IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2108.00664.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Learning who is in the market from time series: market participant discovery through adversarial calibration of multi-agent simulators

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Storchan
  • Svitlana Vyetrenko
  • Tucker Balch

Abstract

In electronic trading markets often only the price or volume time series, that result from interaction of multiple market participants, are directly observable. In order to test trading strategies before deploying them to real-time trading, multi-agent market environments calibrated so that the time series that result from interaction of simulated agents resemble historical are often used. To ensure adequate testing, one must test trading strategies in a variety of market scenarios -- which includes both scenarios that represent ordinary market days as well as stressed markets (most recently observed due to the beginning of COVID pandemic). In this paper, we address the problem of multi-agent simulator parameter calibration to allow simulator capture characteristics of different market regimes. We propose a novel two-step method to train a discriminator that is able to distinguish between "real" and "fake" price and volume time series as a part of GAN with self-attention, and then utilize it within an optimization framework to tune parameters of a simulator model with known agent archetypes to represent a market scenario. We conclude with experimental results that demonstrate effectiveness of our method.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Storchan & Svitlana Vyetrenko & Tucker Balch, 2021. "Learning who is in the market from time series: market participant discovery through adversarial calibration of multi-agent simulators," Papers 2108.00664, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2108.00664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.00664
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junyi Li & Xitong Wang & Yaoyang Lin & Arunesh Sinha & Micheal P. Wellman, 2020. "Generating Realistic Stock Market Order Streams," Papers 2006.04212, arXiv.org.
    2. Vince Darley & Alexander V Outkin, 2007. "A NASDAQ Market Simulation:Insights on a Major Market from the Science of Complex Adaptive Systems," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6217.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Namid R. Stillman & Rory Baggott & Justin Lyon & Jianfei Zhang & Dingqiu Zhu & Tao Chen & Perukrishnen Vytelingum, 2023. "Deep Calibration of Market Simulations using Neural Density Estimators and Embedding Networks," Papers 2311.11913, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    2. Song Wei & Andrea Coletta & Svitlana Vyetrenko & Tucker Balch, 2023. "INTAGS: Interactive Agent-Guided Simulation," Papers 2309.01784, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saki Kawakubo & Kiyoshi Izumi & Shinobu Yoshimura, 2014. "Analysis Of An Option Market Dynamics Based On A Heterogeneous Agent Model," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 105-128, April.
    2. Svitlana Vyetrenko & David Byrd & Nick Petosa & Mahmoud Mahfouz & Danial Dervovic & Manuela Veloso & Tucker Hybinette Balch, 2019. "Get Real: Realism Metrics for Robust Limit Order Book Market Simulations," Papers 1912.04941, arXiv.org.
    3. Mark Paddrik & Roy Hayes & William Scherer & Peter Beling, 2017. "Effects of limit order book information level on market stability metrics," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 12(2), pages 221-247, July.
    4. Gelman, Sergey & Lushchikov, Roman, 2015. "Stock liquidity in forefront of anticipated announcements," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113176, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Xintong Wang & Christopher Hoang & Yevgeniy Vorobeychik & Michael P. Wellman, 2021. "Spoofing the Limit Order Book: A Strategic Agent-Based Analysis," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-43, May.
    6. Georges, Christophre, 2008. "Staggered updating in an artificial financial market," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 2809-2825, September.
    7. Andjelka Kelic & Zachary A. Collier & Christopher Brown & Walter E. Beyeler & Alexander V. Outkin & Vanessa N. Vargas & Mark A. Ehlen & Christopher Judson & Ali Zaidi & Billy Leung & Igor Linkov, 2013. "Decision framework for evaluating the macroeconomic risks and policy impacts of cyber attacks," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 544-560, December.
    8. Richard Bookstaber, 2012. "Using Agent-Based Models for Analyzing Threats to Financial Stability," Working Papers 12-03, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    9. Didier SORNETTE, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based Models," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 14-25, Swiss Finance Institute.
    10. Yash Thesia & Vidhey Oza & Priyank Thakkar, 2022. "A dynamic scenario‐driven technique for stock price prediction and trading," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 653-674, April.
    11. Takanobu Mizuta, 2019. "An agent-based model for designing a financial market that works well," Papers 1906.06000, arXiv.org.
    12. Zijian Shi & Yu Chen & John Cartlidge, 2021. "The LOB Recreation Model: Predicting the Limit Order Book from TAQ History Using an Ordinary Differential Equation Recurrent Neural Network," Papers 2103.01670, arXiv.org.
    13. Liudmila G. Egorova, 2014. "The Effectiveness Of Different Trading Strategies For Price-Takers," HSE Working papers WP BRP 29/FE/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    14. Colin M. Van Oort & Ethan Ratliff-Crain & Brian F. Tivnan & Safwan Wshah, 2023. "Adaptive Agents and Data Quality in Agent-Based Financial Markets," Papers 2311.15974, arXiv.org.
    15. Rama Cont & Mihai Cucuringu & Renyuan Xu & Chao Zhang, 2022. "Tail-GAN: Learning to Simulate Tail Risk Scenarios," Papers 2203.01664, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    16. Zijian Shi & John Cartlidge, 2021. "The Limit Order Book Recreation Model (LOBRM): An Extended Analysis," Papers 2107.00534, arXiv.org.
    17. Richard Bookstaber & Mark Paddrik, 2015. "An Agent-Based Model of Liquidity," Working Papers 15-18, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    18. D. Sornette, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models," Papers 1404.0243, arXiv.org.
    19. Xinhui Yang & Jie Zhang & Qing Ye, 2020. "Tick size and market quality: Simulations based on agent‐based artificial stock markets," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 125-141, July.
    20. Georges, Christophre & Wallace, John C., 2009. "Learning Dynamics And Nonlinear Misspecification In An Artificial Financial Market," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(5), pages 625-655, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2108.00664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.