IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi17/262180.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Solidarische Landwirtschft – Austrittsgründe Aus Perspektive Ehemaliger Mitglieder

Author

Listed:
  • Maschkowski, Gesa
  • Barth, Alice
  • Köngeter, Alexandra

Abstract

Die Zahl der Betriebe, die in Deutschland nach dem Prinzip der solidarischen Landwirtschaft wirtschaften, wächst. Über die Motive von Menschen, die ihre Mitgliedschaft wieder beenden ist jedoch nichts bekannt. Die Studie basiert auf einer Fallstudie (n=108) und einer bundesweiten Abbrecherbefragung (n=150). Als theoretische Grundlage dient die Theorie des Familienhaushaltes nach VON SCHWEITZER. Austritte erfolgen eher im ersten Jahr der Mitgliedschaft. Zu den Austrittsgründen gehören familiäre Vorlieben oder Abneigungen, Schwierigkeiten bei der Alltagsorganisation und der Faktor Zeit, Kritik am Preis/Leistungsverhältnis, der Qualität und Vielfalt sowie der Logistik. Die Studie gibt Hinweise für die Weiterentwicklung des Modells Solidarische Landwirtschaft.

Suggested Citation

  • Maschkowski, Gesa & Barth, Alice & Köngeter, Alexandra, 2017. "Solidarische Landwirtschft – Austrittsgründe Aus Perspektive Ehemaliger Mitglieder," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 262180, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi17:262180
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262180/files/Maschkowski_221.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262180/files/Maschkowski_221.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa & Taylor, Mykel R. & Baudouin, Quentin, 2015. "Preferences of locavores favoring community supported agriculture in the United States and France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-73.
    2. Jack P. Cooley & Daniel A. Lass, 1998. "Consumer Benefits from Community Supported Agriculture Membership," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 227-237.
    3. Lydia Zepeda & Anna Reznickova & Willow Russell, 2013. "CSA membership and psychological needs fulfillment: an application of self-determination theory," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(4), pages 605-614, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junhong Chen & Zhifeng Gao & Xuqi Chen & Lisha Zhang, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Dynamics of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Membership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-13, August.
    2. Wellner, Marie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2016. "Community Supported Agriculture Als Neuer Impuls Für Die Regionalvermarktung? Stand Der Forschung Und Abgrenzung Von Anderen Alternativen Lebensmittelnetzwerken," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244757, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Marie Diekmann & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2019. "Value structures determining community supported agriculture: insights from Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 733-746, December.
    4. Bernard, Kévin & Bonein, Aurélie & Bougherara, Douadia, 2020. "Consumer inequality aversion and risk preferences in community supported agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Salladarré, Frédéric & Guillotreau, Patrice & Debucquet, Gervaise & Lazuech, Gilles, 2018. "Some Good Reasons for Buying Fish Exclusively From Community-Supported Fisheries: The Case of Yeu Island in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 172-180.
    6. Emily H. Morgan & Michelle M. Severs & Karla L. Hanson & Jared McGuirt & Florence Becot & Weiwei Wang & Jane Kolodinsky & Marilyn Sitaker & Stephanie B. Jilcott Pitts & Alice Ammerman & Rebecca A. Seg, 2018. "Gaining and Maintaining a Competitive Edge: Evidence from CSA Members and Farmers on Local Food Marketing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Felix Zoll & Caitlin K. Kirby & Kathrin Specht & Rosemarie Siebert, 2023. "Exploring member trust in German community-supported agriculture: a multiple regression analysis," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 709-724, June.
    8. Tezcan Mert-Cakal & Mara Miele, 2020. "‘Workable utopias’ for social change through inclusion and empowerment? Community supported agriculture (CSA) in Wales as social innovation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1241-1260, December.
    9. Vassalos, Michael & Gao, Zhifeng & Zhang, Lisha, 2016. "Who are the CSA Consumers and how to Promote CSA to more Consumers?," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235872, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Bernard, Kévin & Bonein, Aurélie & Bougherara, Douadia, 2016. "Community Supported Agriculture and Preferences for Risk and Fairness," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 234904, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. G. Debucquet & P. Guillotreau & G. Lazuech & F. Salladarré & J. Troiville, 2020. "Sense of belonging and commitment to a community-supported fishery. The case of Yeu Island, France," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 439-459, December.
    12. Conner, David S., 2003. "Community Supported Agriculture Pricing and Promotion Strategies: Lessons from Two Ithaca, NY, Area Farms," EB Series 122132, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    13. Gabriel Cumming & Kristin Hunter-Thomson & Talia Young, 2020. "Local food 2.0: How do regional, intermediated, food value chains affect stakeholder learning? A case study of a community-supported fishery (CSF) program," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 68-82, March.
    14. Connolly, Cristina & Klaiber, H. Allen, 2019. "Competition in Local Food Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 44(2), May.
    15. Steven Schnell, 2013. "Food miles, local eating, and community supported agriculture: putting local food in its place," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(4), pages 615-628, December.
    16. Claudio Vitari & Erin Whittingham, 2018. "Tackling Conventional Agriculture: The Institutionalization of Community Supported Agriculture's (CSA) Principles," Post-Print halshs-01923789, HAL.
    17. Hasanzade, Vüsal & Elshiewy, Ossama & Toporowski, Waldemar, 2022. "Is it just the distance? Consumer preference for geographical and social proximity of food production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Sanneh, Njundu & Moffitt, L. Joe & Lass, Daniel A., 2001. "Stochastic Efficiency Analysis Of Community-Supported Agriculture Core Management Options," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Paulina Rytkönen & Håkan Tunón, 2020. "Summer Farmers, Diversification and Rural Tourism—Challenges and Opportunities in the Wake of the Entrepreneurial Turn in Swedish Policies (1991–2019)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Ryan E. Galt & Katharine Bradley & Libby Christensen & Cindy Fake & Kate Munden-Dixon & Natasha Simpson & Rachel Surls & Julia Soelen Kim, 2017. "What difference does income make for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) members in California? Comparing lower-income and higher-income households," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 435-452, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development; Consumer/Household Economics;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi17:262180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.