IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uamsrr/161208.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Grain and Oilseed Shipment Sizes and Distance Hauled by Rail

Author

Listed:
  • Prater, Marvin
  • Sparger, Adam

Abstract

Grain and railroads have an interdependent relationship. Grain is one of the most important commodities for railroads. It is the primary agricultural commodity moved by rail, comprising 7.9 percent by tons of all commodities, 94 percent by tons of all farm commodities, and 8.4 percent of total rail revenue in 2009. In turn, railroads represent a vital component of the grain network, hauling 33 percent of all grain transported in the United States in 2007. As domestic and export markets have evolved, railroads have continuously made efficiency strides through shuttle trains and the length of haul. Since 1994, grain and oilseed transportation has moved from small shipment sizes to shuttle-size shipments (75 or more railcars) for many grains and oilseeds, reflecting the lower costs of shuttle-size shipments, an increase in the number of domestic destinations capable of unloading shuttle-size shipments, and increased grain and oilseed exports in some years. In addition, the length of haul has increased for grains and oilseeds, reflecting competitive advantages of rail compared to truck on longer hauls, lower rail tariffs per mile for longer hauls, and changing grain and oilseed markets. However, development of the shuttle market has occurred differently among grain types and has not been explored at the individual commodity level. This paper uses the Surface Transportation Board Confidential Waybill Samples to quantify the changes in shipment size and length of haul for each major grain and oilseed (corn, soybean, wheat, sorghum, and barley) from 1994 to 2009. Changes in shipment size and length of haul are compared to production and usage changes for each of the major grains and oilseeds to gain more insight into the underlying reasons behind the changes. This procedure improves upon earlier analyses of the grain shuttle-size market by exploring the changes at the individual commodity level. The shuttle market for each grain has developed differently because exports, production, and usage have been different despite the overall push towards larger and longer hauls by the railroads in order to maximize efficiency. In 1994, the dominant size of shipment for all 5 grains was 6 to 49 railcars. However, there were initial differences in the lengths of haul: corn, soybeans, and barley were hauled mostly between 20 and 500 miles in 1994, but wheat and sorghum were hauled between 501 and 1,000 miles. By 2009, corn and soybeans were mostly hauled more than 1,500 miles, but the predominant category for each of the other grains did not change. Wheat has been the most consistent of the five grains over the period of study with very little change in exports, production, or usage. As such, it has had the fewest changes in shipment size or length of haul; the dominant shipment size and length of haul have remained the same throughout the time period. In contrast, a production increase in corn and soybeans due to corn-based ethanol and soybean exports has led to more shuttle-sized shipments of these commodities. Exports, the rise of large dairies, and a shift in animal production to regions distant from corn and soybean production regions have resulted in lengths of haul in excess of 1,500 miles becoming predominant. Soybeans have had the most dramatic change in length of haul because of increased exports and shipments to large animal feed regions which are not as susceptible to truck competition, as evidenced by rail’s increase in market share. On the other hand, corn’s length of haul has been mostly more than 1,500 miles only since 2008 when more ethanol plants were built, leading to stronger truck competition for the shorter movements to ethanol facilities and taking away some of rail’s share. Shuttle markets have developed differently for sorghum and barley despite decreased production in both. Sorghum for ethanol production and a higher percentage of exports among total usage have led to an increase in shuttle-sized shipments even though less is being exported overall. Barley production has declined due to corn and soybeans being more profitable, and barley exports have declined without a strong export demand. The predominant barley shipment size of 6 to 49 railcars and length of haul between 20 and 500 miles makes rail shipment of barley more susceptible to truck competition and has caused rail to lose market share over the time period.

Suggested Citation

  • Prater, Marvin & Sparger, Adam, 2013. "Grain and Oilseed Shipment Sizes and Distance Hauled by Rail," Research Reports 161208, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uamsrr:161208
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.161208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/161208/files/Grain%20Shipment%20Sizes.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.161208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Camilo Sarmiento & William W. Wilson, 2005. "Spatial Modeling in Technology Adoption Decisions: The Case of Shuttle Train Elevators," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(4), pages 1034-1045.
    2. Casavant, Ken & Jessup, Eric & Prater, Marvin E. & Blanton, Bruce & Bahizi, Pierre & Nibarger, Daniel & Hill, Johnny & Weingram, Isaac, 2011. "Rail Rate and Revenue Changes Since the Staggers Act," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 50(1).
    3. Kenkel, Philip L. & Henneberry, Shida Rastegari & Agustini, Haerani N., 2004. "An Economic Analysis Of Unit-Train Facility Investment," 2004 Annual Meeting, February 14-18, 2004, Tulsa, Oklahoma 34748, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sparger, Adam & Prater, Marvin, 2012. "A Comprehensive Rail Rate Index for Grain," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 51(2).
    2. Kathleen P. Bell & Timothy J. Dalton, 2007. "Spatial Economic Analysis in Data‐Rich Environments," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 487-501, September.
    3. Dmytro KOZACHENKO & Roman VERNIGORA & Volodymyr BALANOV & Nazar SANNYTSKYY & Nikolay BEREZOVY & Tetiana BOLVANOVSKA, 2016. "Improving The Methods Of Estimation Of The Unit Train Effectiveness," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 11(3), pages 91-101, September.
    4. Sichao Jiang & James Nolan & Wesley W. Wilson, 2022. "Exit Decisions in the Canadian Grain Elevator Industry," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Kevin Henrickson & Wesley Wilson, 2013. "Voting, Regulation, and the Railroad Industry: An Analysis of Private and Public Interest Voting Patterns," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 43(1), pages 21-39, August.
    6. Camilo Sarmiento & William W. Wilson & Bruce Dahl, 2012. "Spatial Competition and Ethanol Plant Location Decisions," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 260-273, June.
    7. Hyland, Michael F. & Mahmassani, Hani S. & Bou Mjahed, Lama, 2016. "Analytical models of rail transportation service in the grain supply chain: Deconstructing the operational and economic advantages of shuttle train service," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 294-315.
    8. Prater, Marvin & Sparger, Adam, 2012. "Grain and Oilseed Shipment Sizes and Distance Hauled by Rail," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207122, Transportation Research Forum.
    9. Golden, Dana, 2020. "Basis as a Game: Game Theory and Determination of Cash Grain Prices," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304194, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Bitzan, John D. & Karanki, Fecri, 2022. "Costs, density economies, and differential pricing in the U.S. railroad industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 67-77.
    11. Carlos Hernán González-Campo & Vanessa Zamora Mina, 2020. "Comportamiento de los agentes en el comercio electrónico según modelos de localización," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 28(1), pages 47-65, June.
    12. Anton Bekkerman & Mykel Taylor, 2020. "The Role of Spatial Density and Technological Investment on Optimal Pricing Strategies in the Grain Handling Industry," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 57(1), pages 27-58, August.
    13. Ndembe, Elvis & Bitzan, John, 2018. "Grain freight elevator consolidation, transportation demand, and the growth of shuttle facilities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 54-60.
    14. William Wilson & Prithviraj Lakkakula, 2021. "Secondary rail car markets for grain transportation and basis values," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 472-488, July.
    15. Javier Ho & Paul Bernal, 2021. "Estimating a global demand model for soybean traffic through the Panama Canal," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Andrey BORODIN & Vitaly PANIN, 2018. "The Distribution Of Marshalling Work Of Industrial And Mainline Rail Transport," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 13(4), pages 37-46, December.
    17. Shi Zheng & Pei Xu & Zhigang Wang, 2012. "Farmers' adoption of new plant varieties under variety property right protection," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 124-140, January.
    18. Ndembe, Elvis, 2015. "Hard Red Spring Wheat Marketing: Effects of Increased Shuttle Train Movements on Railroad Pricing in the Northern Plains," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 54(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Marketing;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uamsrr:161208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/amsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.