IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aesc11/108949.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing technical efficiency of organic and conventional coffee farms in Nepal using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach

Author

Listed:
  • Poudel, Krishna Lal
  • Yamamoto, Naoyuki
  • Sugimoto, Yasuhiro
  • Nishiwaki, Aya
  • Kano, Hideyuki

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach used to estimate technical efficiency and followed by regressing the technical efficiency scores to farm specific characters under tobit regression model. Primary data was collected from random samples of 240 (120 from each) coffee famers. Mean technical efficiency score was 0.89 and 0.83 in organic and conventional coffee farming respectively. Farms operating under CRS, DRS and IRS were 31.67, 3.83 and 37.5% respectively in organic coffee and 29.17, 25 and 45.83% respectively in conventional farming areas. Tobit regression showed the variation in technical efficiency was related education, farm experience and training/extension services and excess to credit.

Suggested Citation

  • Poudel, Krishna Lal & Yamamoto, Naoyuki & Sugimoto, Yasuhiro & Nishiwaki, Aya & Kano, Hideyuki, 2011. "Comparing technical efficiency of organic and conventional coffee farms in Nepal using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108949, Agricultural Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesc11:108949
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.108949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/108949/files/14Poudel_Yamamoto_Sugimoto_Nishiwak_Kano.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.108949?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Djokoto, Justice G., 2015. "Technical efficiency of organic agriculture: a quantitative review," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 117(2), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Dong, Zefeng & Guan, Zhengfei & Grogan, Kelly A. & Skevas, Theodoros, 2015. "Energy and Environmental Efficiency of Greenhouse Growers in Michigan," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196840, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Paul Maganga Nsimbila, 2021. "Productivity and Technical Efficiency Variability among Small-Holder Cotton Farmers in Tanzania," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 277293-2772, December.
    4. Saragih, Jef Rudiantho, 2013. "Socioeconomic and Ecological Dimension of Certified and Conventional Arabica Coffee Production in North Sumatra, Indonesia," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 3(03), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Productivity Analysis;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesc11:108949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.