IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ualbpr/232373.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Returns to Farmland Investment in Alberta, 1964-89

Author

Listed:
  • Phillips, W.
  • Bauer, L.
  • Akabua, K.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the performance of Alberta farmland relative to investment opportunities from financial securities. It is an extension of an earlier study undertaken by Mercier (1988) and Phillips et al. (1989). This study re-examines the period from 1964 to 1985, and extends the data series to 1989. The results show that Alberta farmland out performed the stock market in both nominal and real terms, but with greater volatility. In nominal terms, farmland had an annual return of 19.8% as opposed to 12.2% in the stock market. The standard deviation of returns in farmland was 20.6% compared to 16.2%. The real return for farmland was 12.6% whereas the stock market earned 5.9%. About 55% of the total return to investment in Alberta farmland was due to capital gain; measured in real terms, income accounted for the major portion at about 66%. Farmland and stock market returns were found to be uncorrelated in both nominal and real terms. Beta values, which measure the degree of association, were estimated at -0.1632 and -0.1351 for nominal and real terms respectively. Neither nominal nor real beta values were significantly different from zero at the 5% probability level. These results are not inconsistent with earlier studies, and are attributed to the fact that returns in agriculture are subject to a different set of economic and environmental influences than are present for the stock market generally. This suggests possibilities for risk reduction by including stock market investments in conjunction with farmland ownership. Whereas no correlation was found between farmland and the stock market, returns in excess of what can be explained by compensation for risk were detected. The estimated alpha values of 11.27% and 10.21% for the nominal and real situations were significantly different from zero at the 5% level of probability. These values may be due, partially, to the fact that real estate taxes were not deducted in computing the results. Furthermore, the costs of administration in farmland investments, because of the much less formal market environment in which they are held, may be considerably greater than for the stock market. In addition,' stock market investments are considerably more divisible and liquid than is the farmland counterpart. Factors such as these bear further study.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillips, W. & Bauer, L. & Akabua, K., 1993. "Returns to Farmland Investment in Alberta, 1964-89," Project Report Series 232373, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ualbpr:232373
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/232373/files/ualberta-projectreports-93-08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.232373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alchian, Armen A & Demsetz, Harold, 1972. "Production , Information Costs, and Economic Organization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(5), pages 777-795, December.
    2. Stephen A. Ross, 2013. "The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 1, pages 11-30, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Bruce Bjornson & Robert Innes, 1992. "Another Look at Returns to Agricultural and Nonagricultural Assets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(1), pages 109-119.
    4. Featherstone, Allen M. & Baker, Timothy G., 1985. "Farm Sector Real Asset Dynamics," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278656, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    6. Roll, Richard & Ross, Stephen A, 1980. "An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 35(5), pages 1073-1103, December.
    7. Phillips, W.E. & Bauer, L. & Mercier, J.E. & Mumey, G.A., 1989. "Alberta Farmland Asset Returns in the Context of Portfolio Investment," Project Report Series 232079, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    8. Tim T. Phipps, 1984. "Land Prices and Farm-Based Returns," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(4), pages 422-429.
    9. Peter J. Barry, 1980. "Capital Asset Pricing and Farm Real Estate," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(3), pages 549-553.
    10. William E. Kost, 1968. "Rates of Return for Farm Real Estate and Common Stock," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 50(2), pages 213-224.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanson, Steven D., 1999. "A Simple Framework For Determining The Fundamental Agricultural-Use Value Of Michigan Farmland," Staff Paper Series 11641, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    2. David Morelli, 2002. "The robustness of tests of structural change in equity returns using factor analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 241-251.
    3. Saggese, Pietro & Belmonte, Alessandro & Dimitri, Nicola & Facchini, Angelo & Böhme, Rainer, 2023. "Arbitrageurs in the Bitcoin ecosystem: Evidence from user-level trading patterns in the Mt. Gox exchange platform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 251-270.
    4. Jeonggyu Huh, 2018. "Measuring Systematic Risk with Neural Network Factor Model," Papers 1809.04925, arXiv.org.
    5. John G. Cragg & Burton G. Malkiel, 1982. "References, Index," NBER Chapters, in: Expectations and the Structure of Share Prices, pages 167-176, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Moon K. Kim & Chunchi Wu, 1987. "Macro-Economic Factors And Stock Returns," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 10(2), pages 87-98, June.
    7. Miranda Sarmento, J. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2014. "Public-Private Partnerships : Risk Allocation and Value for Money," Other publications TiSEM b9218010-a357-4c0a-805a-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Jon Poynter & James Winder & Tzu Tai, 2015. "An analysis of co-movements in industrial sector indices over the last 30 years," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 69-88, January.
    9. Fatemi, Ali M. & Tavakkol, Amir & Dukas, Stephen P., 1996. "Foreign exchange exposure and the pricing of exchange rate risk," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 169-189.
    10. Paul Munene Muiruri, 2014. "Effects of Estimating Systematic Risk in Equity Stocks in the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) (An Empirical Review of Systematic Risks Estimation)," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 228-248, October.
    11. Shaik, Saleem & Atwood, Joseph A. & Helmers, Glenn A., 2012. "Did 1933 new deal legislation contribute to farm real estate values: A regional analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 801-816.
    12. Justyna Franc-Dąbrowska & Magdalena Mądra-Sawicka & Joanna Bereżnicka, 2018. "Cost of Agricultural Business Equity Capital—A Theoretical and Empirical Study for Poland," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Alfred Mbairadjim Moussa & Jules Sadefo Kamdem, 2022. "A fuzzy multifactor asset pricing model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1221-1241, June.
    14. Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali, 2010. "Choix de portefeuille: comparaison des différentes stratégies [Portfolio selection: comparison of different strategies]," MPRA Paper 82946, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Dec 2010.
    15. Fredj Jawadi & Georges Prat, 2017. "Equity prices and fundamentals: a DDM–APT mixed approach," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 661-695, October.
    16. Nopphon Tangjitprom, 2012. "Macroeconomic Factors of Emerging Stock Market: The Evidence from Thailand," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(2), pages 105-114, April.
    17. Zura Kakushadze & Willie Yu, 2016. "Multifactor Risk Models and Heterotic CAPM," Papers 1602.04902, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2016.
    18. Geweke, John & Zhou, Guofu, 1996. "Measuring the Pricing Error of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(2), pages 557-587.
    19. Xia, Hui & Min, Xinyu & Deng, Shijie, 2015. "Effectiveness of earnings forecasts in efficient global portfolio construction," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 568-574.
    20. Martin Wallmeier, 2000. "Determinanten erwarteter Renditen am deutschen Aktienmarkt — Eine empirische Untersuchung anhand ausgewählter Kennzahlen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 27-57, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ualbpr:232373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/drualca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.