IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aly/journl/201705.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Fourth Industrial Revolution And Labour: A Marxian Theory Of Digital Production

Author

Listed:
  • Shahram Azhar

    (Habib University, Karachi, Pakistan)

Abstract

In recent years the birth of digital production has spurred a lively theoretical debate in political economy, seeking to understand the implications of immaterial labour for the labour theory of value. These discussions have identified a number of theoretical challenges pertaining to the conceptualization of capitalist production in digital space. In particular, scholars have been puzzled by the question of how the notion of abstract labour-time applies to immaterial labour, how the free use of websites applications is compatible with commodity production, what role users play in the production process, and whether digital firms can be simply seen as rent-seekers disengaged from value-production altogether. In this paper I present an answer to these questions using Marxs Circuits of Capital model which allows a clear understanding of commodity production and labour-processes to be drawn in any microeconomic arrangement. I then complement this theoretical analysis with case examinations of the actual revenue processes of two major firms: Facebook and Google. Using this model, I demonstrate how digital production in these firms can be theoretically modelled as capitalist production, and how the monopoly profits of these mega corporations can be seen as ‘unpaid labour extractions from spatially segregated people all across the globe. Thus, in contrast to celebratory accounts that posit digital profits as ‘returns to innovation, the analysis presented here reveals how surplus-value ‘exploitation and the ‘law of uneven development plays itself out in the whole process, allowing the immense benefits of advancements in digital technology like other technological advances under capitalism to remain confined within a tiny elite that is physically located in a few advanced capitalist economies. The paper concludes that the latent possibilities of what has been termed the Fourth Industrial Revolution, despite its socializing and democratizing potential to connect millions of workers to consumers directly without the aid of capitalist intermediaries remain untapped as long as capitalist relations of production predominate the physical, and consequently the virtual economic and political milieu

Suggested Citation

  • Shahram Azhar, "undated". "The Fourth Industrial Revolution And Labour: A Marxian Theory Of Digital Production," Review of Socio - Economic Perspectives 201705, Reviewsep.
  • Handle: RePEc:aly:journl:201705
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/my_documents/my_files/5_Azhar-Full_Paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://reviewsep.com/?page_id=243
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.19275/RSEP011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subhajit Basu, 2010. "Direct Taxation and E-Commerce: Possibility and Desirability," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global, vol. 1(1), pages 37-63, January.
    2. Resnick, Stephen A. & Wolff, Richard D., 1989. "Knowledge and Class," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226710235, September.
    3. Shaikh, Anwar, 2016. "Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199390632, Decembrie.
    4. Yi-Fen Chen & Chia-Wen Tsai & Shih-Mei Hsu, 2014. "How Online Consumer Reviews Influence Purchase Intention in Virtual Communities?," International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy (IJIDE), IGI Global, vol. 5(3), pages 40-50, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2020. "A note on financialization from a Classical-Keynesian standpoint," Department of Economics University of Siena 824, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    3. Eric Kemp‐Benedict, 2020. "Convergence of actual, warranted, and natural growth rates in a Kaleckian–Harrodian‐classical model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 851-881, November.
    4. Sophie Webber, 2015. "Randomising Development: Geography, Economics and the Search for Scientific Rigour," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(1), pages 36-52, February.
    5. Enrico Sergio Levrero & Giacomo Sbrenna, 2022. "Some Factors Affecting US Capital Profitability over the Last Decades," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 16(2), pages 77-101, December.
    6. Stephen Resnick & Richard Wolff, 2009. "The Class Analysis of Households Extended: Children, Fathers, and Family Budgets," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Graham Cassano (ed.), Class Struggle on the Home Front, chapter 4, pages 86-115, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Boundi-Chraki, Fahd & Perrotini-Hernández, Ignacio, 2021. "Absolute cost advantage and sectoral competitiveness: Empirical evidence from NAFTA and the European Union," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 162-173.
    8. Joan R. Rovira, 2017. "Secular stagnation and concentration of corporate power," Working Papers PKWP1704, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    9. Oberholzer, Basil, 2023. "Post-growth transition, working time reduction, and the question of profits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Phil Armstrong, 2020. "Can Heterodox Economics Make a Difference?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19964.
    11. Kerim Eser Afc{s}ar & Mehmet Ozyi~git & Yusuf Yuksel & Umit Ak{i}nc{i}, 2021. "Testing the Goodwin Growth Cycles with Econophysics Approach in 2002-2019 Period in Turkey," Papers 2106.02546, arXiv.org.
    12. Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
    13. Jacobo, Juan, 2022. "A multi time-scale theory of economic growth and cycles," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 143-155.
    14. Ellis Scharfenaker, 2022. "Statistical Equilibrium Methods In Analytical Political Economy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-309, April.
    15. Juan Pablo Mateo, 2017. "Capital accumulation in the center and the periphery along the neoliberal period: A comparative analysis of the United States, Spain and Brazil," Working Papers 1723, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    16. Luis Daniel Torres-González, 2020. "The Characteristics of the Productive Structure Behind the Empirical Regularities in Production Prices Curves," Working Papers 2016, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    17. Jonathan F. Cogliano & Roberto Veneziani & Naoki Yoshihara, 2022. "Computational methods and classical‐Marxian economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 310-349, April.
    18. Jonathan F. Cogliano, 2017. "Surplus Value Production and Realization in Marxian Theory - Applications to the U.S., 1987-2015," Working Paper Series 2017-01, Dickinson College, Department of Economics.
    19. Ugo Rossi, 2019. "The common-seekers: Capturing and reclaiming value in the platform metropolis," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1418-1433, December.
    20. David F. Ruccio, 1991. "Postmodernism and Economics," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 495-510, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digital Economy; Technology and Capitalism; Facebook Business Model;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B51 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aly:journl:201705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Veysel KAYA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/degraus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.