IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278567.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conservation and Environmental Issues in Agriculture: An Economic Evaluation of Policy Options

Author

Listed:
  • Ervin, David
  • Algozin, Kenneth
  • Carey, Marc
  • Doering, Otto
  • Frerichs, Stephen
  • Heimlich, Ralph
  • Hrubovcak, Jum
  • Konyar, Kazim
  • McCormick, Ian
  • Osborn, Tim
  • Ribaudo, Marc
  • Shoemaker, Robbin

Abstract

Commodity program changes, such as planting flexibility, are estimated to achieve some net aggregate reductions in agrichemical use and erosion, while improving agriculture's market orientation and lowering government cost. However, the potential environmental effects vary widely by region. Although commodity program alteration can lessen some undesirable environmental effects in the short term, it does not remedy the basic externality causes of environmental problems. New land retirement approaches targeted to wetlands restoration and to land use change for water quality and other environmental services can achieve longrun environmental improvement. The net effects of land retirement on environmental quality, food and fiber production, consumer price, and government cost depend on simultaneous commodity program management. Any effects on commodities or the environment ultimately depend also on a host of external conditions (such as trade flows) affecting relative crop prices_ and input costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ervin, David & Algozin, Kenneth & Carey, Marc & Doering, Otto & Frerichs, Stephen & Heimlich, Ralph & Hrubovcak, Jum & Konyar, Kazim & McCormick, Ian & Osborn, Tim & Ribaudo, Marc & Shoemaker, Robbin, 1991. "Conservation and Environmental Issues in Agriculture: An Economic Evaluation of Policy Options," Staff Reports 278567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278567
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278567/files/ers-report-530.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heimlich, Ralph E. & Langner, Linda L., 1986. "Swampbusting: Wetland Conversion and Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 308005, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Young, C. Edwin & Osborn, C. Tim, 1990. "The Conservation Reserve Program: An Economic Assessment," Agricultural Economic Reports 262029, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Stan G. Daberkow & Katherine H. Reichelderfer, 1988. "Low-Input Agriculture: Trends, Goals, and Prospects for Input Use," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(5), pages 1159-1166.
    4. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Lee, Linda K., 1987. "The Magnitude And Costs Of Groundwater Contamination From Agricultural Chemicals: A National Perspective," Staff Reports 277938, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Earl O. Heady, 1948. "The Economics of Rotations with Farm and Production Policy Applications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(4), pages 645-664.
    6. Heimlich, Ralph E., 1989. "An Agricultural Wetland Reserve: Creating Wetlands from Drained Cropland," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270474, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Thomas P. Holmes, 1988. "The Offsite Impact of Soil Erosion on the Water Treatment Industry," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 64(4), pages 356-366.
    8. Miranowski, John & Hrubovcak, J. & LeBlanc, M., 1990. "Limitations in Evaluating Environmental and Agricultural Policy Coordination Benefits," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10697, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Shoemaker, Robbin & Anderson, Margot & Hrubovcak, James, 1990. "U.S. Farm Programs and Agricultural Resources," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309567, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Duffy, Michael & Chase, Craig, 1985. "Impacts of the 1985 Food Security Act on Crop Rotations and Fertilizer Use," ISU General Staff Papers 198501010800001210, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Hrubovcak, James & LeBlanc, Michael & Miranowski, John, 1990. "Limitations in Evaluating Environmental and Agricultural Policy Coordination Benefits," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 208-212, May.
    12. Thomas Rutherford, 1987. "A Modeling System for Applied General Equilibrium Analysis," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 836, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    13. Boyd, Roy, 1988. "An economic model of direct and indirect effects of tax reform on agriculture," Technical Bulletins 312290, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Reichelderfer, Katherine H., 1985. "Do USDA Farm Program Participants Contribute to Soil Erosion?," Agricultural Economic Reports 307990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. John E. Floyd, 1965. "The Effects of Farm Price Supports on the Returns to Land and Labor in Agriculture," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(2), pages 148-148.
    16. Evans, Sam, 1980. "Acreage Response To The Target Price And Set-Aside Provisions Of The Food And Agriculture Act Of 1977," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 32(4), pages 1-11, October.
    17. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Lee, Linda K., 1987. "The Magnitude and Costs of Groundwater Contamination from Agricultural Chemicals: A National Perspective," Agricultural Economic Reports 308032, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Jon R. Miller & Michael J. Hay, 1981. "Determinants of Hunter Participation: Duck Hunting in the Mississippi Flyway," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 677-684.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Colacicco, Daniel & Langner, Linda L. & Piper, Steven & Schaible, Glenn D., 1990. "Natural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program," Agricultural Economic Reports 308085, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Osteen, Craig D. & Szmedra, Philip I., 1989. "Agricultural Pesticide Use Trends and Policy Issues," Agricultural Economic Reports 308081, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Huang, Wen-Yuan & Uri, Noel D., 1991. "The Effect of Farming Practices on Reducing Excess Nitrogen Fertilizer Use: An Iowa Case Study," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271365, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Daberkow, Stan, 1987. "Agricultural Input Industry Indicators in 1974-85: Expansion and Contraction," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309404, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Vasavada, Utpal & Saint-Louis, Robert & Debailleul, Guy, 1990. "The Conflict Between Trade Policy and Environmental Policy in Agriculture," 1990: The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade Meeting, December 1990, San Diego, CA 50879, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    6. Crutchfield, Stephen R. & Brazee, Richard J., 1990. "An Integrated Model of Surface and Ground Water Quality," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271011, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Reichelderfer, Katherine H., 1989. "Water quality legislation affecting agriculture," Agricultural Outlook Forum Archive 1923 - 1997 326615, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    8. Mapp, Harry P., Jr., 1988. "Irrigated Agriculture On The High Plains: An Uncertain Future," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Bennett, Anne L. & Pannell, David J., 1998. "Economic evaluation of a weed-activated sprayer for herbicide application to patchy weed populations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-20.
    10. Dumper, Thomas A., 1989. "Magnitude and extent of water quality problems in the United States," Agricultural Outlook Forum Archive 1923 - 1997 326614, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    11. Ayer, Harry W., 0. "Agriculture And Groundwater Quality: The Arizona Experience," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.
    12. Babcock, Bruce A. & Pautsch, Gregory R., 1998. "Moving From Uniform To Variable Fertilizer Rates On Iowa Corn: Effects On Rates And Returns," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Carriker, Gordon L., 1993. "Factor Input Demand Subject to Economic and Environmental Risk: The Case of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Corn Production," Staff Papers 118154, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    14. Chu, Mei-chin & Swinton, Scott M. & Batie, Sandra S. & Dobbins, Craig & Doering, Otto, III & Ritchie, Joe T., 1995. "Designing Contracts To Reduce Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution," 1995 Annual Meeting, August 6-9, Indianapolis, Indiana 271474, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Runge, C. Ford, 1992. "Environmental Effects Of Trade In The Agricultural Sector: A Case Study," Working Papers 14449, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    16. Bor, Yunchang Jeffrey, 1997. "Some evidence for the existence of dynamic economic thresholds," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(2-3), pages 143-160.
    17. Diebel, Penelope & Taylor, Daniel & Batie, Sandra, 1991. "Low-Input Agriculture as a Groundwater Protection Strategy," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321457, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    18. Abdalla, Charles W., 0. "Agriculture And Ground Water Quality: Challenges And Opportunities For Public Policy Education," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.
    19. Abler, David G. & Musser, Wesley N., 1995. "The Allocation of LISA Research and Extension Funding," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 15-24, April.
    20. Abrahams, Nii Adote & Shortle, James S., 1997. "Uncertainty And The Regulation Of Nitrate Pollution From Agriculture," 1997 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Toronto, Canada 21027, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.