IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1702.01936.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Existence, uniqueness and stability of optimal portfolios of eligible assets

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Baes
  • Pablo Koch-Medina
  • Cosimo Munari

Abstract

In a capital adequacy framework, risk measures are used to determine the minimal amount of capital that a financial institution has to raise and invest in a portfolio of pre-specified eligible assets in order to pass a given capital adequacy test. From a capital efficiency perspective, it is important to identify the set of portfolios of eligible assets that allow to pass the test by raising the least amount of capital. We study the existence and uniqueness of such optimal portfolios as well as their sensitivity to changes in the underlying capital position. This naturally leads to investigating the continuity properties of the set-valued map associating to each capital position the corresponding set of optimal portfolios. We pay special attention to lower semicontinuity, which is the key continuity property from a financial perspective. This "stability" property is always satisfied if the test is based on a polyhedral risk measure but it generally fails once we depart from polyhedrality even when the reference risk measure is convex. However, lower semicontinuity can be often achieved if one if one is willing to focuses on portfolios that are close to being optimal. Besides capital adequacy, our results have a variety of natural applications to pricing, hedging, and capital allocation problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Baes & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2017. "Existence, uniqueness and stability of optimal portfolios of eligible assets," Papers 1702.01936, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1702.01936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.01936
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Frittelli & Giacomo Scandolo, 2006. "Risk Measures And Capital Requirements For Processes," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 589-612, October.
    2. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff & Stefan Weber, 2015. "Measures of Systemic Risk," Papers 1502.07961, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
    3. John H. Cochrane & Jesus Saa-Requejo, 2000. "Beyond Arbitrage: Good-Deal Asset Price Bounds in Incomplete Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(1), pages 79-119, February.
    4. J. P. Crouzeix, 1980. "Conditions for Convexity of Quasiconvex Functions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 120-125, February.
    5. Yannick Armenti & Stephane Crepey & Samuel Drapeau & Antonis Papapantoleon, 2015. "Multivariate Shortfall Risk Allocation and Systemic Risk," Papers 1507.05351, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2017.
    6. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    7. Walter Farkas & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2014. "Beyond cash-additive risk measures: when changing the numéraire fails," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 145-173, January.
    8. Artzner, Philippe & Delbaen, Freddy & Koch-Medina, Pablo, 2009. "Risk Measures and Efficient use of Capital 1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 101-116, May.
    9. Walter Farkas & Pablo Koch-Medina & Cosimo Munari, 2012. "Beyond cash-additive risk measures: when changing the num\'{e}raire fails," Papers 1206.0478, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2014.
    10. Charalambos D. Aliprantis & Kim C. Border, 2006. "Infinite Dimensional Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-29587-7, September.
    11. Dilip B. Madan & Alexander Cherny, 2010. "Markets As A Counterparty: An Introduction To Conic Finance," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(08), pages 1149-1177.
    12. Hans Föllmer & Alexander Schied, 2002. "Convex measures of risk and trading constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 429-447.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Embrechts & Alexander Schied & Ruodu Wang, 2018. "Robustness in the Optimization of Risk Measures," Papers 1809.09268, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    2. Michel Baes & Cosimo Munari, 2017. "A continuous selection for optimal portfolios under convex risk measures does not always exist," Papers 1711.00370, arXiv.org.
    3. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich & Gregor Svindland, 2018. "Risk sharing for capital requirements with multidimensional security markets," Papers 1809.10015, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas H. Hamel & Frank Heyde, 2021. "Set-Valued T -Translative Functions and Their Applications in Finance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-33, September.
    2. Maria Arduca & Cosimo Munari, 2021. "Risk measures beyond frictionless markets," Papers 2111.08294, arXiv.org.
    3. Michel Baes & Cosimo Munari, 2020. "A continuous selection for optimal portfolios under convex risk measures does not always exist," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(1), pages 5-23, February.
    4. Farkas, Walter & Koch-Medina, Pablo & Munari, Cosimo, 2014. "Capital requirements with defaultable securities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 58-67.
    5. Sascha Desmettre & Christian Laudagé & Jörn Sass, 2020. "Good-Deal Bounds for Option Prices under Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall Constraints," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Cosimo Munari & Stefan Weber & Lutz Wilhelmy, 2023. "Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(2), pages 329-380, June.
    7. Michel Baes & Cosimo Munari, 2017. "A continuous selection for optimal portfolios under convex risk measures does not always exist," Papers 1711.00370, arXiv.org.
    8. Andreas H Hamel, 2018. "Monetary Measures of Risk," Papers 1812.04354, arXiv.org.
    9. Laudagé, Christian & Sass, Jörn & Wenzel, Jörg, 2022. "Combining multi-asset and intrinsic risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 254-269.
    10. W. Farkas & A. Smirnow, 2016. "Intrinsic risk measures," Papers 1610.08782, arXiv.org.
    11. Erio Castagnoli & Giacomo Cattelan & Fabio Maccheroni & Claudio Tebaldi & Ruodu Wang, 2021. "Star-shaped Risk Measures," Papers 2103.15790, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    12. Cosimo Munari, 2020. "Multi-utility representations of incomplete preferences induced by set-valued risk measures," Papers 2009.04151, arXiv.org.
    13. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    14. Fei Sun & Jingchao Li & Jieming Zhou, 2018. "Dynamic risk measures with fluctuation of market volatility under Bochne-Lebesgue space," Papers 1806.01166, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    15. Pablo Koch-Medina & Santiago Moreno-Bromberg & Cosimo Munari, 2014. "Capital adequacy tests and limited liability of financial institutions," Papers 1401.3133, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2014.
    16. Xue Dong He & Xianhua Peng, 2017. "Surplus-Invariant, Law-Invariant, and Conic Acceptance Sets Must be the Sets Induced by Value-at-Risk," Papers 1707.05596, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    17. Hans Rau-Bredow, 2019. "Bigger Is Not Always Safer: A Critical Analysis of the Subadditivity Assumption for Coherent Risk Measures," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Samuel Drapeau & Michael Kupper, 2013. "Risk Preferences and Their Robust Representation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 28-62, February.
    19. Maria Arduca & Cosimo Munari, 2020. "Fundamental theorem of asset pricing with acceptable risk in markets with frictions," Papers 2012.08351, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    20. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Time consistency for scalar multivariate risk measures," Papers 1810.04978, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1702.01936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.