IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa143/202707.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer preferences in food packaging: cub models and conjoint analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Arboretti Giancristofaro, Rosa
  • Bordignon, Paolo

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Arboretti Giancristofaro, Rosa & Bordignon, Paolo, 2015. "Consumer preferences in food packaging: cub models and conjoint analysis," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202707, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa143:202707
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.202707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/202707/files/125R.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.202707?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cicia, Gianni & Corduas, Marcella & Del Giudice, Teresa & Piccolo, Domenico, 2010. "Valuing Consumer Preferences with the CUB Model: A Case Study of Fair Trade Coffee," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12.
    2. Green, Paul E & Srinivasan, V, 1978. "Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 5(2), pages 103-123, Se.
    3. Joonas Rokka & Liisa Uusitalo, 2008. "Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices : Do consumers care?," Post-Print hal-02313351, HAL.
    4. D'Elia, Angela & Piccolo, Domenico, 2005. "A mixture model for preferences data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 917-934, June.
    5. Maria Iannario, 2012. "Modelling shelter choices in a class of mixture models for ordinal responses," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Iannario & Marica Manisera & Domenico Piccolo & Paola Zuccolotto, 2012. "Sensory analysis in the food industry as a tool for marketing decisions," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 6(4), pages 303-321, December.
    2. Gennaro Punzo & Rosalia Castellano & Mirko Buonocore, 2018. "Job Satisfaction in the “Big Four” of Europe: Reasoning Between Feeling and Uncertainty Through CUB Models," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 205-236, August.
    3. Stefania Capecchi & Maria Iannario & Rosaria Simone, 2018. "Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 729-750, January.
    4. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2014. "Modeling rating data with Nonlinear CUB models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 100-118.
    5. Marcella Corduas & Alfonso Piscitelli, 2017. "Modeling university student satisfaction: the case of the humanities and social studies degree programs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 617-628, March.
    6. Simone, Rosaria & Tutz, Gerhard & Iannario, Maria, 2020. "Subjective heterogeneity in response attitude for multivariate ordinal outcomes," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 145-158.
    7. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2022. "A mixture model for ordinal variables measured on semantic differential scales," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 98-123.
    8. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2015. "Identifiability of a model for discrete frequency distributions with a multidimensional parameter space," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 302-316.
    9. Capecchi, Stefania & Amato, Mario & Sodano, Valeria & Verneau, Fabio, 2019. "Understanding beliefs and concerns towards palm oil: Empirical evidence and policy implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Maurizio Carpita & Enrico Ciavolino & Mariangela Nitti, 2019. "The MIMIC–CUB Model for the Prediction of the Economic Public Opinions in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 287-305, November.
    11. Meise, Jan Niklas & Rudolph, Thomas & Kenning, Peter & Phillips, Diane M., 2014. "Feed them facts: Value perceptions and consumer use of sustainability-related product information," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 510-519.
    12. E. Nardo & R. Simone, 2019. "A model-based fuzzy analysis of questionnaires," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(2), pages 187-215, June.
    13. M. Meleddu & M. Pulina & G. Solinas & S. Capecchi, 2019. "Mixture models for consumers' preferences in healthcare," Working Paper CRENoS 201901, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    14. Leonardo Grilli & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo & Carla Rampichini, 2014. "Latent class CUB models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 8(1), pages 105-119, March.
    15. Maria Iannario & Anna Clara Monti & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "Robustness issues for cub models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(4), pages 731-750, December.
    16. Stefania Capecchi & Maria Iannario, 2016. "Gini heterogeneity index for detecting uncertainty in ordinal data surveys," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(2), pages 223-232, August.
    17. Stefania Capecchi & Domenico Piccolo, 2017. "Dealing with heterogeneity in ordinal responses," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 2375-2393, September.
    18. Stefania Capecchi & Marta Meleddu & Manuela Pulina, 2019. "Quality evaluation and preferences of healthcare services: the case of telemedicine in Sardinia," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2339-2351, September.
    19. Winfried Steiner & Harald Hruschka, 2002. "A Probabilistic One-Step Approach to the Optimal Product Line Design Problem Using Conjoint and Cost Data," Review of Marketing Science Working Papers 1-4-1003, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    20. Merja Halme & Kari Linden & Kimmo Kääriä, 2009. "Patients’ Preferences for Generic and Branded Over-the-Counter Medicines," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 2(4), pages 243-255, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa143:202707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.