IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/slco10/183866.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessments and Application of Basic Financial Indicators in Fruit Production

Author

Listed:
  • Hadelan, Lari
  • Njavro, Mario
  • Par, Vjekoslav
  • Pazek, Karmen

Abstract

This paper’s aim is to evaluate importance of the basic financial indicators and its influence on the standardized project’s grade. The research was conducted using survey questionnaires to a sample of 14 experts in the field of microeconomics, who evaluated an importance of economic indicators in agriculture. Using Likert’s scale, they assessed importance of operating profit value, cost/income ratio, productivity and profitability indicators. Their grades were converted to utility coefficient (indicator’s priority) for the purpose of the group decision making in selecting fruit production. Analyzed fruit species achieved different financial indicator value. Based on indicator’s priority they were turned in normalized utility grade which enables fruit species ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadelan, Lari & Njavro, Mario & Par, Vjekoslav & Pazek, Karmen, 2010. "Assessments and Application of Basic Financial Indicators in Fruit Production," 2010 Conference: Modern management challenges in the agro-food sector, March 18-19, Pivola, Slovenia 183866, Slovenian Association of Agricultural Economists (DAES).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:slco10:183866
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.183866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/183866/files/17-Lari%20Hadelan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.183866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kay, Ronald D. & Edwards, William M., 1999. "Farm Management," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1374, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Kay, Ronald D. & Edwards, William M., 1999. "Farm Management: Instructor's Manual," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1373, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gicheha, M.G. & Edwards, G.R. & Bell, S.T. & Burtt, E.S. & Bywater, A.C., 2014. "Embedded risk management in dryland sheep systems II. Risk analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Nguyen, Nam C. & Wegener, Malcolm K. & Russell, Iean W. & Cameron, Donald & Coventry, David & Cooper, Ian M., 2007. "Risk management strategies by Australian farmers: two case studies," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 4(1-2), pages 1-8.
    3. Cemek, Bilal & Demir, Yusuf & Uzun, Sezgin & Ceyhan, Vedat, 2006. "The effects of different greenhouse covering materials on energy requirement, growth and yield of aubergine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1780-1788.
    4. David C. Hall & Thomas O. Knight & Keith H. Coble & Alan E. Baquet & George F. Patrick, 2003. "Analysis of Beef Producers' Risk Management Perceptions and Desire for Further Risk Management Education," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 430-448.
    5. Pham, Huong Dien & Waibel, Hermann, 2018. "Risk attitudes, knowledge, skills and agricultural productivity," TVSEP Working Papers wp-007, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, Institute of Development and Agricultural Economics, Project TVSEP.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance; Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:slco10:183866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daesiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.