Stackelberg Leadership in Two‐Period Cournot Oligopoly," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 852-874, December.
    2. Anil Arya & Hans Frimor & Brian Mittendorf, 2015. "Decentralized Procurement in Light of Strategic Inventories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-585, March.
    3. Fabio Antoniou & Raffaele Fiocco, 2019. "Strategic inventories under limited commitment," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 695-729, September.
    4. C. Krishnamoorthi & V. Choudri, 2018. "An inventory model for deteriorating items with constant, linear and quadratic holding cost - a comparative study in third order equation," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(2), pages 262-280.
    5. Robin Hartwig & Karl Inderfurth & Abdolkarim Sadrieh & Guido Voigt, 2015. "Strategic Inventory and Supply Chain Behavior," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1329-1345, August.
    6. Mantin, Benny & Jiang, Lifei, 2017. "Strategic inventories with quality deterioration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 155-164.
    7. Meirani Harsasi & Minrohayati, 2017. "The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 240-247.
    8. Shibaji Panda, 2016. "Coordination and profit sharing in a supply chain through compensation on disposal cost," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(3), pages 351-370.
    9. Joseph J. Spengler, 1950. "Vertical Integration and Antitrust Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(4), pages 347-347.
    10. G.S. Mahapatra & Sudip Adak & T.K. Mandal & Shilpi Pal, 2017. "Inventory model for deteriorating items with time and reliability dependent demand and partial backorder," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(3), pages 344-359.
    11. Arvan, Lanny & Moses, Leon N, 1982. "Inventory Investment and the Theory of the Firm," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 186-193, March.
    12. Julio J. Rotemberg & Garth Saloner, 1989. "The Cyclical Behavior of Strategic Inventories," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 104(1), pages 73-97.
    13. Saloner, Garth, 1986. "The role of obsolescence and inventory costs in providing commitment," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 333-345, September.
    14. Krishnan Anand & Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok, 2008. "Strategic Inventories in Vertical Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1792-1804, October.
    15. Larry Arvan, 1985. "Some Examples of Dynamic Cournot Duopoly with Inventory," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 16(4), pages 569-578, Winter.
    16. A. P. Lerner, 1934. "The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 157-175.
    17. Oshmita Dey & Bibhas C. Giri & Debjani Chakraborty, 2016. "A fuzzy random continuous review inventory model with a mixture of backorders and lost sales under imprecise chance constraint," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(1), pages 34-51.
    18. Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2013. "Managing Strategic Inventories via Manufacturer-to-Consumer Rebates," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 813-818, April.
    19. Li, Suhong & Ragu-Nathan, Bhanu & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. & Subba Rao, S., 2006. "The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 107-124, April.
    20. Rajen Tibrewala & Ravi Tibrewala & P.L. Meena, 2018. "Buy-back policy for supply chain coordination: a simple rule," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(4), pages 545-572.
    21. Amihud, Yakov & Medenelson, Haim, 1989. "Inventory behaviour and market power: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 269-280, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Antoniou & Raffaele Fiocco, 2019. "Strategic inventories under limited commitment," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 695-729, September.
    2. Lang Xiong & Tingting Xiao & Fuhai Nie, 2022. "Group Buying of Competing Retailers with Strategic Inventory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Toshiki Matsuoka, 2023. "Input price discrimination and strategic inventory," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 91(2), pages 118-138, March.
    4. Lenhard, Severin, 2022. "Imperfect competition with costly disposal," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Huiqi Guan & Haresh Gurnani & Xin Geng & Yadong Luo, 2019. "Strategic Inventory and Supplier Encroachment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 536-555, July.
    6. Li, Jin & Yi, Liao & Shi, Victor & Chen, Xiding, 2021. "Supplier encroachment strategy in the presence of retail strategic inventory: Centralization or decentralization?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Severin Lenhard, 2021. "Imperfect Competition with Costly Disposal," Diskussionsschriften dp2105, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    8. Liu, Xuxu & Zhao, Da & Ji, Qingkai & Zeng, Yinlian & Hu, Xiangpei, 2023. "Managing strategic inventory under retailer competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(3), pages 1206-1219.
    9. QU, Zhan & RAFF, Horst, 2023. "Two-part tariffs, inventory stockpiling, and the bullwhip effect," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 201-214.
    10. Mantin, Benny & Veldman, Jasper, 2019. "Managing strategic inventories under investment in process improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 782-794.
    11. Miao, Jie & Liu, Aijun & Wang, Ruiyao & Lu, Hui, 2022. "The influence of information asymmetry on the strategic inventory of deteriorating commodity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Wang, Ningning & Xing, Wei & Zhao, Xuan, 2022. "Strategic inventory in the presence of socially responsible dual distribution channels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Li, Dan & Chen, Jing & Liao, Yi, 2021. "Optimal decisions on prices, order quantities, and returns policies in a supply chain with two-period selling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1063-1082.
    14. Abhishek Roy & Stephen M. Gilbert & Guoming Lai, 2019. "The Implications of Visibility on the Use of Strategic Inventory in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1752-1767, April.
    15. Chen, Pengyu & Liu, Xu & Wang, Qin & Zhou, Pin, 2022. "The Implications of Competition on Strategic Inventories Considering Manufacturer-to-Consumer Rebates," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    16. Lenhard, Severin, 2022. "Imperfect Competition with Costly Disposal," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264038, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Chen, Pengyu & Liu, Xu & Zhou, Pin & Zhu, Stuart X., 2022. "The interplay between strategic inventories and cost misreporting in supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Anil Arya & Hans Frimor & Brian Mittendorf, 2015. "Decentralized Procurement in Light of Strategic Inventories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-585, March.
    19. Krishnan Anand & Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok, 2008. "Strategic Inventories in Vertical Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1792-1804, October.
    20. Sébastien Mitraille & Michel Moreaux, 2013. "Inventories and Endogenous Stackelberg Leadership in Two‐Period Cournot Oligopoly," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 852-874, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2109.06995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.