IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi21/317064.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Differenzierung der Organisationsstruktur als Anpassung an die Unternehmensumwelt: Agriholdings in den ostdeutschen Bundesländern

Author

Listed:
  • Laschewski, Lutz
  • Eberbach, Lisa
  • Tietz, Andreas

Abstract

In den letzten Jahrzehnten erfahren neue landwirtschaftliche Organisationsformen international eine wachsende Aufmerksamkeit, in denen einzelne landwirtschaftliche Unternehmen vertikal oder horizontal in größeren Unternehmensverbünden (Holdings) integriert sind. Trotz der wachsenden Evidenz der Entstehung solcher Organisationsmodelle befinden sich Forschung und theoretische Reflexion dieser Dynamiken zumindest in Deutschland noch sehr am Anfang. Vor diesem Hintergrund befasst sich der Beitrag mit „Agriholdings“ als neuem organisatorischem Muster, das vor allem in den ostdeutschen Bundesländern an Bedeutung gewinnt. Zur Erklärung des Phänomens greifen wir den Ansatz des neuen (soziologischen) Institutionalismus auf, der die Entstehung neuer Organisationsformen als einen kulturellen Wandel begreift. Die Wahl der Organisationsform wird demnach nicht, wie die meisten Theorien des agrarstrukturellen Wandels unterstellen, durch deren relative Wettbewerbsfähigkeit bestimmt, sondern durch das Bedürfnis nach Legitimation, welche die Organisationen aus ihrer Umwelt (dem Organisationsfeld) beziehen. Sie greifen dabei auf Organisationsmuster zurück, die in ihrer Umwelt als rational und damit als „legitim“ gelten können. Die theoretischen Annahmen des neuen (soziologischen) Institutionalismus werden in Unternehmensfallstudien, die in drei Regionen Ostdeutschlands durchgeführt wurden, weitgehend bestätigt. Dieser theoretische Zugang und die darauf aufbauenden soziologischen Feldtheorien erscheinen daher als vielversprechender Weg zur Analyse der aktuellen agrarstrukturellen Entwicklungen. Die Analyse der neuen landwirtschaftlichen Organisationsformen legt zudem nahe, dass es wichtig ist, die in der Debatte dominierende Dichotomie von Familien- und industrieller Landwirtschaft empirisch zu hinterfragen. Die Vielfalt der neu aufkommenden, oft hybriden Organisationsformen in der Landwirtschaft muss differenzierter betrachtet werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Laschewski, Lutz & Eberbach, Lisa & Tietz, Andreas, 2021. "Differenzierung der Organisationsstruktur als Anpassung an die Unternehmensumwelt: Agriholdings in den ostdeutschen Bundesländern," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317064, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi21:317064
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.317064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/317064/files/150-Laschewski_b.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.317064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Mathijs & Johan F. M. Swinnen, 2001. "Production Organization And Efficiency During Transition: An Empirical Analysis Of East German Agriculture," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(1), pages 100-107, February.
    2. Hermans, Frans & Chaddad, Fabio & Gagalyuk, Taras & Senesi, Sebastián & Balmann, Alfons, 2017. "The emergence and proliferation of agroholdings and mega farms in a global context," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 175-186.
    3. Hall, Peter A. & Taylor, Rosemary C. R., 1996. "Political science and the three new institutionalisms," MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yefimov, Vladimir, 2009. "Comparative historical institutional analysis of German, English and American economics," MPRA Paper 48173, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Maarten Hillebrandt, 2017. "Transparency as a Platform for Institutional Politics: The Case of the Council of the European Union," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 62-74.
    3. Broich, Tobias, 2017. "Do authoritarian regimes receive more Chinese development finance than democratic ones? Empirical evidence for Africa," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-207.
    4. Raitio, Kaisa, 2013. "Discursive institutionalist approach to conflict management analysis — The case of old-growth forest conflicts on state-owned land in Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 97-103.
    5. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    6. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:25-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Emil Evenhuis, 2017. "Institutional change in cities and regions: a path dependency approach," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 509-526.
    8. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01019642, HAL.
    9. Reibling, Nadine & Ariaans, Mareike & Wendt, Claus, 2019. "Worlds of Healthcare: A Healthcare System Typology of OECD Countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(7), pages 611-620.
    10. Streeck, Wolfgang, 2009. "Institutions in history: Bringing capitalism back in," MPIfG Discussion Paper 09/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    11. Bernhard Ebbinghaus, 2009. "Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change? Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform," Chapters, in: Lars Magnusson & Jan Ottosson (ed.), The Evolution of Path Dependence, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Maixe-Altes, J. Carles, 2009. "The diversity of organisational forms in banking: France, Italy and Spain 1900-2000," MPRA Paper 14838, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Baum, Fran & Ziersch, Anna & Freeman, Toby & Javanparast, Sara & Henderson, Julie & Mackean, Tamara, 2020. "Strife of Interests: Constraints on integrated and co-ordinated comprehensive PHC in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    14. Kaplan Yilmaz, 2017. "China’s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist Project," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 7-23, June.
    15. Rothe, Andrea & Lissitsa, Alexej, 2005. "Der ostdeutsche Agrarsektor im Transformationsprozess: Ausgangssituation, Entwicklung und Problembereiche [Agricultural sector of Eastern Germany during transition period – Initial situation, devel," IAMO Discussion Papers 81, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    16. Michael Grothe-Hammer & Héloïse Berkowitz, 2024. "Unpacking Social Order: Towards a Novel Framework that Goes Beyond Organizations, Institutions, and Networks Forthcoming in Critical Sociology," Post-Print hal-04426296, HAL.
    17. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
    18. Niamh Hardiman, 2007. "Governing the Economy," Working Papers 200739, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    19. James P Cross, 2013. "Everyone’s a winner (almost): Bargaining success in the Council of Ministers of the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(1), pages 70-94, March.
    20. Rizov, Marian, 2006. "Rural development perspectives in enlarging Europe: The implications of CAP reforms and agricultural transition in accession countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 219-238.
    21. Michal Ovádek, 2021. "Procedural Politics Revisited: Institutional Incentives and Jurisdictional Ambiguity in EU Competence Disputes," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1381-1399, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Environmental Economics and Policy;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi21:317064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.