IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278365.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Political Economy of Agricultural Trade: A Review of the Literature on Domestic Policy Behavior and International Price Formation

Author

Listed:
  • Young, Linda
  • Marchant, Mary
  • McCalla, Alex

Abstract

This paper reviews broad literature on political economy as related to agricultural trade. A framework for the analysis of policy in markets subject to extensive government interventions is developed. Literature is reviewed that addresses domestic policy formation in the political arena and the linkages between domestic political choices and their ramifications in international markets. The literature is characterized by a wide variety of models and quantitative techniques. There appears to be no convergence to a general model for endogenizing government behavior as results are often conflicting. One recurring theme is that the problem should dictate the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Young, Linda & Marchant, Mary & McCalla, Alex, 1991. "The Political Economy of Agricultural Trade: A Review of the Literature on Domestic Policy Behavior and International Price Formation," Staff Reports 278365, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278365
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278365/files/ers-report-500.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tullock, Gordon & Campbell, Colin D, 1970. "Computer Simulation of a Small Voting System," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 80(317), pages 97-104, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marchant, Mary A. & McCalla, Alex F., 1990. "Endogenizing Government Behavior," 1990: The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade Meeting, December 1990, San Diego, CA 50886, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    2. S. von Cramon‐Taubadel, 1993. "The Reform Of The Cap From A German Perspective," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 394-409, September.
    3. Marchant, Mary A. & Neff, Steven A. & Xiao, Mei, 1997. "Political Economy of United States and European Union Dairy Policy Choice," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198045, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. McCalla, Alex F., 1993. "Agricultural Trade Liberalization: The Ever Elusive Grail," 1993 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Orlando, Florida 271407, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Abbott, Philip, 1999. "Agricultural commodity production and trade: a trade economist's view on filling US food supply gaps," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2-3), pages 181-195, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leombruni, Roberto & Richiardi, Matteo, 2005. "Why are economists sceptical about agent-based simulations?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 355(1), pages 103-109.
    2. Robert Bordley, 1985. "A precise method for evaluating election schemes," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 113-123, January.
    3. Roger Faith & James Buchanan, 1981. "Towards a theory of yes-no voting," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 231-245, January.
    4. Shmuel Nitzan, 1985. "The vulnerability of point-voting schemes to preference variation and strategic manipulation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 349-370, January.
    5. Matteo Richiardi & Roberto Leombruni & Nicole J. Saam & Michele Sonnessa, 2006. "A Common Protocol for Agent-Based Social Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15.
    6. Daniel Ladley & James Rockey, 2010. "Party Formation and Competition," Discussion Papers in Economics 10/17, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester, revised Mar 2014.
    7. Richard Wallick, 2012. "Agent-based modeling, public choice, and the legacy of Gordon Tullock," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 223-244, July.
    8. Brian L. Goff & Robert D. Tollison, 2003. "The Monopsony Power of the Median Voter," Public Finance Review, , vol. 31(2), pages 180-188, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.