IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr13/206951.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Introduction Of Heavy Axle Loads By The North American Rail Industry, 1990 To 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Martland, Carl

Abstract

The Association of American Railroads initiated the Heavy Axle Load (HAL) Research Program in 1988 in order to “provide guidance to the North American railroad industry about whether to increase axle loads and to determine the most economic payload consistent with safety"(1). The research, which is still on-going, has demonstrated the technical feasibility and economic desirability of increasing axle loads and the ability of technology to mitigate the adverse effects of heavier loads. As a result of the initial phases of the HAL Research Program, the industry decided in 1991 to accept cars with 286,000 lb. gross vehicle weight (GVW) in interchange service. Since then, more than 90% of all bulk equipment acquired has been rated for 286k GVW. Today, nearly 100% of coal traffic and approximately 30-40% of general freight moves in 286k loads. Annual benefits of HAL operations to railroads, suppliers, and their customers now exceed $1 billion. Benefits include reduced capital and operating expenditures for bulk equipment, increases in net tons per train mile, better fuel efficiency, and increases in line capacity. Further benefits are now being realized by the introduction of shorter cars that retain the 286k GVW limit, while gaining most of the cost and capacity benefits of heavier cars. Technological improvements resulting from the HAL research program have been critical in enabling the industry to reduce costs of 286k operations. Some of the most important advances have been the use of better metallurgy, grinding and lubrication to control rail fatigue and extend rail life. Other technological innovations have extended the design and the life of turnouts and wheels. Bridge costs did not increase as much as was expected, in part because of technological developments and in part because of a better understanding of the ability of track and structures to withstand HAL loads. This paper begins by reviewing the motivation for and the results of the initial HAL research, including a summary of the expected costs and benefits of HAL implementation. It then documents the rate of implementation by showing the increases in average tons per carload for bulk commodities between 1990 and 2012. The greatest benefits have been achieved for coal, as this is the dominant bulk commodity handled by rain and the average tons per carload increased from less than 100 to more than 115 over this period. Estimates of benefits and engineering costs are based upon the framework established in the economic analyses of Phases I and II of the HAL Research Program and the results of subsequent studies related to HAL implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Martland, Carl, 2013. "Introduction Of Heavy Axle Loads By The North American Rail Industry, 1990 To 2012," 54th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Annapolis, Maryland, March 21-23, 2013 206951, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr13:206951
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.206951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/206951/files/8%20INTRODUCTION%20OF%20HEAVY%20AXLE%20LOADS%20BY%20THE%20NORTH%20AMERICAN%20RAIL%20INDUSTRY_%201990.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.206951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2012. "Transportation Research Forum," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207218, Transportation Research Forum.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Odolinski, Kristofer, 2016. "Estimating the impact of traffic on rail infrastructure maintenance costs: The importance of axle loads," Working papers in Transport Economics 2016:21, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI), revised 14 Nov 2018.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. JANSSENS, Jochen & DE CORTE, Annelies & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2016. "Water distribution network design optimisation with respect to reliability," Working Papers 2016007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. Xuan Phuong Nguyen, 2019. "The Bus Transportation Issue And People Satisfaction With Public Transport In Ho Chi Minh City ," Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments (JMERD), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 10-16, January.
    3. Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu & Chua, Kelman & Yu, Honghai & Zhao, Jinhua, 2021. "E-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 177-196.
    4. Sparger, Adam & Prater, Marvin, 2012. "A Comprehensive Rail Rate Index for Grain," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 51(2).
    5. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Aurélie Mercier, 2013. "A combined people-freight accessibility approach for urban retailing and leisure planning at strategic level," Post-Print halshs-00919537, HAL.
    6. Eléonora Morganti & Laetitia Dablanc & François Fortin, 2014. "Final deliveries for online shopping: the deployment of pickup point networks in urban and suburban areas," Post-Print hal-01067223, HAL.
    7. Steven A. Sass, 2014. "Privatizing Railroad Retirement," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number prr, November.
    8. Rubensson, Isak & Börjesson, Maria, 2018. "Satisfaction with crowding in public transport," Working papers in Transport Economics 2018:6, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    9. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Pierre Basck & Eleonora Morganti, 2013. "Urban logistics solutions and financing mechanisms: a scenario assessment analysis," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 54, pages 1-11.
    10. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Josep-Maria Salanova Grau, 2012. "Is urban logistics pooling viable? A multistakeholder multicriteria analysis," Post-Print halshs-00750752, HAL.
    11. Ofori Debrah & Nasiru Inusah & Joseph Yaw Dwommor, 2021. "Students' Satisfaction with Accounting Teachers' Lesson Delivery, the Role of Perceived Quality of Lesson Delivery in Ghanaian Senior High Schools," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 109-124, March.
    12. Shuli Luo & Sylvia Y He, 2021. "Using data mining to explore the spatial and temporal dynamics of perceptions of metro services in China: The case of Shenzhen," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 449-466, March.
    13. Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Eichi Taniguchi & Bruno Faivre d'Arcier, 2014. "Financing urban logistics projects. From public utility to public-private partnerships," Working Papers halshs-01074619, HAL.
    14. Ning Yin & Yapeng Wang, 2017. "Impacts of Rural Labor Resource Change on the Technical Efficiency of Crop Production in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Chang Albitres, Carlos M. & Krugler, Paul E. & Ibarra, Iraki & Montes, Edith, 2012. "A Dynamic Programming Optimization Approach for Budget Allocation to Early Right-of-Way Acquisitions," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 51(3).
    16. Tareq Bani-Khalid & Ahmad Farhan Alshira’h & Malek Hamed Alshirah, 2022. "Determinants of Tax Compliance Intention among Jordanian SMEs: A Focus on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    17. Martland, Carl D., 2012. "Productivity Improvements in the U.S. Rail Freight Industry 1980-2010," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207088, Transportation Research Forum.
    18. Anthony M. Pagano & Grace W.Y. Wang & Onésimo V. Sánchez & Ricardo Ungo, 2013. "Impact of privatization on port efficiency and effectiveness: results from Panama and US ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 100-115, March.
    19. Georgiana Madar & Hanna Maoh & William Anderson, 2020. "Examining the robustness of the Ontario truck road network," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 309-333, July.
    20. Alain Bonnafous & Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu & Jean-Louis Routhier, 2013. "An alternative UGM Paradigm to O-D matrices: the FRETURB model," Post-Print halshs-00844652, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr13:206951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.