IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajw/wpaper/06879.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effects of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act on FDA Review Times for Medical Devices

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Eric
  • Ferguson, Kelly

    (Mercury Publication)

Abstract

In the United States, the safety and efficacy of medical devices are regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which must successfully navigate a crucial tradeoff between speed and safety in approving applications for new devices. Although a

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Eric & Ferguson, Kelly, 2016. "Effects of the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act on FDA Review Times for Medical Devices," Working Papers 06879, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajw:wpaper:06879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mercury.mercatus.org/Product/ViewFinalCopy/221
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Grennan & Robert J. Town, 2020. "Regulating Innovation with Uncertain Quality: Information, Risk, and Access in Medical Devices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(1), pages 120-161, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weisheng Mao & Yexi Zhong, 2024. "The Influence of Demand-Based Policy Instruments on Urban Innovation Quality—Evidence from 269 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Alberto Galasso & Hong Luo, 2018. "When does Product Liability Risk Chill Innovation? Evidence from Medical Implants," NBER Working Papers 25068, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Galasso, Alberto & Luo, Hong, 2016. "Tort Reform and Innovation," CEPR Discussion Papers 11358, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Zhou, Jiehong & Jin, Yu & Liang, Qiao, 2021. "Quality inspection, information disclosure and wholesale vendors’ traceability adoption," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313943, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Galasso, Alberto & Luo, Hong, 2018. "How does product liability risk affect innovation? Evidence from medical implants," CEPR Discussion Papers 13036, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Tuncel, Tuba, 2022. "Should We Prevent Off-Label Drug Prescriptions? Empirical Evidence from France," TSE Working Papers 22-1383, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    7. Zhou, Jiehong & Jin, Yu & Liang, Qiao, 2022. "Effects of regulatory policy mixes on traceability adoption in wholesale markets: Food safety inspection and information disclosure," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Bucciol, Alessandro & Camboni, Riccardo & Valbonesi, Paola, 2020. "Purchasing medical devices: The role of buyer competence and discretion," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Shatrov, Kosta & Blankart, Carl Rudolf, 2022. "After the four-year transition period: Is the European Union's Medical Device Regulation of 2017 likely to achieve its main goals?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1233-1240.
    10. Gaurab Aryal & Federico Ciliberto & Leland E. Farmer & Ekaterina Khmelnitskaya, 2022. "Valuing Pharmaceutical Drug Innovations," Papers 2212.07384, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    11. McKibbin, Rebecca, 2023. "The effect of RCTs on drug demand: Evidence from off-label cancer drugs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Alberto Galasso & Hong Luo, 2016. "Tort Reform and Innovation," NBER Working Papers 22712, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajw:wpaper:06879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Ronyak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mcgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.