IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iafepa/239250.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dilemmas in a financial dimension of sustainability of farms

Author

Listed:
  • Soliwoda, Michał

Abstract

Sustainability, as a specific inter- or even transdisciplinary “metacat-egory”, refers also to monetary processes. So far, a financial approach of sustainability of farms has not been explored. The aim of this paper was to highlight some theoretical and methodological issues related to a financial dimension of sustainability of farms. The research objectives were as fol-lows: (1) to link achievements in the area with theoretical and methodological apparatus for sustainable growth (in financial terms) of farms to concepts of sustainability, (2) to identify associations between the sustainable growth and selected agricultural farm management problems and agrarian policy. Relying on agricultural income category (including net farm income), excluding the farm’s financial situation, leads to a significant simplification that may deform an analytical framework for sustainability. The terms “sustainable growth”, “sustainable growth rate”, “sustainable intensification” may extend the current framework for analysing the sustainability of farms, as well as be a prerequisite for constructing/improving instruments that may support farm management, or monitoring and evaluation of the effects of agricultural policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Soliwoda, Michał, 2015. "Dilemmas in a financial dimension of sustainability of farms," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 239250, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iafepa:239250
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.239250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/239250/files/Soliwoda.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.239250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Figge & Tobias Hahn & Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2002. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(5), pages 269-284, September.
    2. Cesar L. Escalante & Calum G. Turvey & Peter J. Barry, 2009. "Farm business decisions and the sustainable growth challenge paradigm," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 69(2), pages 228-247, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kittiya Yongvanich & James Guthrie, 2006. "An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 309-321, September.
    2. Christoph Constantin Niemann & Petra Dickel & Gordon Eckardt, 2020. "The interplay of corporate entrepreneurship, environmental orientation, and performance in clean‐tech firms—A double‐edged sword," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 180-196, January.
    3. Chiara Mio & Andrea Venturelli, 2013. "Non‐financial Information About Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy in the Annual Reports of Listed Companies: Evidence from Italy and the UK," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 340-358, November.
    4. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    5. Jaroslava Hyršlová & Marie Kubáňková, 2009. "Sustainability Accounting as a Tool for Corporate Sustainability Performance Management [Účetnictví udržitelného rozvoje jako nástroj řízení výkonnosti podniku směrem k udržitelnému rozvoji]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(4), pages 46-55.
    6. Audley Genus, 2021. "Sustainable entrepreneurship research in the 2020s: An introduction," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1419-1422, March.
    7. Carolina Villamil & Jesko Schulte & Sophie Hallstedt, 2022. "Sustainability risk and portfolio management—A strategic scenario method for sustainable product development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1042-1057, March.
    8. Wynder, Monte, 2010. "Chemico: Evaluating performance based on the Balanced Scorecard," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 221-236.
    9. Ifft, Jennifer & Kuethe, Todd & Morehart, Mitch, 2015. "Does Federal Crop Insurance lead to higher farm debt use? Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey," Working Papers 250011, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    10. Hörisch, Jacob & Ortas, Eduardo & Schaltegger, Stefan & Álvarez, Igor, 2015. "Environmental effects of sustainability management tools: An empirical analysis of large companies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 241-249.
    11. Robert Perey & Suzanne Benn & Renu Agarwal & Melissa Edwards, 2018. "The place of waste: Changing business value for the circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 631-642, July.
    12. Jacek Kulawik, 2015. "Wspólna polityka rolna Unii Europejskiej w perspektywie globalnej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5, pages 119-143.
    13. Dongmin Kong & Xiandong Yang & Chen Liu & Wei Yang, 2020. "Business strategy and firm efforts on environmental protection: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 445-464, February.
    14. Ines Karra, 2021. "Resources and green strategic intent: towards improving the competitiveness of Tunisian industrial companies," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2016. "Outsourcing decisions in reverse logistics: Sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 41-53.
    16. Diego G. Ferber Pineyrua & Alfonso Redondo & José A. Pascual & Ángel M. Gento, 2021. "Knowledge Management and Sustainable Balanced Scorecard: Practical Application to a Service SME," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    18. Françoise Quairel, 2006. "Contrôle de la performance globale et responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise (RSE)," Post-Print halshs-00548050, HAL.
    19. Eva Regnier & Craig Tovey, 2007. "Time horizons of environmental versus non‐environmental costs: evidence from US tort lawsuits," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 249-265, May.
    20. Juan Gabriel Martínez-Navalón & Vera Gelashvili & Felipe Debasa, 2019. "The Impact of Restaurant Social Media on Environmental Sustainability: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iafepa:239250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ierigpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.