IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333230.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Murray Darling Basin Plan amid Drought and Civil Discontent

Author

Listed:
  • Wittwer, Glyn

Abstract

The Australian government introduced the Water Act in 2007 in attempt to deal with sustainability within the Murray Darling Basin. This included a combination of buybacks of water entitlements from irrigators for the environment and irrigation infrastructure upgrades. Lobbyists railed against this, although buybacks were treated by many farmers as a financial option. TERM-H2O modelling indicated that farmers would benefit from terms-of-trade gains through the rising price of water that would more than offset income losses from reduced farm output. Now that the buyback process, regarded by economists as the most efficient way of obtaining water for the environment, has been suspended, policy has turned to relatively expensive infrastructure upgrades. This is against the background of record drought in 2019. The marginal impacts of infrastructure upgrades are minor compared with year-on-year changes in output due to seasonal variation. The welfare losses of upgrades are substantial. Since suspension of the buyback process arose from the perceived negative impact on the Basin economy, an alternative scenario is also examined. This time, the same public funds are directed towards provision of services in the Basin over twice the duration of the investment upgrades. Each dollar spend creates four times as many jobs as upgrades, and national welfare losses are a small fraction of those of upgrades.

Suggested Citation

  • Wittwer, Glyn, 2020. "The Murray Darling Basin Plan amid Drought and Civil Discontent," Conference papers 333230, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333230/files/9615.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wittwer, Glyn & Dixon, Janine, 2013. "Effective use of public funding in the Murray-Darling Basin: a comparison of buybacks and infrastructure upgrades," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 57(3).
    2. Peter B. Dixon & Maureen T. Rimmer & Glyn Wittwer, 2011. "Saving the Southern Murray‐Darling Basin: The Economic Effects of a Buyback of Irrigation Water," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 87(276), pages 153-168, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wittwer, Glyn, 2021. "A review of CGE modelling of irrigation developments and policies in Australia," Conference papers 333263, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Wittwer, Glyn, 2022. "Preparing a multi-country, sub-national CGE model: EuroTERM including Ukraine," Conference papers 333470, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Alec Zuo & Sarah Ann Wheeler & Peter Boxall & W. L. (Vic) Adamowicz & Darla Hatton MacDonald, 2015. "Identifying Water Prices at which Australian Farmers Will Exit Irrigation: Results of a Stated Preference Survey," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 91(S1), pages 109-123, June.
    4. Glyn Wittwer & Michael D Young, 2020. "Distinguishing Between Policy, Drought and International Events in the Context of the Murray Darling Basin Plan," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-295, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    5. Claire Settre & Jeff Connor & Sarah Ann Wheeler, 2017. "Reviewing the Treatment of Uncertainty in Hydro-economic Modeling of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(03), pages 1-35, July.
    6. Glyn Wittwer & Peter Dixon, 2011. "Water trading, buybacks and drought in the Murray-Darling basin: lessons from economic modelling," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-222, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    7. Dinar, Ariel, 2012. "Economy-wide implications of direct and indirect policy interventions in the water sector: lessons from recent work and future research needs," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6068, The World Bank.
    8. Victor Nechifor & Matthew Winning, 2017. "The impacts of higher CO2 concentrations over global crop production and irrigation water requirements," EcoMod2017 10487, EcoMod.
    9. James A. Giesecke & John R. Madden, 2013. "Evidence-based regional economic policy analysis: the role of CGE modelling," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 285-301.
    10. George Verikios & Xiao-guang Zhang, 2016. "Structural change and income distribution: the case of Australian telecommunications," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 549-570, October.
    11. Verikios, George & Zhang, Xiao-guang, 2013. "Structural change in the Australian electricity industry during the 1990s and the effect on household income distribution: A macro–micro approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 564-575.
    12. Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Zuo, Alec & Bjornlund, Henning, 2014. "Investigating the delayed on-farm consequences of selling water entitlements in the Murray-Darling Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 72-82.
    13. George Verikios, 2018. "Capital Account Liberalisation by China and the Effects on Global FDI and Trade," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 245-269, July.
    14. Perez Blanco, C.D., 2018. "Waters run deep: A coupled Revealed Preference and CGE model to assess the economy-wide impacts of agricultural water buyback," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277028, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Morrison, Mark & Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Hatton MacDonald, Darla, 2012. "Towards a more nuanced discussion of the net-benefits of sharing water in the Murray-Darling Basin," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Onil Banerjee & Martin Cicowiez & Mark Horridge & Renato Vargas, 2016. "A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Economic-Environmental Modelling," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0202, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    17. Wittwer, Glyn, 2015. "The TERM-H2O modeling experience in Australia," Conference papers 332657, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. Adamson, David, 2013. "Buying Paper and Giving Gold: The Murray Darling Basin Plan," Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers 156481, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    19. Grafton, R. Quentin & Horne, James, 2014. "Water markets in the Murray-Darling Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 61-71.
    20. Grafton, Rupert & Jiang, Qiang, 2011. "Economic effects of water recovery on irrigated agriculture in the Murray-Darling Basin," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1-13.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.