IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aiu/abewps/08.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The FTSE Global Islamic and the Risk Dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Noor Hashim

    (A'ayan Arabia Holding)

Abstract

Risk typically represents investments’ double-edged sword. Quantifying the adequate amount of risk to be assumed could be difficult, especially when “too much risk could turn out to be too little.” Under Islamic finance, managing risk is even more challenging. On the one hand, assuming high levels of risk is not encouraged. On the other, Islamic screening rules restrict investment and consequently stimulate risk. This paper considers the above dilemma by examining the effect of adopting screening rules on stock indices risk. The study, conducted using monthly data from FTSE Global Islamic, tests the hypothesis that the Islamic index yields adequate returns for the level of risk undertaken. Results show that the Islamic index surpasses the socially responsible index in performance while operating in line with the market. This risk assessment result does not resolve the dilemma but assures the economic appropriateness of the procedures adopted in managing the Islamic index.

Suggested Citation

  • Noor Hashim, 2008. "The FTSE Global Islamic and the Risk Dilemma," AIUB Bus Econ Working Paper Series AIUB-BUS-ECON-2008-08, American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Office of Research and Publications (ORP), revised Mar 2008.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiu:abewps:08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://orp.aiub.edu/FileZone/abewp/orpadmin-2008-088589862657090/AIUB-BUS-ECON-2008-08.pdf
    File Function: First version,
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haitham A. Al-Zoubi & Aktham I. Maghyereh, 2007. "The Relative Risk Performance Of Islamic Finance: A New Guide To Less Risky Investments," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 235-249.
    2. Hussein, Khaled A., 2004. "Ethical Investment: Empirical Evidence From Ftse Islamic Index," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 12, pages 22-40.
    3. Michael Schröder, 2007. "Is there a Difference? The Performance Characteristics of SRI Equity Indices," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1‐2), pages 331-348, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abu-Alkheil, Ahmad & Khan, Walayet A. & Parikh, Bhavik & Mohanty, Sunil K., 2017. "Dynamic co-integration and portfolio diversification of Islamic and conventional indices: Global evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 212-224.
    2. Shumi Akhtar & Maria Jahromi & Tom Smith, 2017. "Risk, return and mean-variance efficiency of Islamic and non-Islamic stocks: evidence from a unique Malaysian data set," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 3-46, March.
    3. Merdad, Hesham Jamil & Kabir Hassan, M. & Hippler, William J., 2015. "The Islamic risk factor in expected stock returns: an empirical study in Saudi Arabia," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 293-314.
    4. Zia-ur-Rehman Rao & Muhammad Zubair Tauni & Amjad Iqbal, 2015. "Comparison between Islamic and General Equity Funds of Pakistan: Difference in Their Performances and Fund Flow Volatility," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 1(2), pages 211-226, November.
    5. Omneya Abdelsalam & Meryem Duygun & Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2014. "Is Ethical Money Sensitive to Past Returns? The Case of Portfolio Constraints and Persistence of Islamic and Socially Responsible Funds," Working Papers 2014/19, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    6. Md Ejaz Rana & Waheed Akhter, 2015. "Performance of Islamic and conventional stock indices: empirical evidence from an emerging economy," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Omneya Abdelsalam & Meryem Duygun & Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2017. "Is Ethical Money Sensitive to Past Returns? The Case of Portfolio Constraints and Persistence in Islamic Funds," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 51(3), pages 363-384, June.
    8. Abdullah M. Al-Awadhi & Ahmad Bash & Ahmad F. Al-Mutairi & Ahmad M. Al-Awadhi, 2018. "Returns of Islamic Stocks in Saudi Arabia: Segmentation and Risk-Aversion," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 238-242.
    9. Faris Alshubiri, 2021. "Portfolio Returns of Islamic Indices and Stock Prices in GCC Countries: Empirical Evidence From the ARDL Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    10. Hosen, Mosharrof & Masih, Mansur, 2017. "Are Islamic risk factors blessings or curse for stock return? evidence from Malaysia based on dynamic GMM and quantile regression approaches," MPRA Paper 79738, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. EL AMRI Henda & HAMZA Taher, 2017. "Are There Causal Relationships Between Islamic Versus Conventional Equity Indices? International Evidence," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 12(1), pages 40-60, April.
    12. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Najah, Ahlem & Teulon, Frédéric, 2016. "Socially responsible investing and Islamic funds: New perspectives for portfolio allocation," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 351-361.
    13. Abdelsalam, Omneya & Duygun, Meryem & Matallín-Sáez, Juan Carlos & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2014. "Do ethics imply persistence? The case of Islamic and socially responsible funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 182-194.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dawood Ashraf, 2016. "Does Shari’ah Screening Cause Abnormal Returns? Empirical Evidence from Islamic Equity Indices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 209-228, March.
    2. Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Ferrer, Román & Ballester, Laura & Umar, Zaghum, 2017. "Risk transmission between Islamic and conventional stock markets: A return and volatility spillover analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 9-26.
    3. Shumi Akhtar & Maria Jahromi & Tom Smith, 2017. "Risk, return and mean-variance efficiency of Islamic and non-Islamic stocks: evidence from a unique Malaysian data set," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 3-46, March.
    4. Alkhazali, Osamah M. & Zoubi, Taisier A., 2020. "Gold and portfolio diversification: A stochastic dominance analysis of the Dow Jones Islamic indices," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Dewandaru, Ginanjar & Alaoui, AbdelKader & Bacha, Obiyathulla & Masih, Mansur, 2014. "Stock Market Co-movement and Shock Transmission: Islamic versus Conventional Equity Indices," MPRA Paper 56888, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier & Pop, Adrian, 2015. "Risk and ethical investment: Empirical evidence from Dow Jones Islamic indexes," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 33-56.
    7. Dewandaru, Ginanjar & Masih, Rumi & Bacha, Obiyathulla Ismath & Masih, A. Mansur M., 2017. "The role of Islamic asset classes in the diversified portfolios: Mean variance spanning test," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 66-95.
    8. Jamal Agouram & Jamaa Anoualigh & Lhoucine Ben Hssain & Ghizlane Lakhnati, 2021. "Performance and Risks: Islamic Indices and Compared to Conventional Indices," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(1), pages 17-26.
    9. Al-Khazali, Osamah & Mirzaei, Ali, 2017. "Stock market anomalies, market efficiency and the adaptive market hypothesis: Evidence from Islamic stock indices," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 190-208.
    10. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-401 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Faris Alshubiri, 2021. "Portfolio Returns of Islamic Indices and Stock Prices in GCC Countries: Empirical Evidence From the ARDL Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    12. Fu, Yufen & Wright, Danika & Blazenko, George, 2020. "Ethical Investing Has No Portfolio Performance Cost," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Onur Kemal Tosun, 2017. "Is corporate social responsibility sufficient enough to explain the investment by socially responsible funds?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 697-726, October.
    14. Kaouther Toumi Lajimi & Rana El Bahsh & Serge Agbodjo, 2017. "The determinants of bank profitability, does Islamic ethics perspective matter ? A comprehensive study on Islamic banks vs. Conventional ones," Post-Print hal-04109833, HAL.
    15. Aloui, Chaker & Hammoudeh, Shawkat & Hamida, Hela Ben, 2015. "Price discovery and regime shift behavior in the relationship between sharia stocks and sukuk: A two-state Markov switching analysis," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 121-135.
    16. Dharani, M. & Hassan, M. Kabir & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2019. "Faith-based norms and portfolio performance: Evidence from India," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 79-89.
    17. Linda Yu, 2014. "Performance Of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(3), pages 9-17.
    18. Naqvi, Bushra & Rizvi, S.K.A. & Mirza, Nawazish & Reddy, Krishna, 2018. "Religion based investing and illusion of Islamic Alpha and Beta," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 82-106.
    19. Krüger, Philipp, 2015. "Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 304-329.
    20. Ben Rejeb, Aymen, 2017. "On the volatility spillover between lslamic and conventional stock markets: A quantile regression analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 794-815.
    21. Andreas Hoepner & Ioannis Oikonomou & Bert Scholtens & Michael Schröder, 2016. "The Effects of Corporate and Country Sustainability Characteristics on The Cost of Debt: An International Investigation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1-2), pages 158-190, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiu:abewps:08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ziarat H. Khan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://orp.aiub.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.