Beyond Arbitrage: "Good-Deal" Asset Price Bounds in Incomplete Markets
AbstractIt is often useful to price assets and other random payoffs by reference to other observed prices rather than construct full-fledged economic asset pricing models. This approach breaks down if one cannot find a perfect replicating portfolio. We impose weak economic restrictions to derive usefully tight bounds on asset prices in this situation. The bounds basically rule out high Sharpe ratios - `good deals' - as well as arbitrage opportunities. We present the method of calculation, we extend it to a multiperiod context by finding a recursive solution, and we apply it to option pricing examples including the Black-Scholes setup with infrequent trading, and a model with stochastic stock volatility and a varying riskfree rate.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Center for Research in Security Prices, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago in its series CRSP working papers with number 430.
Date of creation: Jan 1998
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 725 South Wells Street, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60607-4501
Web page: http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/finance/papers/
More information through EDIRC
Other versions of this item:
- John H. Cochrane & Jesus Saa-Requejo, 2000. "Beyond Arbitrage: Good-Deal Asset Price Bounds in Incomplete Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(1), pages 79-119, February.
- John H. Cochrane & Jesus Saa-Requejo, 1996. "Beyond Arbitrage: "Good-Deal" Asset Price Bounds in Incomplete Markets," NBER Working Papers 5489, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Morten Mosegaard Christensen & Eckhard Platen, 2007.
"Sharpe Ratio Maximization And Expected Utility When Asset Prices Have Jumps,"
International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.,
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(08), pages 1339-1364.
- Morten Christensen & Eckhard Platen, 2005. "Sharpe Ratio Maximization and Expected Utility when Asset Prices have Jumps," Research Paper Series, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney 170, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
- Peter Ryan, 2000. "Tighter Option Bounds from Multiple Exercise Prices," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 155-188, May.
- Nicolae Garleanu & Lasse Heje Pedersen & Allen M. Poteshman, 2009.
"Demand-Based Option Pricing,"
Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies,
Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(10), pages 4259-4299, October.
- Nicolae Garleanu & Lasse Heje Pedersen & Allen M. Poteshman, 2005. "Demand-Based Option Pricing," NBER Working Papers 11843, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Garleanu, Nicolae Bogdan & Pedersen, Lasse Heje & Poteshman, Allen M, 2005. "Demand-Based Option Pricing," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 5420, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Pierluigi Balduzzi & Cesare Robotti, 2001. "Minimum-variance kernels, economic risk premia, and tests of multi-beta models," Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 2001-24, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
- L. Carassus & E. Temam, 2014. "Pricing and hedging basis risk under no good deal assumption," Annals of Finance, Springer, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 127-170, February.
- HENROTTE, Philippe, 2002. "Pricing kernels and dynamic portfolios," Les Cahiers de Recherche 768, HEC Paris.
- Matos, Joao Amaro de & Lacerda, Ana, 2006. "Dry Markets and Statistical Arbitrage Bounds for European Derivatives," FEUNL Working Paper Series wp479, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia.
- Kerkhof, F.L.J. & Melenberg, B. & Schumacher, J.M., 2002. "Model Risk and Regulatory Capital," Discussion Paper, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research 2002-27, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Ángel León Valle & Antonio Vaello & Julio Carmona, 2009.
"Pricing executive stock options under employment shocks,"
Working Papers. Serie AD, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones EconÃ³micas, S.A. (Ivie)
2009-22, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
- Carmona, Julio & León, Angel & Vaello-Sebastià, Antoni, 2011. "Pricing executive stock options under employment shocks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 97-114, January.
- Alfredo IbÃ¡Ã±ez, 2005. "Option-Pricing in Incomplete Markets: The Hedging Portfolio plus a Risk Premium-Based Recursive Approach," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005, Society for Computational Economics 216, Society for Computational Economics.
- João Amaro de Matos & Paula Antão, 2001. "Super-replicating Bounds on European Option Prices when the Underlying Asset is Illiquid," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7.
- David S. Bates, 1999. "Financial Markets' Assessment of EMU," NBER Working Papers 6874, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Carmona, Julio & León, Ángel & Vaello-Sebastià, Antoni, 2012. "Executive Stock Options and Time Diversification," QM&ET Working Papers 12-16, Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Teoría Económica.
- Björk, Tomas & Slinko, Irina, 2004. "Towards a General Theory of Good Deal Bounds," Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 595, Stockholm School of Economics.
- Matos, Joao Amaro de & Lacerda, Ana, 2004. "Dry Markets and Superreplication Bounds of American Derivatives," FEUNL Working Paper Series wp461, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia.
- Sara Biagini & Mustafa Pinar, 2012. "The best gain-loss ratio is a poor performance measure," Papers 1209.6439, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2012.
- Jan Voelzke, 2014. "Weakening the Gain-Loss-Ratio measure to make it stronger," CQE Working Papers, Center for Quantitative Economics (CQE), University of Muenster 3114, Center for Quantitative Economics (CQE), University of Muenster.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.